Thursday, February 27, 2014

2nd Walt Disney World vacation

This is the second visit, 17 years after the first one. 
I picked Disney World, because everybody else picked it and its completely normal. The #1 vacation destination in the US. It was $3.50 for a 24 ounce Mountain Dew.

 photo Waltdisneyworld49_zps4c63de34.jpg  photo Waltdisneyworld48_zps56f48148.jpg  photo Waltdisneyworld45_zps90807f7f.jpg  photo Waltdisneyworld46_zps6ea2958f.jpg  photo Waltdisneyworld44_zps80a92391.jpg  photo Waltdisneyworld47_zps9f7b3ea9.jpg  photo Waltdisneyworld43_zpsfc0cce94.jpg  photo Waltdisneyworld42_zpsb1954ecf.jpg  photo Waltdisneyworld39_zps6c474d70.jpg  photo Waltdisneyworld36_zpsc4d7f169.jpg  photo Waltdisneyworld35_zpsb56607ac.jpg  photo Waltdisneyworld34_zpsaf6b4286.jpg  photo Waltdisneyworld30_zps432ab183.jpg  photo Waltdisneyworld32_zps1d3a7277.jpg  photo Waltdisneyworld26_zps269a2050.jpg  photo Waltdisneyworld20_zps12480994.jpg  photo Waltdisneyworld14_zps1cfdd25e.jpg  photo waltdisneyworld12_zps321fb1a4.jpg  photo waltdisneyworld10_zpsa25fecec.jpg  photo waltdisneyworld7_zps213b387e.jpg  photo waltdisneyworld_zps0dcce656.jpg  photo waltdisneyworld2_zpsdc551352.jpg

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Impeachable Offenses: The Case for Removing Barack Obama From Office

The possibility of impeaching Barack Obama based a wide range of alleged constitutional violations already has been discussed by a long list of members of Congress, from Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, to Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif.

Now Rep. Paul Broun, a Georgia Republican who is seeking to replace the retiring Sen. Saxby Chambliss, is joining the list.

He’s accompanied by a couple of his opponents in the open race.

A video from a forum over the weekend featuring candidates for Chambliss’ seat shows Broun and two others, Derrick Grayson, an engineer, and Eugene Yu, a businessman, raising their hands when asked whether they would support impeachment.

A forum moderator asked the candidates: “Obama has perjured himself on multiple occasions. Would you support impeachment if presented for a vote?”

Broun, Grayson and Yu raised their hands.

Several other candidates did not, and there were others vying for the office who were not in attendance.

WND has been reporting on members of Congress who have discussed impeachment. The list now includes:

Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa; Rep. Blake Farenthold, R-Texas; Rep. Steve Stockman, R-Texas; Rep. Bill Flores, R-Texas; Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif.; Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla.; Rep. Kerry Bentivolio, R-Mich.; Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas; Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla.; Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah; Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C.; Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.; Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas; Rep. Trey Radel, R-Fla.; and Rep. Ted Yoho, R-Fla.

Read the definitive case for removing Barack Obama from office in “Impeachable Offenses” by Aaron Klein and Brenda J. Elliott.

Several, including King and Farenthold, made comments in interviews with Sean Hannity.

King pointed to the president’s actions on immigration, such as his orders for authorities not to enforce current immigration law, as grounds for impeachment.

He said there are multiple violations related to Obamacare and asserted the president’s “recess” appointments of judges when the Senate was not actually in recess also is worthy.

The “uber-presidency,” King said, has little or no respect for the Constitution.

Farenthold said Obama “is grabbing as much power as he can,” but Congress also is doing little to draw in the reins.

The two said that politically, Obama is exercising great power and believes Congress cannot or will not stop him.

“The president knows it; he’s exploiting it,” King said.

Stockman even handed out in Congress copies of a book that has been described by its authors as the “articles of impeachment” for Barack Obama. Stockman suggested that special investigations and possibly prosecutions are needed in response to Fast and Furious, Benghazi and other Obama scandals.

Rep. Bill Flores, R-Texas, was speaking at a town hall meeting when he considered the idea. A video of his comments was posted at the Western Center for Journalism.

“I’ve looked at the president. I think he’s violated the Constitution. I think he’s violated the Bill of Rights,” he said.

