Monday, July 22, 2024

Donald Trump, George Washington, Character, and Providence

 

Only a few months ago, many of my Christian friends were bemoaning America's fate and could not understand how evil could be so ascendant over our country’s inherent goodness. Some concluded that the spiritual vacuum that ensued from driving God out of American culture during the last sixty-plus years had been filled by evil spiritual forces that are now manifest in taking America to new lows of depravity. 

But we should never forget that God is in control. Proverbs 19:21 reminds us that man’s waywardness will be corrected, for “it is the purpose of the Lord that will stand.”  It may be that God has allowed what He previously let happen in ancient times, with the Israelites' Babylonian captivity because of sin, idolatry, and faithlessness.

With the United States presently passing through an extremely dark and corrupt period of dishonest and deceitful rule, God is crying out to wake up the American people. Americans have been slow in that awakening because of their relative affluence combined with their complacency, normalcy bias, and denial. 

But now things are quickly changing, as we see in the events of the last few weeks. The hidden hand of God appears to have been working in unexpected ways. 

First, the Democrat Party is self-destructing. The party and its deep state puppet masters chose a compromised, doddering, and senile candidate to be their flag-bearer and presidential candidate—a man so corrupt that he could be easily controlled.  That brought us open borders to accelerate America’s demise, allowing entry of America-hating foreign militants, terror organizations, and criminal drug and child-trafficking cartels. Domestically, merit has been undermined by requiring the imposition of DEI in all government agencies, and unbridled lawfare has been unleashed, weaponizing justice and destroying lives through costly, politically driven litigation. 

For those willing and able to see all of this, it is increasingly clear that the Democrats have betrayed common sense American interests and have lost whatever shred of moral authority they had previously claimed. Regardless of Joe Biden being forced out of running for a second term, the Democrat Party is left with no candidate who can defeat Donald Trump. 

Second, on July 12, Federal Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents felony case against Trump with a double slap-down of Attorney General Merrick Garland and Special Counsel Jack Smith—on the grounds that the former had unconstitutionally appointed the latter. 

Third, only a day later, the assassination attempt on Trump at the Butler, Pennsylvania rally changed everything, with the world seeing Trump getting up bloodied from a wound from a bullet that would have taken his life, but for Heaven’s timely turning his head, causing the bullet to pierce his ear rather than his skull that had been in the line of fire a fraction of a second before.  Trump’s image was instantly elevated in the U.S. and throughout the entire world, with photographs of him with blood on his face and fist in the air, showing resilience and a superhuman fighting spirit to defend the American flag in the background. Choreographed by God, that iconic Trump photograph reminded everyone of America’s most famous World War II image—that of six U.S. Marines victoriously planting the U.S. flag during the Battle of Iwo-Jima. 

Fourth, a few days later, the Republican National Convention began. On display was a GOP that showed greater diversity and unity than ever before—something no one would have thought possible only five months ago.

 When it is obvious that even the smartest and most prescient could not begin to orchestrate this amazing turnaround, we must consider that the Almighty has been at work—through imperfect people, as those are all He has to work with. And now, even more people here at home and around the world recognize that Donald Trump has been uniquely raised to lead America through a dangerous and tumultuous time such as this. 

In several vital ways, despite contrasts in style,  the 45th and soon-to-be 47th President Donald Trump and the two-term 1st President George Washington have a great deal in common in qualities of character to lead effectively against impossible odds. 

Washington experienced Providence's protective intervention twenty years before he was chosen as the Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army in 1775. At that time, Washington was  22 years old and serving as the junior-most officer under British General Braddock during the French and Indian War. 

Marching and riding through an open field surrounded by trees, Indian sharpshooters ambushed their battalion of about 1400 troops, training their rifles first on all the officers on horseback. In short order, Braddock and every one of his officers were on the ground, dead or dying, while Washington continued under continuous fire on his third horse after the first two had been shot out from under him. Try as they would, the Indians could not take Washington down as he persisted in organizing a retreat. In a letter to his brother composed later that evening,  Washington wrote, “…by the miraculous care of Providence, that protected me beyond all human expectation; I had four bullets through my coat… yet escaped unhurt.” 

This experience shaped the rest of Washington’s life, making faith and trust in God a permanent part of his persona, giving him the courage to always lead his Revolutionary War troops from the front, confident that he had the protection of the Almighty. 

