Trump Revealed Why He Dropped an F-Bomb in His Easter Post.

 The Left had an intense meltdown over the weekend, speculating that President Trump was sick. Even more absurd, they used a July 2024 clip of Trump’s motorcade at a hospital as evidence. You can't just run old clips, like the one from when Trump was shot in Butler, Pennsylvania, and claim there’s speculation he’s at Walter Reed. He wasn’t—the US Marine standing outside the West Wing was your sign that the president was inside. 

🚨 NOW: A Marine Sentry is STILL posted outside the White House West Wing, signifying President Trump is inside

News outlets from all sides of the aisle have confirmed this, yet scumbags online keep trying to say 47’s at Walter Reed Hospital

Fake News! pic.twitter.com/1b8WdB12V6— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) April 4, 2026

As of 5:04pm ET, there's Marine sentry standing guard outside the West Wing, which means President Trump is present in the Oval Office

Trump had "Executive Time" on his public schedule starting at 8:00 am today. The White House issued a lid for press at 11:08 a.m pic.twitter.com/iLtxEWsnWf— Selina Wang (@selinawangtv) April 4, 2026

A Marine sentry is standing at the door of the West Wing as of 1:50pm, indicating the president is working inside. pic.twitter.com/UYGDhQeJJA— Emma Nicholson (@emmacnicholson) April 4, 2026

Well, today’s Easter Egg Roll event featured vintage Trump—vibrant, energetic, and very much alive and well. The Democrats and their losing influencers are eager for their Joe Biden moment, who looked decrepit and senile, fading before our eyes. The White House Easter Bunny didn’t have to lead Trump around, as the holiday critter had to do with President Drool-in-Soup.  

🚨 LMAO! Trump to kids at the Easter Egg Roll: “I could sign autographs for you guys, and then tonight, you could sell them for $25,000 on eBay!” 🤣

“Biden would use the AUTOPEN... he was incapable of signing his name, so they'd follow him around with this big machine. You know… pic.twitter.com/KJS0dgA3NN— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) April 6, 202

TRUMP: "What about the rescue that took place yesterday?"

"In most instances, you're really not able to go in."

INCREDIBLE JOB! pic.twitter.com/6OAcd0qef1— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) April 6, 2026

Trump joked about Biden’s use of an autopen while talking with kids at the event. He was looking at their artwork. He shushed the press because he wanted to hear the band, and he slapped around reporters, calling PBS a bunch of lunatics and not being overly concerned about dropping an F-bomb in his Easter post on social media. He noted that everyone, including the reporter who asked the question, has heard that word or worse, so calm down.  

"Only making a point," Trump said regarding his use of profanity in the post. "I think you've heard it before."

President Trump just ROASTED a PBS reporter 🔥

"Who are you with?"

REPORTER: PBS.

"Well, that's a radical left group of lunatics if you will."pic.twitter.com/PD6tWva23V— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) April 6, 2026

🚨 WOW! President Trump just MIC DROPPED this reporter

Q: "Mr. President, how would it not be a war crime to strike Iran's bridges and power plants?!"

TRUMP: "Because they KILLED 45,000 people! It could be as much as 60,000!"

"They kill protesters. They're ANIMALS. And we have… pic.twitter.com/IxehvNH9PX— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) April 6, 2026

🚨 President Trump just DUSTED an MSM reporter clutching her pearls over his Truth Social post telling Iran to “open the f*cking Strait.”

All it took was one line.

REPORTER: “Why did you use such vulgar language in that Truth Social post?”

TRUMP: “Only to make my point.”

“I… pic.twitter.com/mxqn3pmFD4— Overton (@overton_news) April 6, 2026
Advertisement

POTUS politely shushed us and told us he wants to listen to the band 😂 pic.twitter.com/aaPplrxpoU— Mary Margaret Olohan (@MaryMargOlohan) April 6, 2026

He also provided some updates on the rescued weapons systems officer who was saved after being shot down in Iran on Good Friday. 

Pope Leo's Flawed War Doctrine

 Pope Leo XIV used part of his Palm Sunday message to castigate the United States for attempting to stop Iran from becoming a nuclear power and threatening the world with mass destruction. In doing so, the "American Pope" confused the real enemy in the war.

