Sunday, December 15, 2024

Only Three Members Show Up for Ousted Squad Members Farewell Speeches

 

Just three “squad” members showed up to the farewells of ousted members who lost their Democratic primaries this year, Reps. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) and Cori Bush (D-MO). The two Democrats delivered their outgoing speeches to an empty congressional floor with only fellow squad members Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) being present. 

Bowman’s progressive stance on issues is said to be the culprit for his devastating loss. The person who pulled the fire alarm to stall a vote earlier this year has become so unpopular that AOC canceled an appearance she had planned with him on Elected Day. Bowman was also criticized for referring to Israel’s war against Hamas as a “genocide” against Palestinians. 

In the case of Bush, she was the victim of her own self-inflicted wounds. According to GovTrack, Bush ranks as one of Missouri's least effective Congress members, with only a few of her bills advancing out of committee. During her time in office, the Department of Justice quietly launched an investigation into her bodyguard, questioning whether he provided any legitimate work despite receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars from her official office. Bush also committed several notable blunders, including confusing Memorial Day with Veterans Day in a social media post, struggling to understand the tax code during inquiries, and voicing unsolicited opinions on racial issues related to specific criminal cases.


The fighting within the squad caused friction among its members, which threatened their chance of a majority. 

"Nobody who cares about them tried to help, tried to stop them, tried to say, ‘Hey, there’s a better way. You don’t need to do this. You can advocate for your position without alienating the vast majority of voters,'” a Democratic lawmaker told Politico. “If you’re going to start huge fights as opposed to governing,” the person said, “there are consequences.”

Two of the Most Liberal TV Talking Heads Make Stunning Admission About the GOP Sending Illegal Aliens to Martha's Vineyard

 

Round of applause for Govs. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) and Greg Abbott (R-TX)! 

Two of Hollywood’s biggest liberals just admitted that Republicans bussing illegal immigrants to Democrat-led states was the “smartest” thing they could have done. 

Former daytime talk show host Katie Couric and American political strategist for the Democratic Party Jessica Tarlov praised the GOP’s move of shipping illegal aliens to the Democrat governor’s doorstep when the effects of the Biden-Harris Administration’s immigration crisis were at its worst. 

“I thought it was a stunt when they started bussing migrants to Martha's vineyard ... it was the smartest thing they ever did,” Tarlov said. 

Couric recalled a friend telling her that she had a friend living in Florida who loved what DeSantis did. She admitted that the mainstream media ignored the crisis at its “peril.” 

The move sparked nationwide outrage after Republicans argued that Democratic leaders should experience the consequences of their immigration policies. As a result, they sent them to “sanctuary cities” such as  New York and Washington, D.C., to show how their left-wing policies place a strain on resources and law enforcement. They argued that supporters of illegal immigration should be responsible for dealing with the consequences that come with rolling out the red carpet for them. 

In 2022, DeSantis organized several flights and buses that shipped illegal immigrants to blue states, including the swanky city of Martha’s Vineyard, with each load estimating around 50 to 100 undocumented immigrants. 

Abbott, on the other hand, began a controversial program in 2021 to bus illegal immigrants from Texas to Democratic-led cities and states. The number of aliens transported varied, but reports suggest that thousands had been sent to these destinations as part of the governor’s border security initiative.

Time Magazine Asked Trump What He Thought Was Kamala’s Worst Error in the 2024 Race. His Answer is Epic.

 

Time Magazine has named Donald J. Trump their ‘Person of the Year.’ It’s not shocking—it leaked hours before it was made official, which didn’t sit well with the publication or its readers. Don Lemon was significantly perturbed that Trump was awarded this honor again—he won it in 2016 as well. Of course, MSNBC thinks the award is worthless because Trump won it. The best part is that we don’t care what these clowns believe, and neither does Trump. The media has never been more dismissed, mocked, or flat-out wrong since the 2016 election (via WaPo):

Donald Trump is TIME’s Person of the Year https://t.co/IjP5W2otV5 pic.twitter.com/CVHX9o0DB3— TIME (@TIME) December 12, 2024

 “Time Magazine?! What are you DOING?!

