It’s On: McCarthy Formally Blocks Schiff, Swalwell From Intelligence Committee

 his article has been updated to include reactions from Reps. Adam Schiff (D-CA), Eric Swalwell (D-CA), and Ilhan Omar (D-MN).

On Tuesday night, just as he has promised for months he would do, Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) formally blocked Reps. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Eric Swalwell (D-CA) from the House Intelligence Committee. Despite McCarthy repeatedly warning he would take such action, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) on Monday nominated the embattled Democratic members to the committee, as they had requested.

McCarthy tweeted out the letter he sent to Jeffries. While his letter did acknowledge “I appreciate the loyalty you have to your Democratic colleagues, and I acknowledge your efforts to have two Members of Congress reinstated to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence,” McCarthy nevertheless reminds Jeffries that allowing Schiff and Swalwell to serve on the committee is something he cannot do.

“But I cannot put partisan loyalty ahead of national security, and I cannot simply recognize years of serve as the sole criteria for membership on this essential committee. Integrity matters more,” the letter continued with original emphasis.

As Punchbowl News mentioned in its Monday morning newsletter sharing Jeffries’ letter about the committees, Schiff is one of the longest-serving members during its 45-year history. He has served as the committee’s chairman and was looking to be its ranking member.

Towards the closing of his letter, McCarthy also warns of his assessment “that the misuse of this panel during the 116th and 117th Congresses severely undermined the primary national security and oversight missions–ultimately leaving our nation less safe.” McCarthy closes by mentioning his commitment to “returning the Intelligence Committee to one of genuine honesty and credibility that regains theorist of the American people.”
1
2
3
4
    
<img draggable="false" role="img" class="emoji" alt="🚨" src="https://s0.wp.com/wp-content/mu-plugins/wpcom-smileys/twemoji/2/svg/1f6a8.svg">SPEAKER MCCARTHY TO MINORITY LEADER HAKEEM JEFFRIES:
 
“I am hereby rejecting the appointments of Representative Adam Schiff and Representative Eric Swalwell to serve on the Intelligence Committee.” pic.twitter.com/eqeGOIY4Q6
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) January 25, 2023

Recommended
TAPES: We Investigated a Suburban LGBTQ Pedophile Ring. Here’s What We Found.
Mia Cathell

McCarthy has not only warned for some time that he would not allow Schiff and Swalwell to serve on the committee, but has given cause. The speaker has listed concerns with an FBI briefing when it comes to Swalwell serving on such a committee, due to his ties to Chinese spy Fang Fang, and how Schiff lied to and misled the American people on the Ukrainian whistleblow and the “Russia collusion” hoax.

“What did Adam Schiff do as the chairman of the Intel Committee,” McCarthy laid out for reporters before going off with a whole list of offenses. “What Adam Schiff did, use his power as the chairman, and lie to the American public–even the Inspector General said it–when [former Rep.] Devin Nunes put out a memo, he said it was false, when we had a laptop he used it before an election to bring politics and say that it was false and say that it was the Russians, when he knew different, when he knew the Intel.”

As he listed out these offenses, McCarthy made clear that Schiff abused his power as chairman, having had information that the rest of the American people did not. “He used his position as chairman, knowing he has information the rest of America does not, and lied to the American public.”

McCarthy also referenced, as he has multiple times in the past, the Ukrainian whistleblower. “When a whistleblower came forward, he said he did not know the individual, even though his staff had met with them and set it up.”

“So no, he does not have a right to sit on that [committee].” Seeking to distinguish himself from Democrats, who when they controlled the 117th Congress, removed Reps. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) and Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) from all of their committee assignments, McCarthy offered “so yes, he can serve on a committee, but he will not serve on Intel, ’cause it goes to the national security of America, and I will always put them first, all right?”
1
2
3
4
5
6
    
Speaker McCarthy goes OFF on Adam Schiff in front of reporters:
 
“No! He does NOT have a right to sit on that [Intelligence Committee]!”
 
<img draggable="false" role="img" class="emoji" alt="🔥" src="https://s0.wp.com/wp-content/mu-plugins/wpcom-smileys/twemoji/2/svg/1f525.svg"><img draggable="false" role="img" class="emoji" alt="🔥" src="https://s0.wp.com/wp-content/mu-plugins/wpcom-smileys/twemoji/2/svg/1f525.svg"><img draggable="false" role="img" class="emoji" alt="🔥" src="https://s0.wp.com/wp-content/mu-plugins/wpcom-smileys/twemoji/2/svg/1f525.svg"> pic.twitter.com/sczuh6yjJx
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) January 25, 2023

McCarthy has also mentioned a commitment to ensuring Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) does not serve on the the House Foreign Affairs Committee, due to her antisemitism, which her Democratic colleagues have largely downplayed.

Fox News’ Chad Pergram tweeted out reactions from Swalwell, per his colleague Tyler Olson.
1
2
3
4
5
    
2) Swalwell: It's too bad because that committee has always been a bipartisan committee, and he's taking one of the most precious pieces of glassware in the congressional cabinet and smashing it in. The damage is going to be irreparable.
— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) January 25, 2023
 
4) Swalwell: Boehner was around when this investigation happened, and he kept me on the committee and he reappointed me..So the fact that McCarthy would now try and heat up the leftovers for something that happened nearly a decade ago just shows that is pure political vengeance
— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) January 25, 2023

Pergram later tweeted out more reactions, which came off exactly as you would expect from the three members, who threw out all sorts of charges.
1
2
3
4
5
    
2) Schiff/Swalwell/Omar on McCarthy: He struck a corrupt bargain in his desperate, and nearly failed, attempt to win the Speakership, a bargain that required political vengeance against the three of us.
— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) January 25, 2023
 
3) Schiff/Swalwell/Omar: But despite these efforts, McCarthy won’t be successful. We will continue to speak out against extremism and doggedly defend our democracy.
— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) January 25, 2023

In the case of Omar’s assignment though, the House will need to vote on barring her from serving on the committee. Pergram also tweeted out that it is “Unclear if McCarthy would have the votes” to do so.
1
2
    
Since the Intelligence Cmte is a "select" cmte, McCarthy can reject mbrs from serving on that panel. However, the full House may need to vote to prospectively block Dem MN Rep Omar from serving on the Foreign Affairs Cmte. Unclear if McCarthy would have the votes for that
— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) January 25, 2023

McCarthy appears to have at least a few defections there. As highlighted by The Hill’s Mychael Schnell, Rep. Victoria Spartz (R-IN) released a statement earlier on Tuesday indicating she opposes denying Democratic members their committee assignments. “Two wrongs do not make a right,” she began her statement by saying, also later making clear Speaker McCarthy needs to stop “bread and circuses” in Congress and start governing for a change.”
1
2
3
4
    
Rep. Spartz issued a statement on proposed committee removals of Democrats without proper due process urging @SpeakerMcCarthy to stop “bread and circuses” in Congress and start governing for a change.
 
Two wrongs do not make a right. https://t.co/a6sZhW6V52
— Rep. Victoria Spartz (@RepSpartz) January 24, 2023

Reps. Don Bacon (R-NE) and David Valadao appear undecided, according to CNN, with Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) joining Rep. Spartz in her opposition.
1
2
3
4
    
David Valadao tells me he’s still undecided on a resolution to boot Omar from the committee. Spartz & Mace already signaled they’re a no.
 
Republicans can only afford to lose four votes. https://t.co/NJFtCrzDE3
— Melanie Zanona (@MZanona) January 25, 2023