Addressing thousands in St. Peter's Square, the Pope claimed that God rejects the prayers of leaders who wage war. He called the Iran war "atrocious" violence that cannot be justified by faith. He further said that God doesn't hear the prayers of people whose "hands (are) full of blood." Does he not include Iran's maniacal regime which has murdered Americans directly and through proxies, as well as tens of thousands of their own people? Does the Pope believe the Muslim god doesn't hear prayers asking him to destroy Jews, Israel, and the United States?

The Pope favors "diplomacy" over war, but you can't negotiate with evil. Recall how that worked with Adolf Hitler in Munich and more recently with North Korea, which has nuclear weapons because several American presidents refused to do what President Trump is doing to Iran.

Leo said Jesus is the "King of Peace" and is deaf to those initiating armed conflict, citing the Book of Isaiah. He ignores the bloody conflicts between the Israelites and many tribes and nations God directly ordered them to kill (even children) in order to claim the Promised Land.

The Pope also suggested that no one can use God to justify war. This appeared to be a direct response to Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, who had prayed for "overwhelming violence" in the name of Jesus earlier in the week. He's right about that, but would the Pope also condemn Iran's leaders for claiming to know the will of their god? Vladimir Putin is targeting civilians in Ukraine, and Nigerian Muslims are killing Christians by the thousands. The Pope is not known for highlighting those atrocities. In his view it appears only America is doing evil things.

American presidents, beginning with George Washington, have appealed to God to justify their policies and bless America. Washington believed the revolution's fate rested on God's favor.

Abraham Lincoln openly and privately sought Divine guidance for the nation's survival, famously stating he knew the Lord was "on the side of the right." His Second Inaugural Address could have been read in the churches of his day. His famous qualifying line was that "...my concern is not whether God is on our side; my greatest concern is to be on God's side, for God is always right."

In announcing the D-Day invasion of France on June 6, 1944, President Franklin Roosevelt closed his national radio address with a heartfelt prayer that conceded the certain cost of the operation: "Almighty God: Our sons, pride of our nation, this day have set upon a mighty endeavor, a struggle to preserve our Republic, our religion, and our civilization, and to set free a suffering humanity. ... Some will never return. Embrace these, Father, and receive them, Thy heroic servants, into Thy Kingdom."

Supreme Allied Commander General Dwight Eisenhower prayed the invasion would lead to victory over the Germans.

Gen. George Patton, faced with bad weather leading up to that fateful day, asked God to "Grant us fair weather for battle. Graciously hearken to us as soldiers who call upon Thee that, armed with Thy power, we may advance from victory to victory, and crush the oppression and wickedness of our enemies and establish Thy justice among men and nations."
Advertisement

The Pope seems to be equating war against evil regimes that murder tens of thousands of innocents with a country that is trying to stop them. Would he have preferred more negotiations with Hitler, or waiting until Iran developed nuclear weapons with the ability to strike Israel, Europe, and the U.S.?

President Trump has engaged in a pre-emptive strike against an evil regime. People can pray he will succeed without the fear of having blood on their hands. Contrary to the Pope's assertion, God is likely not plugging His ears.

Wisdom From America’s Founders: Government Isn’t Evil, But…

 “The aim of every political constitution is, or ought to be, first to obtain for rulers men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue, the common good of the society, and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous whilst they continue to hold their public trust.” – James Madison

Government isn’t evil. People are evil, not institutions or things. An army, a gun, isn’t evil, but they certainly can be, and have been, used by evil people, for evil purposes. And this describes governments down through history as well.

I have often said that government is a “necessary evil.” That isn’t quite accurate; it is, sadly, “necessary.” If all men were angels, Mr. Madison said, we wouldn’t need government. But, obviously, all men aren’t angels, thus some restraining force is required to curb what evil men do. Governments should be established for that purpose, and it is a legitimate one. The apostle Paul, in Romans 13, describes the reality of our world even today by talking about the rationale for government and what our response to it should be. Even Jesus’s “render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s” recognizes the truth that government is required in this present evil age.

But while government itself isn’t evil, it can, as noted, do evil things—if it is controlled by evil men. And that has, way too often in human history, been the case. One of the great temptations that plagues some humans is the desire for power, the ambition to control others and make them do what the megalomaniac wants them to do. And, of course, down through history, such power-mad individuals have gained control of governments and used their governmental power to do much evil. And it is obviously the case in our world today, too.:

Thus, James Madison’s statement at the beginning of this article is so important. Our Founding Fathers knew history, and Madison wrote his words based on the history of mankind—and governments—up to his day. Sadly, the past 250 years, and especially the last 100 years of leftist governments, have only—once again—proved the brilliance of our Founders and how accurate they usually were.