Don Lemon throws a temper-tantrum over Trump being selected as “Person of the Year.” pic.twitter.com/ox5P2W0eTw— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) December 12, 2024

Time’s editor in chief, Sam Jacobs, wrote that it was not a difficult choice this year: “Since he began running for President in 2015, perhaps no single individual has played a larger role in changing the course of politics and history than Trump. … On the cusp of his second presidency, all of us — from his most fanatical supporters to his most fervent critics — are living in the Age of Trump.” 

Trump rang the opening bell of the New York Stock Exchange about two hours after the Time announcement, in an event to celebrate the honor. 

NYSE chairman Jeffrey Sprecher said as he introduced Trump that markets had hit record highs since Election Day. 

You can read the interview transcript here, but he was asked about Kamala Harris and what mistakes she made during her 2024 run. Trump’s response was gold: 

WOAH. Trump just showed up to the New York Stock Exchange with members of his cabinet in front of his giant TIME Person of the Year cover.

America is back.  pic.twitter.com/2u2vtC8kzp— johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) December 12, 2024

Speaking of Kamala Harris. What do you think were her worst mistakes in the campaign?  

Taking the assignment. Number one, because you have to know what you’re good at. 

Well, there is no argument there. Kamala’s disastrous 2020 run was a preview of what would have happened if she had ever been able to win the Democratic nomination. She obtained it via coup after top Democrats pushed Joe Biden out of the 2024 race. We quickly learned she couldn’t do it, and the lack of media interviews was because the woman couldn’t string two coherent thoughts together.

Tim Walz Wants Us to Feel Sorry For Him Because He Has to ‘Pay Bills’

 

Failed Democratic Vice Presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz (D-Minn.) is trying to gain sympathy after a devastating loss by crying about the struggles of managing bills and responsibilities he faces as the country’s “poorest” vice president candidate that Americans face daily. Walz shed light on how it felt to be the least richest person to run alongside a presidential candidate despite making over $100,000 annually, while most Americans bring in far less than that. 

During an interview, Walz said he thought it was a “flex” that he had to “pay bills” like all Americans and appeal to voters because he is “poor.” 

“I thought it was a real flex when the Wall Street Journal pointed out that I might have been the least wealthy person to ever run for vice president,” he said. “I thought that would be something people say, well, this guy knows where we’re coming from. He’s had to pay his bills.” 

According to Time Magazine, Walz had a total income of about $299,000, with $135,000 coming from pensions or annuities. The average American makes only $63,795 a year, which is on the higher end. In some states, it’s as low as $50,000. The publication noted that Walz’s net worth as of 2024 stands at just over $1 million. But, yes, we should all feel sorry for him. 

NEW: Tim Walz said he thought it was a “flex” that he was the poorest VP candidate in history, says he thought people would respect that he has to “pay his bills.”

They still don’t get it.

“I thought it was a real flex when the Wall Street Journal pointed out that I might have… pic.twitter.com/OTkOFT8ACt— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) December 13, 2024

Social media users realized they dodged a bullet and offered no sympathy to Walz. 

So he thought he was “flexing” by virtue signaling his relative poverty?

Maybe don’t spend all your money going to China Tim.— Brick Suit (@Brick_Suit) December 13, 2024

A few hundred thousand votes away from being worth $10M in 4 years.

Poor guy.— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) December 13, 2024

How does the poorest VP candidate in history afford >30 trips to China??— Booker9e (@booker9e) December 14, 2024

Well Tim. You’re wrong. We don’t like communists— DeborahRN 🇺🇸 (@DebRN1953) December 14, 2024

Kamala Harris for CA Governor? Here’s What Her Close Aides Think

 

In a bold and unprecedented move, failed presidential candidate Kamala Harris is reportedly eyeing California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s job. The move would significantly shift her political trajectory after she was largely defeated by President-elect Donald Trump in the 2024 election. However, conservatives argue that her time as California attorney general would mirror her agenda as a governor. 

According to a CNN report, several top aides are urging Harris to run for governor in 2026 despite polling as one of the most unliked vice presidents in U.S. history. The report noted that the decision will depend on whether Democrats believe the outgoing vice president has a strong chance of winning the party’s presidential nomination in what is expected to be a highly competitive primary in 2028. Half the party appears to be split on whether Harris should try her chance at the White House again or take a different path. 