Now, Trump has also experienced the protective hand of God in preventing bullets from taking his life, augmenting his faith, and reinvigorating his courage. Washington persisted for six long years leading the Continental Army,  ultimately winning surrender by the British, although he lost more battles than he won. 

As for Trump, who is now in his ninth year fighting the deep state, his persistence record exceeds that of Washington. No matter—faith, courage, and persistence are the essential leadership character qualities needed now for the rebirth of American liberty, just as they were in assuring the victory of American independence in 1781.

Does Boebert Really Want This Cabinet Position in a Possible Trump Administration?

 

Republican Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado jokingly said she has her eye on a cabinet position should former President Donald Trump win the 2024 election.  

As the Colorado Republican passed by Native Voice One on the third day of the Republican National Convention, the hosts asked who she thought should be Secretary of the Interior in a possible Trump administration. 

“I think Lauren Boebert needs to be the secretary of Interior,” she said with a laugh. “President Trump, I would like to be secretary of Interior.”

She explained her reasoning. 

“I think this is actually one of the most important agencies within the federal government,” Boebert said. “Public lands are something that are very dear to me and I’ve spent a lot of time on our tribal lands with our chairman and our councilmembers with the Mountain Utes and the Southern Utes.”

The hosts, who were holding a live show as they asked Boebert, wondered if she thought the federal government should disperse Bureau of Land Management offices across the country. 

“I fought to keep that as the Bureau of Land Management regional Western headquarters and save 46 jobs so we could have boots on the ground,” said Boebert, referring to how under Trump, BLM headquarters moved to Grand Junction, but came back to D.C. in 2021 under Interior Secretary Deb Haaland. 

Westerners deserve a voice in decisions affecting their daily lives, and it would be wrong to move the Bureau back to a faceless building in D.C. since 99% of its lands are in the West.

I hope @SecDebHaaland listens to bipartisan Western stakeholders.https://t.co/zDc3iFPEzb pic.twitter.com/c0KmTvymwc— Rep. Lauren Boebert (@RepBoebert) July 24, 2021

Responding to the reports, Boebert and her team said it was a “tongue-in-cheek” remark made during an impromptu interview.

Again, this was a light-hearted, tongue-in-cheek comment from @laurenboebert during an impromptu interview.

She’s passionate about the issues covered by Interior but fully committed to representing #CO04 in 2025 and beyond. https://t.co/PwumSZSKq0— Drew Sexton (@drewsexton23) July 18, 2024

‘Democracy’ Democrats Destroyed For Staging a Coup Against Biden

 

President Joe Biden dropped out of the 2024 race for the White House Sunday afternoon after pressure from Democrats reached a fever pitch over the weekend. 

Advertisement

Biden, whose dead campaign centered on “protecting Democracy,” broke the news with a letter on Twitter and followed up with an endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris for the top of the ticket. 

pic.twitter.com/RMIRvlSOYw— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) July 21, 2024

But the Democrats who worked to oust Biden are being blasted for staging a coup, especially given their claims about saving Democracy. 

Joe just dropped out.

The Democratic elite, corporate media, and billionaire donors successfully pressured the candidate chosen by Democratic primary voters to drop out because he’s down in the polls and losing.

Democrats destroy democracy in pursuit of power. pic.twitter.com/mKOydeqDpM— KanekoaTheGreat (@KanekoaTheGreat) July 21, 2024

BREAKING: President Joe Biden has endorsed Kamala Harris to replace him as the democrat nominee for the 2024 election.

The announcement comes after the Democratic Party staged a successful “coup” on Biden.

“My very first decision as the party nominee in 2020 was to pick Kamala… pic.twitter.com/xOVU48bnx9— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) July 21, 2024

Joe Biden is not stepping down as nominee because he wants to, remember that. This was a coup and can happen to anyone that becomes President. We are under occupation by a deep state that wants permanent power.— Andrew Pollack (@AndrewPollackFL) July 21, 2024

And like that, @JoeBiden gives in to ⁦⁦@BarackObama⁩ and @SpeakerPelosi⁩. In the best tradition of defenders of democracy, they pulled off a coup. Now will they shiv @VP Harris? pic.twitter.com/Mix5U2pHya— Hugh Hewitt (@hughhewitt) July 21, 2024

Back-room donors, Democrat elites, and their stenographers in the mainstream media conspired in this direct attack on democracy by successfully forcing out the candidate who secured the necessary votes to serve as the general election candidate.