Because governments can, and have (nearly always) been used for at least some nefarious purposes, the first aim of a political constitution, Madison tells us, is to ensure that wise, virtuous people are selected to govern. “Since the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom,” it is essential that virtuous people be put into positions of power over others. People who do not fear God are not wise, and they can be, and usually are, very destructive and harmful to others, especially if given government power. Again, one only needs to look at the last 100 years of communist governments—and Democratic Party-run American cities—to see the truth of this. True wisdom produces true virtue, and there is almost none of either in today’s Democratic Party. If Americans elect unwise, unvirtuous people into government, we are headed for serious trouble. Indeed, such people have caused too many of the problems the country now suffers.

But notice Madison’s statement that it’s not only necessary to ensure wise, virtuous people are selected to govern, but the second goal is to make sure such people are always in government. No man, Madison said in another place, should be entrusted with too much power. He knew history. He knew what humans tend to do when they have power, when they have control of government. And so, it was the desire of our Founding Fathers to make certain the power-hungry gangsters did not get into positions of power—that only virtuous, wise (i.e., God-fearing) individuals do—and then, to ensure only such people remain there.
Advertisement

Otherwise, we get what we see in the Deep State and the rest of the world’s governments today.

It is impossible, of course, to quantify how much good or evil government does. When it supports and adheres to the laws of God, it will do good. Madison again: “The future and success of America is not in this Constitution, but in the laws of God upon which this Constitution is founded.” Our Founders not only knew and understood history, they knew that God established eternal principles of truth that never change and must be respected by all humans and institutions, including government. The Left, the Democrats, hate this philosophy, of course, arguing for an ever-evolving, ever-changing world where they can decide what is “virtuous” and “wise,” and rule in conjunction with their vision of what man should be and ought to become. And if it costs hundreds of millions of lives in the process, so be it. “They are all going to die anyway,” Joseph Stalin said.

When government leaders refuse to respect the laws of God…well, again, look at leftism in America and the world over the past several decades.

Government isn’t evil; people are. And thus, as James Madison warned, we should be very careful about whom we give the power of government to. We need to learn from our Founders, but we never do. And it is quite obvious why the Left hates them so much. The Left loves power; thus, loves government. And all we have to do is look at the last 100 years to witness what the godless, unvirtuous Left does when it obtains the power it craves.

Nothing Terrifies Democrats More Than a Little Transparency

 Sunshine is the best disinfectant, but serious scrutiny so concerns some Democrats that you’d think they, themselves, were the infection. Democrats would like you to think they’re nothing but a naked body behind a thin sheet of Saran Wrap – totally transparent and honest. But dig just a little and that clear wrap becomes aluminum foil. Democrats are terrified of a little scrutiny, and should tell you a whole lot.

Eric Swalwell, the, gassy, buffoonish Congressman from California who regularly steps into a field of metaphorical rakes, even in friendly interviews, is absolutely terrified that the FBI might release their file of the Bureau’s investigation into his being honey-potted by the Chinese Communist Party. In the past, Eric has insisted he was completely exonerated after he was targeted by our enemy, so why would the release of information the FBI gathered that led to that conclusion scare him?

That’s an important question to ask, especially given how Swalwell was a very loud voice in the calls for the Epstein files to be released. He wanted everything out in that case, mostly so his fellow Democrats could weaponize every garbage scrap of paper in it, no matter who stupid or fraudulent it clearly was. Eric doesn’t want that to happen to him. 

There’s also the reality that the only person’s word we have to go on when it comes to just how “sweet and innocent” he was in the affair is him. Granted, he could be stupid enough to not know, but he could also be lying. After all, why would a moderately attractive woman want to have anything to do with him in nature? It was pretty obvious he was played, but the extent to which he was (and by extension, us, since he would have betrayed all of us, inadvertently or not) we don’t know. That file might help us understand.

But he’s running for Governor of California, so that he’s terrified and threatening to sue to keep those secrets sealed tells you pretty much everything, doesn’t it? He’s previously denied anything sexual happened – surely Fang Fang wishes that were true – but won’t go into any details about any of it or give interviews with anyone with the integrity to ask about it; he’s just hoping to run out the clock.

