Anyone who has seen the NBC sitcom “Community”
can attest to its unflattering portrayal of community college faculty
members and administrators. The public image of what were once called
junior colleges does not seem to be improving, despite the fact that
today community colleges hire for their faculties hyper-educated
scholars. This is in large part the result of the extremely competitive
academic job market (see Reason 8),
which has squeezed people with hopes of teaching at research
universities or four-year colleges into jobs at community colleges. So,
it is interesting that a program like “Community” should have appeared
at a time when community colleges were hiring instructors with PhDs from Harvard and MIT.
Obviously, the rise in the quality (or at least in the quality and
quantity of the credentials) of the permanent faculty members at
colleges of all kinds is not the only trend affecting academe and its
public image. Part of the growing disrespect for—and ambivalence
toward—higher education is a result of the slackening
of academic standards for students and the proliferation of college
course and degree offerings in subjects viewed (fairly or unfairly) as frivolous
by the public. Part is bred by familiarity; as more and more adults
have had at least some college education, they have less reason to view
universities with the reverence inspired by the unknown and
unattainable. Part of the disrespect is fostered by the higher education
establishment itself, which by means of “adjunctification” (see Reason 14)
has made work for professional academics insecure and unrewarding. And
part of the disrespect stems from academics themselves, who have helped
to dismantle (for good and for ill) the aura that once surrounded their
profession by, for example, dressing more and more like their students.
No comments :
Post a Comment