He said at some point a decision must be made.

“I think if the House had an impeachment vote, it would probably impeach the president.”

But he noted there are only 46 members of the GOP in the U.S. Senate, where an impeached president would be put on trial.

To obtain a conviction, the prosecuting team must have 67 votes, and he wasn’t sure even all of the GOP members would vote to convict.

“I think he’s breaking the law if he strikes without congressional approval,” Hunter told the Washington Times regarding Obama’s plan to bomb Syria. “And if he proceeds without Congress providing that authority, it should be considered an impeachable offense.”

WND previously reported Coburn’s statement that Obama is “perilously close” to qualifying for impeachment.

Speaking at the Muskogee Civic Center in Oklahoma, the senator said, “What you have to do is you have to establish the criteria that would qualify for proceedings against the president, and that’s called impeachment.”

Coburn said it’s “not something you take lightly, and you have to use a historical precedent of what that means.”

Visit WND’s online Impeachment Store to see all the products related to ousting Obama.

Earlier, Bentivolio said it would be a “dream come true” to impeach Obama.

Bentivolio told the Birmingham Bloomfield Republican Club Meeting, “You know, if I could write that bill and submit it, it would be a dream come true.”

He told constituents: “I feel your pain and I know. I stood 12 feet away from that guy and listened to him, and I couldn’t stand being there. But because he is president I have to respect the office. That’s my job as a congressman. I respect the office.”

Bentivolio said his experience with the president caused him to consult with attorneys about what it would take to remove Obama from office.

Cruz responded to a question about impeachment after a speech.

“It’s a good question,” Cruz said. “And I’ll tell you the simplest answer: To successfully impeach a president you need the votes in the U.S. Senate.”

In May, Inhofe suggested Obama could be impeached over a White House cover-up after the attack in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012.

He told listeners of “The Rusty Humphries Show”: “Of all the great cover-ups in history – the Pentagon papers, Iran-Contra, Watergate, all the rest of them – this … is going to go down as the most egregious cover-up in American history.”

But even with that searing indictment, Inhofe, too, stopped short of calling for impeachment.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, has offered tentative support for impeachment.

“I’m not willing to take it off the table, but that’s certainly not what we’re striving for,” he told CNN.

One Republican actually has come out and called for the impeachment of Obama, and he did it more than two years ago, before he became a congressman.

Rep. Ted Yoho, R-Fla., posted on his website in June 2011 a list of reasons for impeachment.

Other figures who have discussed impeachment include Glenn Beck, Watergate investigative reporter Bob Woodward, WND columnist Nat Hentoff and a panel of top constitutional experts.

Stockman recently distributed copies of the book, “Impeachable Offenses: The Case for Removing Barack Obama From Office,” to the other 434 members of the House of Representatives to bolster his case for a special investigation of the president.

The bestselling “Impeachable Offenses” presents an indictment that goes well beyond today’s headlines.

The Daily Mail of London has called “Impeachable Offenses” “explosive,” reporting that the book contains a “systematic connect-the-dots exercise that the president’s defenders will find troublesome.”

Constituents also are reaching some surprising conclusions.

Voters in Republican Rep. Jim Bridenstine’s Oklahoma district may look meek and mild, maybe even sweet, but their opinions of President Obama reveal nothing but a battleground “take-no-prisoners” attitude.

One lady, for example, said there needs to be changes in the Senate so “we can impeach the S-O-B.”

She complained that Congress is doing nothing, and that “allows this moron to make decisions.”

“He has no authority. None.”

The video was uploaded just this week, but it’s unclear when the meeting was held, and the congressman’s office was unable to provide details immediately.

At one point the congressman references “back in April 2013,” and it appears to be winter, so likely it was recorded in the past few months.

The congressman had been documenting Obama’s “lawlessness.”


Friday, February 21, 2014

The Best Defection made too late!

I only became a Green Bay Packer fan since 2005 ~ after high school. Those green and white jerseys with G in my face daily since 1989 and somehow I hadn't any Packer gear until 2006.  After the gold and purple gear constantly alienated me from the rest of the peeps.  I must've been a high school retard!  At least I did not show it on my class picture by wearing a Buffalo Sabres cap.