As I have consistently said, it…— Elise Stefanik (@EliseStefanik) July 21, 2024

At this unprecedented juncture in American history, we must be clear about what just happened. The Democrat Party forced the Democrat nominee off the ballot, just over 100 days before the election.

Having invalidated the votes of more than 14 million Americans who selected Joe…— Speaker Mike Johnson (@SpeakerJohnson) July 21, 2024

Sunday, July 14, 2024

Assassination porn and the sickness on the left

 If we were leftists and we were to use leftist tropes to editorialize the recent attempt on Trump’s life, then we would frame the assassination attempt in the following way:

We have witnessed for years blatant exceptions to the once-common custom that we don’t normalize the imagined killing of any president or presidential candidate and thus lower the bar of violence.
Subscribe to The JNS Daily Syndicate by email and never miss our top stories
By signing up, you agree to receive emails from JNS and allied pro-Israel organizations.

But the left constantly makes Trump an exception. Now, it is as if the imagined killing of Trump had been mainstreamed and become acceptable in a way inconceivable of other presidents.

(Do we remember the rodeo clown who merely wore an Obama mask during a bull riding contest and was punished by being permanently banned by the Missouri State Fair authorities?)

So, since at least 2016, there has been a parlor game among leftist celebrities and entertainers joking (one hopes), dreaming, imagining and just talking about the various and graphic ways they would like to assassinate or seriously injure Trump:

By slugging his face (Robert De Niro), by decapitation (Kathy Griffin, Marilyn Manson), by stabbing (Shakespeare in the Park), by clubbing (Mickey Rourke), by shooting ( Snoop Dogg), by poisoning (Anthony Bourdain), by bounty killing (George Lopez), by carrion-eating his corpse (Pearl Jam), by suffocating (Larry Whilmore), by blowing him up (Madonna, Moby), by throwing him over a cliff (Rosie O’Donnell), just by generic “killing” him (Johnny Depp, Big Sean) or by martyring him (Reid Hoffman: “Yeah, I wish I had made him an actual martyr.”).

Or should we deplore the use of telescopic scope imagery, given that the left blamed Sarah Palin for once using bullseye spots on an election map of opposition congressional districts, claiming that such usage had incited the mass shooting by Jared Lee Loughner?

Yet recently, POTUS Joe Biden was a little bit more graphic and a lot more literal.

In a widely reported call to hundreds of donors last week, Biden boasted: “I have one job, and that’s to beat Donald Trump. I’m absolutely certain I’m the best person to be able to do that. So, we’re done talking about the debate, it’s time to put Trump in a bullseye.”

“In a bullseye”?

At least Biden did not go back to the full Biden beat-up porn of the past (e.g., “If we were in high school, I’d take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him.” “The press always asks me, ‘Don’t I wish I were debating him?’ No, I wish we were in high school—I could take him behind the gym. That’s what I wish.”).

Then there is the question of the Secret Service and one’s political opponents. Given the tragic history of the Kennedys, why in the world did the Biden administration not insist that independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. be accorded Secret Service protection? Because his candidacy was felt to be disadvantageous to Biden?

And why just this April would the former head of the January 6th Committee and 2004 election obstructionist Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) introduce legislation ridiculously entitled “Denying Infinite Security and Government Resources Allocated toward Convicted and Extremely Dishonorable (DISGRACED) Former Protectees Act” to strip Secret Service protection for former President Trump, who by this April was the leading presidential candidate?

Had Thompson’s bill passed, would that not have been confirmation for a potential shooter to feel his task was just made much easier?

But in a wider sense, if the common referent day after day on the left is that Trump is another Hitler (cf. a recent New Republic cover on which Trump is literally Photoshopped as Hitler), then it seems reckless not to imagine an unhinged or young shootist believing that by taking out someone identical to one of the greatest mass murderers in history, he would be applauded for his violence?

So, is their logic: shoot Trump and save six million from the gas chambers?

After all, The New Republic defiantly explained their Hitler-Trump cover photo this way: “Today, we at The New Republic think we can spend this election year in one of two ways. We can spend it debating whether Trump meets the nine or 17 points that define fascism. Or we can spend it saying, ‘He’s damn close enough, and we’d better fight.’”