The governor’s race, meanwhile, looks like a lay-up: Harris was elected statewide three times and served 10 years combined as state attorney general and US senator, and when asked by CNN, several major candidates made clear either directly or through aides that they would likely step aside if she got in. In CNN’s conversation with over a dozen current and former Harris advisers and other top California Democratic players, the only consensus around the vice president is that she likely can’t do both, since that would essentially require launching a presidential campaign soon after being sworn in as governor. Harris will need to decide very soon after Trump’s inauguration if she will quickly give up on her dream of being president – which she feels got short shrift from the circumstances of this year – and instead go for a job that, while one of the most powerful in American politics, would clearly be a fallback.

The report highlighted the tight timeline Harris would need to follow if she ultimately decides to run for Newsom’s seat. It pointed out that, at the latest, she must have a clear agenda for a potential governorship by the summer of 2025. 

“What she’s been saying to people over the last couple of weeks, donors, other supporters that she’s been talking with, is you haven’t seen the last of me, I’m not going quietly into the night,” CNN’s Issac Devore said. “Advisors, people close to her, are debating about what that means. They do not want her final official act ever to be essentially certifying Donald Trump’s win over her, especially four years after January 6. And so they look at this governor’s race in California in 2026, and it seems to them like a layup, essentially, that she would probably clear the field or mostly clear the field, and she would get to be governor of California.”

A former advisor to Harris said that a run for governor would be more like a “capstone” rather than a “stepping stone,” adding that “if you’re thinking of running for president in 2028, the worst thing you can do is run for governor in 2026.”

Meanwhile, another believed that Harris could win the presidential race once Trump was out of office and that the gubernatorial race would be distracting.

Let The WNBA Die Already

 

It’s difficult to think of an analogy to use when trying to illustrate how the media and players are trying to destroy the WNBA without realizing it. Not because it’s particularly impossible, but because they’re all so outdated. To hear the Democrats say it, racism is everywhere and “white supremacy” controls everything in the country, if not the world. But it’s really not. It still exists, but it does so in insignificant ways as to not really matter. Yet, getting back to the WNBA, the press around, and hatred of Caitlin Clark is racist. Just let the league die already.

First off, let me say that I am not the target demographic for the WNBA. Not only am I a man, but I don’t enjoy basketball – once you’ve seen a 7-foot-tall guy slam dunk a basketball one time, you’re pretty much seen it every time. I get the skill, and I don’t have the skill, but I also don’t really want to have the skill. There are far too many timeouts, traveling, fouls (called and missed) and seemingly always comes down to the last 2 minutes, which takes as long as the rest of the game had, for me to be interested. It’s like watching an NFL game with a flag-happy referee crew: it’s boring.

That being said, people like it. The NBA is wildly popular and very profitable. The WNBA is none of those things. 

The league lost $40 million this year and considered that to be a victory because they expected to lose closer to $50 million.

The only reason they didn’t lose $10 million more is the rise of Caitlin Clark. 

Clark is white, and the media decided she would be “the star” of the league because of that fact. They started hyping her in college – “She’s scored more points in college than anyone, including Pete Maravich” was the first I’d heard of her. Never mind the fact that Maravich wasn’t allowed to play his freshman year thanks to rules at the time and there was no 3-point shot, Clark was the “greatest ever!!!”

Don’t get me wrong, my animosity is not directed toward Clark – she’s better than I could ever be at the game, but perspective and reality matter. The left was waiting for some player to hype and they wanted that player to be white. Why? Because they believe America is racist and would only accept a white player as a star. 

This is beyond stupid, of course, but it’s how the mind of Democrats work. The top player in baseball is from Japan, players in the NFL are majority black and it’s the most popular game in sports, while the NHL is full of Canadians and Swedes and isn’t even a blip on the radar. If the American public is into “white supremacy,” we really suck at it.

Clark go the full court press: magazine covers, TV profiles, more basketball cards selling for a small fortune than established athletes, and games all over TV. When her team came to town, the story was about her going to be there, being there, then having been there. It sold tickets and merchandise. But only hers.