Twenty-five years ago I couldn’t imagine hating a team and their fans more than the Chicago Bears, but somehow, Minnesota Vikings fans, you’ve managed to pull off the impossible. You don’t know shit about the game. You have no sense of history or tradition.

Teams who win are given respect. Their fans are given respect. The Vikings… are 0-4 in Super Bowls.  . It’s so bad, it annually helps make the Vikings one of the poorest franchises in the NFL. So, what are you going to do about it, Vikings fan? You’re going to go out in public and complain, demand the state finance a new stadium and make a mockery of yourself, even though your state is in major debt and faced with cutting funding for things like… education. Brilliant!

Do you know the last time a Green Bay Packers game was blacked out? No, you don’t, because it’s never happened. Do you know how long the Packers season-ticket waiting list is? Decades. On the other hand, you have the Minnesota Vikings, where anyone can buy season tickets because they’re never sold out. In fact, the Viking

In many cases, an inferiority complex results from an imagined feeling of inferiority, rather than an actual one. That certainly isn’t the case here. You are inferior, Minnesota Vikings fans. You know it and it shows. And let me tell you this, it’s not sexy, cool or even tolerable, for that matter. Your inferiority complex, which rightfully has something to do with that Super Bowl drought, causes you to make overly bold predictions, think the Vikings are better than they really are, act like a prick to all other NFL fans and gloat incessantly when something actually goes right for your beloved team. That’s not to mention you don’t have even an ounce of humility when the Vikings get their ass beat. I’ve never once heard a Vikings fan congratulate an opposing team’s fans on a win. I’ve never once heard a Vikings fan empathize with opposing fans after they lose to the Vikings.