Maybe he will be able to do it, too. Time will tell, just as time will tell if the people of California will support a Forrest Gump with honey pot problem who pays his wife for “child care” for her own kids. All kinds of gross, those Swalwells…

But the Swalwells aren’t the only trash in the Democrats’ dumpster. On the other side of the country, Westly Moore – who goes by Wes to hide his rich kid upbringing – the Governor of Maryland wants you to know he has nothing to hide…while being terrified at the prospect of anyone looking into the probably fiction he has woven about his own life.

Westley served in the military and talks about it often. But he won’t release his military records, for some reason. He swears his service was honorable, even being awarded some medals. Only he wasn’t, at least not at the time he claimed it. Weirdly, it was “awarded” later, after the “mistake” of him not having been given it was noticed, or so we’re told. Don’t know too much more about his service, beyond what he’s claimed. 

If Westley’s file backs up his story, why wouldn’t he want it released? 

But when the Baltimore Sun decided to ask some questions about the state’s Governor and his biography, the Moore-ons ran to Semafor for protection. 

Pro-tip: If you’re a “news” organization and members of one party run to you for cover and security when they’re facing tough questions, you’re doing something wrong. When it works, you’re an embarrassment. 

Their headline, “Maryland’s biggest newspaper is going after the governor’s 2028 campaign.” 

Why is a media outlet vetting a Democrat who was never really vetted somehow “news” or “going after” that politician? What happened to that “We speak truth to power” crap the media always cries when they’re screaming at the President? 

Gone. Semafor worked intimately with Moore’s people to preemptively deflect any questions about his biography, his service, his family and his fortune. That’s a whole lot of work for someone with nothing to hide. 

Realistically, Semafor should have been asking these questions, or demanding answers to stories like those uncovered by the Washington Free Beacon showing Westley’s claims that his great-grandfather was run out of the country by the KKK were completely made up. But that’s too much like work, and way too honest for a left-wing media that serves more as a security blanket for “progressive” politicians and an emotional tampon for Democrats desperately searching for a savior.
Advertisement

If basic information about your life coming out has you terrified, you probably shouldn’t be anywhere near the levers of power. If you have something to hide, feel free to hide it in the private sector. But if you’re afraid of people you seek to represent getting a peek beyond how you’ve chosen to represent yourself, maybe you’re the problem…

Sec. Markwayne Mullin's Newest Proposal Should Have the Left Terrified

 Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin unveiled a new proposal on Monday night to eliminate Customs and Border Patrol at international airports in sanctuary cities, effectively ending all international travel from the location.
Advertisement

NEW: In interview w/ colleague @BretBaier, DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin floats the idea of stripping CBP/customs officers from airports in large sanctuary cities as retaliation for refusing to cooperate with the federal government. International travelers wouldn’t be able to…— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) April 6, 2026

DHS Secretary Mullin raises the possibility of pulling CBP and customs officers from airports in large sanctuary cities, citing lack of cooperation with the federal government and funding refusals.

International arrivals would be unable to clear customs at those airports.

“It’s… pic.twitter.com/wdYNlNIcr1— Open Source Intel (@Osint613) April 6, 2026

🚨 HOLY CRAP! DHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin reveals sanctuary cities may lose CBP-CUSTOMS at airports until they comply

This would effectively BLOCK international travel there

DO IT! FAFO! pic.twitter.com/GtKbF9WCap

"Should sanctuary cities be processing Customs into their city? I'm…— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) April 6, 2026

“If they are a sanctuary city, should they really be processing customs into their city?” Mullin asked Fox News’ Bret Baier. “Seriously, if they are a sanctuary city and they are receiving international flights, and we’re asking them to partner with us at the airport, but once they walk out of the airport, they’re not going to enforce immigration policy? Maybe we need to have a really hard look at that because we need to focus on cities that want to work with us.”

His proposal would end international travel for countless major hubs of travel in blue cities, like Los Angeles and New York.

Immigration policy has taken center-stage in national politics, as DHS continues on a nearly two-month long shutdown. Democrats have refused to come to the negotiating table, and have claimed that they will only fund the department if Congress agrees to essentially end the deportation of illegal immigrants by requiring a judicial warrant and forbid ICE from operating at polling places to protect their illegal immigrant voters.

The shutdown saw massive lines develop at airports around the country after an exodus of TSA workers who missed multiple paychecks, which led to President Donald Trump ordering ICE to begin security operations to alleviate the pain.

Trump has ordered his administration to find the funds necessary to pay the government employees of the department, many of whom have gone with intermittent pay since the historically-long government shutdown last fall.