The public bought the sizzle without realizing the steak was just ok. 

I don’t mean to say she’s not a good play, she is. But she was only the 7th in average points. Nothing to sniff at, but I bet no one in the media who’d hyped her could name any of the 6 players ahead of her. I bet not one single panel member on CNN whining about “white supremacy” being why she gotten so much attention could name one either. You’d think they learn them, if only to name drop and seem to be genuine. 

But they aren’t genuine, it’s performance art.

None of the energy from the left behind pushing Caitlin Clark was ever put behind a black player; they didn’t even try. That’s not Clark’s fault, it’s the fault of the left. And with literally all of the energy behind her, it only makes sense that there is no residual impact on anyone else and the rest of the league. Games not involving her are about as popular as the league was before her. 

Advertisement

Still, even team owners don’t get it and spend their time degrading Clark rather than expanding the case for the whole league. “Caitlin Clark was named Athlete of the year. Why couldn’t they have put the whole WNBA on that cover and said ‘The WNBA is the league of the year’?” asked Washington Mystics owner Sheila Johnson. (Honestly, I had to look up where the Mystics were from, which is a problem for the league that pre-dates Clark.) “Because when you just keep singling out one player it creates hard feelings. And so now you’re starting to hear stories of racism.”

Yes, it is racism. Racism by the left in elevating a rookie as the savior of the league because she is white, then racism of black players toward her rather than directing that animosity toward the people choosing a person to highlight because of their skin color. The only person who hasn’t done anything here is Clark herself, and she’s the one getting bodychecked and her eye gouged by bitter racists. 

I say let the league die. I was indifferent about its existence before, but the whining and victimhood by people lucky enough to play a game for a living about the one person bringing in the people necessary to grow the league and all of their salaries is just too much. So many stories about how “little” WNBA players are paid compared to NBA players are stupid – how many of the league’s players could make $100,000 in the non-sports world? The rookie starting wage is $76,535. How many people without an advanced degree make that much right out of college? Not many, and fewer still when you remove rich kids hired by their family’s business.

But they aren’t worth more. Rather than whine about the attention, accolades and endorsements Caitlin Clark is getting, practice and play better. The vast majority of players in the WNBA, Clark included (41.7), shoot well below 50 percent. You have to go to the 40th player on the league leader board for shooting percentage to get below 50 in the NBA. There are only 12 of the top 50 leaders in the WNBA above 50, with most just barely. 

In other words, the game itself is boring. I can watch my friends miss shots and I don’t have to be lectured about how horrible and racist everything is as I do it. 

The league won’t die – it’s subsidized by the NBA, at least in part, to distract from the womanizing of players – so they aren’t about to let it die. It is immune from reality, both economic and political. I guess I’ll just keep doing what I’ve been doing: not giving a damn, no matter how much its hyped or how loud the whining gets.

Monday, December 09, 2024

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal Hands Trump Some Good News

 

In a move that’s sure to be good news for the incoming Trump administration, a three-judge panel on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the federal government does in fact have the authority to carry out deportations, even if local officials object. The case actually comes from the first Trump administration, as The Center Square reported on Monday.

As the report explained:

At issue is an April 2019 executive order issued by King County Executive Dow Constantine, which directed county officials to prohibit fixed base operators on a county airfield near Seattle from servicing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement charter flights used to deport illegal foreign nationals.

Constantine’s order prohibited King County International Airport from supporting “the transportation and deportation of immigration detainees in the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, either traveling within or arriving or departing the United States or its territories.”

The airport is located next to a major ICE-Seattle base of operations.

The Trump administration at the time sued, arguing Constantine’s order violated the Supremacy Clause’s intergovernmental immunity doctrine and a World War II-era Instrument of Transfer agreement allowing the federal government to use the airport in King County.

A district court agreed, ruling in favor of the federal government. King County next appealed to the Ninth Circuit.

The Ninth Circuit panel affirmed the district court’s summary judgment that the order violated the Supremacy Clause and the Instrument of Transfer agreement.

The panel also held that the federal government had Article III standing to sue and “had two related concrete and individualized injuries.” The first is “the inability to conduct the charter flights – which has increased ICE’s operational costs – constituted a de facto injury that affected the United States in a particularized, individual way” and “an imminent risk of future injury from the Executive Order.”