Thursday, February 20, 2014

TR-3 Aurora

Aurora Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Image via Hendrickson
(Image licensed under Creative Commons Attirbution-ShareAlike 3.0)
There is nothing more fascinating in the aviation world than the “black projects” – aircraft programs that are so secret that even those with the highest security clearance may have no idea they exist.  But occasionally the veil of secrecy is accidentally lifted – or projects are declassified – offering a fleeting glimpse into this shadowy world.  Here we take to the air with six different planes – some now released into the public domain, others still highly classified or even non-existent.
TR-3A Black Manta
 Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Images by Adrian Mann
Allegedly active during the 1980s and ’90s, little is known of the TR-3A Black Manta beyond rumour and hearsay.  Popularly embraced as a subsonic stealth aircraft manufactured by Northrop Grumman (famed for its “flying wing” designs), the TR-3A was rumoured to have been used in the Gulf War in conjunction with F-117A stealth fighters, but little evidence exists to support this.  Another theory – again unsubstantiated – holds that the vehicle identified as the TR-3 was a prototype for the B-2 Spirit.
TR 3A Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist(Image:
Two 1977 designs from Teledyne Ryan, a firm specialising in unmanned aerial vehicles, have been linked to the TR-3A.  This stems in part from the fact that “TR” stands for Teledyne Ryan – a fanciful connection considering “TR” is well known to denote “tactical reconnaissance.  Teledyne Ryan was purchased by Northrop Grumman in 1999, adding fuel to the fire of conspiracy theory.  But aside from a patent (below) that is said to resemble the configuration of whatever aircraft has been identified with the TR-3A, there is little, if any, credible evidence linking it to Teledyne Ryan.
The designation “TR-3″ likely came about due to confusion with another black project, Tier III, which led to the RQ-3 Darkstar.  Another theory holds that the aircraft dubbed the TR-3 may have grown out of the Tactical High Altitude Penetrator (THAP) studies, of which little exists in the public domain.  This article discusses THAP’s potential mission as a recon-strike platform, which could account for a plethora of sightings throughout the 1980s and ’90s.  However, there is significant debate over whether THAP progressed to the flight testing stage.  If THAP was not responsible for the “TR-3A” sightings, it’s possible another secret demonstrator associated with the A-12 Avenger programme (below) could have been…
Flying Triangle dubbed “TR-3B”
The online world is buzzing with information about the alleged “TR-3B“, from rumours of its fantastical capabilities to intriguing video footage.  Yet despite numerous sightings suggesting the existence of a large triangular aircraft that can fly slowly and quietly, little information exists about this rumoured black project. Like the TR-3A above, the designation “TR-3B” is almost certainly a misnomer.
The most dramatic claims frame the “TR-3B” as a nuclear powered tactical reconnaissance aircraft capable of disrupting gravity.  But a more likely – and in many ways more interesting – argument for these strange flying triangles, is that they’re lighter-than-air vehicles or some sort of stealthy troop transport aircraft.  Given the technologies proven by Have Blue and Tacit Blue in the 1970s and ’80s and the number of projects that have allegedly been tested at Groom Lake since that time, it’s not impossible to think that some of these flying triangle reports may have some substance to them, if not under the designation TR-3B.
A-12 Avenger II (and the Mysterious Jet that May Have Preceeded it)
A 12 Avenger II Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Image via U.S. Navy
The A-12 Avenger II was envisioned by McDonnell Douglas and General Dynamics as an all-weather, carrier-based stealth bomber for the U.S. Navy and Marines.  Shrowded in secrecy at the time of development in 1983, the A-12 reportedly gained the nickname “Flying Dorito”.  Concept drawings and mock-ups show a flying wing design in the shape of an isosceles triangle, with the cockpit near the apex.
A 12 Avenger II 2 Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Image by Anynobody
(Image licensed under Creative Commons Attirbution-ShareAlike 3.0)
Development of the A-12 was hampered by problems.  The project was cancelled in January 1991 by then-Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney when the estimated price of each plane allegedly hit $165 million.  The cancellation was said to be a breach of contract, resulting in years of legal wrangling.  In 2009, a court finally ruled in favour of the government and ordered the contractors to pay more than a $2 billion in charges, but the battle ranges on to this day.
 Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Images via U.S. Navy
After the cancellation of the A-12 Avenger II the Navy purchased the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet.  While there was never a full scale prototype, an earlier (1976 – 1984) classified General Dynamics technology demonstrator called Model 100 (funded under the Have Key program) may have paved the way for the cancelled A-12.  It has been suggested that this aircraft remains secret due to the ongoing legal issues.  The A-12 has also been linked to a secret plane called Sneaky Pete, which may or may not be the Model 100, or a development thereof.  We were able to locate one A-12 mock-up thanks to those savvy online explorers at Virtual Globetrotting.
X-44 Manta
X 44 Manta Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Image via
(Image licensed under Creative Commons Attirbution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported)
The X-44 Manta was a conceptual design by Lockheed Martin, based on the original F-22 Raptor (below).  The X-44 was essentially a tailless Raptor with large delta wing and advanced thrust vectoring nozzles replacing normal aerodynamic control surfaces.  Benefits would be a more stealthy, light airframe, with increased fuel volume and maneuverability.  The plan was to convert an early F-22 prototype but the program was allegedly terminated in 2000.  The X-44 render looks similar to the proposed FB-22, reportedly cancelled in 2006.