Well, New Republic, recently someone took you up on your argument that Trump was “damn close enough” to Hitler and so he likewise chose to “fight”—albeit with a semi-automatic rifle.

If, ad nauseam, a Joy Reid is screaming about Trump as a Hitlerian dictator (“Then let me know who I got to vote for to keep Hitler out of the White House”) or Rachel Maddow is bloviating about studying Hitler to understand Trump, then finally the message sinks in that a mass murderer is about to take power—unless…

Finally, the idea, if true, that bystanders spotted a 20-year-old on a nearby roof with a gun, a mere 130 yards from Trump, and in vain warned police of his presence, is surreal.

Is it all that hard for the Secret Service to post a few agents on the tops of a few surrounding buildings closest to the dais, or at least coordinate with local law enforcement to do the same?

That is a no-brainer. Whoever made the decisions concerning the proper Secret Service security details for presidential events should be immediately fired.

Democrats Can’t Admit Biden Is Too Old, Their Whole Leadership Is Too Old

 

Nancy Pelosi supports Joe Biden. That’s not a shocking statement, Pelosi has always put party over country. But this time, she’s also defending herself. If Biden, 81, is too old to serve, what does that say about Pelosi, 84? Democrats have to cover for Joe Biden because to admit he’s too old to do the job would be to admit their whole leadership is too old to do the job.

I realize Democrats in the House of Representatives have “new” leadership, with Hakeem Jeffries being the new Minority Leader and…can you name any of the others? Honestly, can you?

If I’d said Pelosi was still the leader of the Democratic Caucus in the House would you have noticed that isn’t technically true? I’d bet not.

It’s true, however, that on paper, anyway, Jeffries and not Pelosi is the Minority Leader. You’d never know it by the amount of attention from the media one gets over the other. And you’d never know Katherine Clark of Massachusetts is the number 2 Democrat, their “whip,” because both Clark and Jeffries are non-entities, tokens the old guard has pretended to pass the torch to in order to give the impression that new blood is now running the show.

Jeffries is 53, Clark 60, the “former” No. 2 Democrat, Steny Hoyer, is 85, and James Clyburn, the “former” No. 3 is 83. Both Hoyer and Clyburn, like Pelosi, are running again this year. It seems that maybe that torch has grown into their hands the way a morbidly obese grows into a couch, making it impossible to pass.

How can people older than Joe Biden publicly call for someone younger than them to step aside, or down, because he’s too old? They could – it’s politics, the only industry outside of media where hypocrisy is its lifeblood and currency – but they won’t because they’d be afraid someone would notice. 

As a kid, my bedtime was 9 p.m. It sucked. I was the youngest of 5, which meant my bedtime was before everyone else, with the exception of my sister just older than me. One day, my sister and I were sitting behind my dad’s recliner watching TV hoping to sneakily stay up past our bedtime (we tried all the time). One day it worked. When 9:30 p.m. came around, we were sent to bed, but we’d snuck an extra half hour, or we thought. 

Turns out, it was just that one day – the family watched whatever sitcom it was that started at 9 p.m. and they let us join in only on that day. We thought we’d gotten away with it, but they’d really just changed the rules they set, which is what parents do. 

Democrats are trying to reset the rules for everyone, in real time, with very little justification or sense to be made out of how they’re changing them. 

It’s hard to set and hold someone to standards you know it’s unlikely you yourself may be able to obtain. The people who hold the key to Joe Biden’s remaining president are older than he is, which the exception of Chuck Schumer, a relative newborn at 73. 

But to get rid of Biden they have to do it under the banner of “It’s unfortunate, but he’s just too old. This is a young person’s game,” or some such line of BS. They have to do it that way because the alternative is to admit there is something wrong with the President of the United States, and they, and everyone close to them, knows it and knew it for a long time. 

Biden’s breakdown wasn’t overnight – it wasn’t a thrown rod or seal that gave way, it was a long process visible by casual observers. There is no excuse, and no lie, that will absolve the people closest to him, who all swore otherwise very, very recently, to explain away how they “missed” it. Anyone who pointed it out was immediately chastised as either wrong (if they were of the left) or a complete liar (if they were on the right). 

Advertisement

You can’t gloss over that.

Democratic Party leaders are too old to play the “Biden is too old” card, and complicit in the fraud perpetrated on the country to be able to tell the public the truth now. They’re stuck, and deserve to be. They did this to us, it’s only fair they do something almost as destructive to themselves.