The second is the federal government’s injuries “were fairly traceable” and “are likely, as opposed to merely speculative,” as a result of the order. Were there no order, “an FBO would resume servicing ICE charter flights,” the court notes.

Constantine’s order violated the intergovernmental immunity doctrine because it “improperly regulated the way in which the federal government transported noncitizen detainees by preventing ICE from using private FBO contractors at Boeing Field, and on its face discriminated against the United States by singling out the federal government and its contractors for unfavorable treatment,” the court held.

Reporting from The Seattle Times also noted that Kings County will not further appeal the decision, with a spokesperson mentioning in part that the county “will of course follow the court’s dictates.”

King County is one of those described as a “sanctuary city,” but the days of sanctuary cities being able to get away with covering for illegal immigrants are likely coming to an end. Even better news for the incoming Trump administration is that, as The Seattle Times also mentioned, a district-level federal court issued a similar ruling last year. 

The Ninth Circuit covers the more western states in the country, which are also among some of the most liberal and include many sanctuary cities when it comes to immigration. 

Not only will King County be “follow[ing] the court’s dictates,” but it looks like they’ll be eating plenty of crow as well, given that they hoped to be “leading the way,” as The Seattle Times noted: 

In 2019, under the first Trump administration, Constantine issued an executive order seeking to block the federal government from using King County International Airport (the formal name for Boeing Field) for flights deporting immigrants.

The order targeted private companies that fuel and maintain planes at the airport, ordering that future leases between the county and the companies would prohibit deportation flights.

At the time, county officials said it was likely the first attempt anywhere in the country by local officials to block ICE deportation flights, and they hoped to be “leading the way.”

“Deportations raise deeply troubling human rights concerns which are inconsistent with the values of King County, including separations of families, increases of racial disproportionality in policing, deportations of people into unsafe situations in other countries, and constitutional concerns of due process,” Constantine’s 2019 executive order said.

Tom Homan, named last month to be President-elect Donald Trump’s border czar, has made clear that there will be mass deportations of illegal immigrants. He has also repeatedly made clear that local officials are not to stand in his way, as was recently the case with Denver Mayor Mike Johnston (D), who threatened to stop deportations.

“He’s willing to go to jail. I’m willing to put him in jail,” Homan said, which led Johnston to soon after admit that he regretted his remarks.

Polling from CBS News, including before and after the November election, shows that a majority of Americans favor plans for mass deportations. Last week’s poll from The Economist/YouGov also showed that a majority or plurality of Americans across several demographics approve of Trump’s plan to build a border wall along the U.S.-Mexican border and that they believe he’ll actually carry through with such plans.

Why the Left Is Going Insane Over Trump’s Cabinet Nominees

 

Deflated by the resounding November defeat, the Left now believes it can magically rebound by destroying President-elect Donald Trump’s Cabinet nominees.

Many of Trump’s picks are well outside the usual Washington, D.C./New York political, media, and corporate nexus.

But that is precisely the point—to insert reformers into a bloated, incompetent, and weaponized government who are not part of it.

The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now

Trump’s nominee for FBI director, Kash Patel, is already drawing severe criticism.

Patel’s furious enemies cannot go after his resume, since he has spent a lifetime in private, congressional, and executive billets, both in investigations and intelligence.

Instead, they claim he is too vindictive and does not reflect the ethos of the FBI.

But what will Patel not do as the new director?

He will not serially lie under oath to federal investigators, as did interim FBI Director Andrew McCabe, a current Patel critic.

He will not forge an FBI court affidavit, as did convicted felon and agency lawyer Kevin Clinesmith.

He will not claim amnesia 245 times under congressional oath to evade embarrassing admissions, as did former FBI Director James Comey.

He will not partner with a foreign national to collect dirt and subvert a presidential campaign as the FBI did with Christopher Steele in 2016.

He will not use the FBI to draft social media to suppress news unfavorable to a presidential candidate on the eve of an election.

He would not have suppressed FBI knowledge that Hunter Biden’s laptop was genuine—to allow the lie to spread that it was “Russian disinformation” on the eve of the 2020 election.