F 22 Raptor Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Image via Rob Shenk
(Image licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic)
It’s hard to know what to make of many alleged black projects.  Could some of these exotic aircraft be one and the same?  How much disinformation is out there?  The X-44 was essentially a flying wing design with a name similar to the TR-3A “Black Manta”, although in the X-44′s case, MANTA apparently denoted Multi-Axis No-Tail Aircraft.  Could this be a case of one black project’s name being mistakenly attributed to another, like TR-3 and Tier III?  In 2005, reported that the X-44 designation may be reserved for a possible NASA full-scale manned tailless flight control demonstrator.
HALO (High Altitude Low Observability) / BAE Replica
BAE Replica1 Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist(Image: Stridus, public domain)
Like other black projects, Britain’s effort to create a stealth demonstrator remains shadowy, despite cancellation in the 1990s.  The Replica program was a BAE Systems design study tied in with the RAF’s now defunct Future Offensive Air System (FOAS).  It is known to have run from 1994 to 1999, with a full-sized mock-up subjected to rigorous testing to determine its radar cross section (above).
JSF Proposal Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Image via Planeman
FOAS set out to replace the RAF’s Tornado GR4 jets with a range of manned and unmanned platforms by 2017.  The program was cancelled in June 2005 after the UK joined the U.S. Joint-Unmanned Combat Air System (J-UCAS) program, which was itself cancelled the next year but later revived as the Navy-only UCAS-D program.  After the termination of FOAS, knowledge gained from Replica was poured into the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF).
 Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Images via United States Air Force
Initial arguments over Britain’s access to the JSF source code prompted Britain to consider a potential alternative.  While likely referring to an adapted Eurofighter Typhoon, Replica remains in the shadows, despite public acknowledgement of the program and photos of the full scale mock-up stored at BAE Warton.  This could be due to the ongoing use of Replica’s technology in forthcoming projects, such as the JSF, but also Taranis, a BAE unmanned demonstrator.  Again publicly acknowledged, Taranis is set to fly next year although sightings suggest it – or perhaps something else – flew in 2009, which the British government vehemently denies.
Aurora – Hypersonic Spyplane
Aurora 2 Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Image via Hendrickson and Foxbat
(Image licensed under Creative Commons Attirbution-ShareAlike 3.0)
The Aurora spyplane is the world’s most famous top secret aircraft, and a reliable photograph would be one of the most coveted finds in the history of classified aviation.  Historically presented as a hypersonic replacement for the ageing SR-71 Blackbird spyplane (below), there’s considerable evidence available in the public domain to suggest no specific aircraft called “Aurora” ever existed.
SR 71 Blackbird Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
SR-71 Blackbird (image via U.S. Air Force)
The name “Aurora” reportedly slipped out in the 1985 US budget alongside an allocation of $455 million for “black aircraft production”.  Excited journalists, writing in the March 1990 edition of Aviation Week & Space Technology, linked “Aurora” to the reported black aircraft, and later to a family of exotic aviation projects, claiming that by 1987 funding had reached $2.3 billion.  Ben Rich, former director of the Lockheed Skunk Works (which built the F-117, below), said there never was a hypersonic Blackbird follow-on and claimed Aurora was the name given to the B-2 Stealth Bomber competition funding.
F 117 Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
F-117 Nighthawk (image by U.S. Air Force)
Helping to fuel the Aurora legend was a disjointed catalogue of sightings and mysterious sonic booms.  The most compelling sighting came in August 1989, when Chris Gibson, an engineer aboard the Galveston Key rig in the North Sea, observed a strange isosceles triangle-shaped aircraft refuelling from a KC-135 Stratotanker, escorted by two F-111 bombers.  Gibson, a member of the Royal Observer Corps and trained aircraft recognition expert, could not identify the mysterious plane.
 Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Image via Google Earth
In the early 1990s, the disclosed “Aurora” designation and the “North Sea sighting” were linked to several other reports that helped perpetuate the story of a top secret SR-71 follow-on.  One was a report of an aircraft over Amarillo, Texas, with an engine described as emitting a “strange, loud pulsating roar”.  Caught on film was an alleged “donuts-on-a-rope” contrail that has become synonymous with the Aurora myth.  While some attribute this to a potential pulse wave detonation engine, others have argued the contrails could have been made by ordinary jet aircraft.
 Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Images via Google Earth
Finally, a series of bizarre sonic booms heard over California up until 1993 were attributed to Aurora after seismologists concluded they did not characterise earthquakes, but indictated “something at 90,000 feet, Mach 4 to Mach 5.2″.  Intriguingly, each unexplained sonic boom came on a Thursday morning between 6 and 7am.  In addition, Groom Lake (Area 51) has a six mile long runway, now closed, that some say would be a requirement for testing a high speed, mach 5 plus, aircraft.
It’s telling that, more than 20 years after Aurora debuted in aviation and popular science publications, no solid evidence has been found to support its existence, despite the hype and hordes of investigators digging for information.  At this point it seems likely that the top secret aircraft known as Aurora stems from sightings of various aircraft (some potentially black projects) and not necessarily a single airframe.  That said, Chris Gibson’s sighting and the strange skyquakes remain a mystery to this day.
If you enjoyed this article, explore more urban ghosts within our archives. You can also subscribe to our feed, become our friend

