I have a really nice pc to run it on with another coming for Xmas.
Despite this looking and feeling like Fallout 3, it's great. What
makes a person hate a sequel because it seems like DLC from it's
predecessor? If it were launched as DLC for Fallout 3 I'm sure just as
many or more people would've bought it. Who knows, maybe it was intended
to be released as DLC and ended up being more massive than they had
anticipated therefore, creating an entirely new game. I'm only about 2
hours into it but have never been as excited to get a game and play it
than this. I never write reviews. I also have never bought a
walk-through for a game but did for new vegas; that way i don't miss
anything! I wanna play new vegas until my brain thinks VEGAS! seriously
though, if you liked fallout 3 there is no way you could hate this.
That's just absurd.
I also found out that this game really
is just Fallout 3 in a different setting. The lead of that project
called "Van Buren" (Sounds like Armin Van Buuren | #1 trance VA DJ) was
also the lead designer for this series. Black Isle was supposed to have
developed Fallout 3, however all the employees got laid off and they
were like 80% done with the game. Knowing that bit of information makes
this even more disappointing that they were trying to milk the fans of
FO3 using same game engine, different plot, etc. There is no wow factor
for this game anymore. Just another chapter in Fallout 3: New Vegas With
Extra Bugs.
Patches make all the difference, in about six months it'll increase 0.5 points and after that the sky is the limit. +10 pts?
Monday, August 16, 1999
Fallout: New Vegas review
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
No comments :
Post a Comment