Darren Perks
UFO Investigative Researcher and Media Contributor

UFO: Flying Triangles

Posted: 29/09/2012

There are thousands of UFO sightings around the world every year, but a high percentage of them relate to one very common UFO and shape....

Strange flying black triangle UFOs


I myself witnessed one on 30 March 1993, which was part of the famous UK Cosford UFO incident, and I became one of thousands of people who have witnessed these strange craft in our skies.

Read more about the Cosford UFO incident here: Cosford UFO

But what are they?

They are large, triangular-shaped UFOs, often black in colour, with rounded corners and making a low, humming noise. They disappear to the horizon at unbelievable speed. They are ususally big craft and show up from nowhere in the blink of an eye.

The first sighting of these mystery triangles was recorded and reported in 1965. Some say they were first sighted in 1950s. For some time people have said they are secret military projects - the next generation stealth aircrafts. But why are they flying the same way since sixties. How come the technology never changed in more than 50 years?

According to many ufologists like myself, these UFOs are the outcome of direct transfer of technologies from extraterrestrials to human civilization in different parts of the world. They are believed to be reverse engineered from crashed UFOs, and have been developed behind closed doors at top secret military facilities and bases around the world. One such facility is Groom Lake aka Area 51 in Nevada USA: AREA 51

The triangle shaped UFOs are said to use anti-gravity propulsion. They also use superconductors to create the electromagnetic flux as well as anti-gravity propulsion. That is why the humming noise comes out which was heard by myself and many others. What I witnessed on 30th March 1993 was very real indeed and is still unexplained along with other flying triangle incidnets. But we have to consider the possibility that it may not just be Extra-Terrestrail UFOs, but craft developed by us from their technology...

Some laugh at this theory and just asume people who see these triangles are seeing illusions. But when have you heard and invetsigated people seeing exactly the same thing or 'illusion' (from a sceptics point of view) in places tens of thousands of miles apart, it cannot be and illusion or something just made up in the mind.

Read more:,+UFOs,+sighting,+Bob,+Robert,+Lazar,+sighting,+sightings,+report,+MUFON,+mj12,+alien,+aliens,+ET,+space,+odd,+strange,+area+51,+area+s4,+Top+secret,+confidential21.+Triangle+UFO+on+hill.tif

Pennsylvania Lights
GAP -- Last night, July 29th, 2012. I was traveling eastbound on US Route 30. I was driving when I saw 6-7 large "fireballs" traveling towards me. I knew pretty quickly these were not airplanes, due to how they were grouped together and I have been in this area for 12 years and I am accustomed to the airplanes that travel in this area. They were a bright burning red color that was constant that did not dim or flash.
I pulled over on the side of the road and began filming with my IPhone 4GS. The first four were traveling in two pairs and the others were traveling in singles behind. The objects started to align in a triangle, then a straight line before disappearing. Thanks to MUFON CMS
Texas Triangle
SHAMROCK -- I put Travis County and Austin in the location fields of the form at the request of the field investigator (Robert Powell). A friend who attended college picked me up on November 20, 2000. It was at dusk near I-40 when I noticed the object moving northeast. As we got within two miles it was crossing the highway ahead of us, and we could tell that it was moving very slowly.
We saw it was not a conventional aircraft, and had blue lights at each point of the triangle. The lights were steadily glowing as it flew by at 35 mph, at 1,000 feet in altitude. We had never seen anything like it before. It was probably 400 yards across at least. Other people in cars were standing outside watching. We eventually lost sight of it. I found this picture that is similar but the object we saw was much larger. Thanks to MUFON CMS
Utah Cylinder

SALT LAKE CITY – Mothership videotaped over city on July 13, 2012. A cylinder shaped object was seen over the city once again.


Posted on January 18, 2012 by PFEIFER



While traveling South in the slow lane, on Interstate 91, at 4:50 am, I looked in my drivers side mirror and noticed a Black Triangular object with large yellow lights approximately 50ft. above and directly over the roof of a car, in the fast lane. After about 5 seconds I refocused my driving to the road in front of me as I was headed towards the breakdown lane.  I maneuvered my vehicle back into the slow lane and once again looked into the drivers side mirror and the object was gone. The vehicle behind me in the fast lane was still proceeding south behind me. The entire event lasted about 10 seconds. As I proceeded South, still looking through my drivers side window and passenger side window into the sky looking for the object, it didnt reappear! After I proceeded approximately a mile South on the interstate I saw what looked like a red shooting star with a streak in the sky directly in front of me lasting about 2 seconds. NOTE: The above image is a rendering.

Thanks to MUFON CMS system.