He will not raid the home of an ex-president with SWAT teams, surveil Catholics, monitor parents at school board meetings, or go after peaceful, pro-life protesters.

Decorated combat veteran Pete Hegseth is another controversial nominee for secretary of defense.

What will Hegseth likely not do?

Go AWOL without notifying the president of a serious medical procedure as did current Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin?

Install race and gender criteria for promotion and mandate training in diversity, equity, and inclusion, or DEI?

Insinuate falsely that cabals of white supremacists had infiltrated the military—only to alienate that entire demographic and thus ensure the Pentagon came up 40,000 recruits short?

Oversee the scramble from Kabul, Afghanistan, that saw $50 billion in U.S. military equipment abandoned to Taliban terrorists?

Watch passively as a Chinese spy balloon traversed the continental United States for a week?

Allow the chairman of the Joint Chiefs to promise his Chinese communist counterpart that the People’s Liberation Army would first be informed if the president of the United States was felt to issue a dangerous order?

Rotate into the Pentagon from a defense contractor boardship and then leave office to rotate back there to leverage procurement decisions?

Oversee the Pentagon’s serial flunking of fiscal audits?

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump’s nominee to head the Department of Health and Human Services, is certainly a maverick. He may earn the most Democratic hits, given his former liberal credentials.

But what will RFK also not do as HHS secretary?

Oversee his agencies’ circumventing of U.S. law by transferring money to Communist China to help it produce lethal gain-of-function viruses of the COVID-19 sort—in the manner of Dr. Anthony Fauci?

Organize scientists to go after critics of mandatory masking and defame them?

Give pharmaceutical companies near-lifetime exemptions from legal jeopardy for rushing into production mRNA vaccines not traditionally vetted and tested?

Leave office to monetize his HHS expertise and thus make millions from the pharmaceutical companies?

Trump’s nominee for national intelligence director, former House member and military veteran Tulsi Gabbard, will soon be defamed in congressional hearings.

But what has Gabbard not done?

Joined “51 former intelligence authorities” to lie on the eve of the 2020 election that the Hunter Biden laptop “had all the hallmarks” of a Russian information/disinformation operation”—in an effort to swing the election to Joe Biden?

Lied under congressional oath like former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who claimed he gave only the “least untruthful answer” in congressional testimony?

Encourage the FBI to monitor a presidential campaign in efforts to discredit it—in the manner of former CIA Director John Brennan, who lied not once but twice under oath?

Fail to foresee the American meltdown in Kabul, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Hamas terrorist attacks on Israel, or the Houthis’ takeover of the Red Sea?

We are going to hear some outrageous things in the upcoming congressional confirmation hearings.

But one thing we will not hear about are the crimes, deceptions, and utter incompetence of prior and current government grandees.

The current Biden-Harris crew, not their proposed Trump replacements, prompted the sick and tired American people to demand different people.

Voters want novel approaches to reform a government that they not only no longer trust but also now deeply fear.

This Recent Development With Dems Only Shows the Extent of Their Sickness

 

A meeting of state Democratic chairs in Arizona was a whine fest of epic proportion, though no one seemed capable of grasping why Kamala Harris lost in 2024. The liberal bubble, as dense and insane as ever, laughably had liberals thinking that Harris was going to ride into DC with 400 electoral votes. Some of these people had Harris winning Florida. Harris didn’t win a single swing state and got handily trounced by President-elect Donald J. Trump. Outside this echo chamber, everyone knew trouble was ahead; spending a billion dollars and being unable to move the needle meant something was wrong. Outgoing Democratic National Committee Chair Jamie Harrison was adamant that the party should do what they ought to do when it comes to voter outreach: dump the ‘woke’ antics. 

I can’t believe I’m saying this, but the only person who made any sense was Martin O’Malley—yeah, remember him—who said that the Democratic Party only needs to revert to its pro-working class roots. That’s easier said than done—there are no working people within the Democratic Party, at least not in the circles where political strategy is dictated (via Politico): 

At a Hilton hotel outside of Phoenix, where Christmas carols piped into the lobby, state Democratic chairs gathered for their annual winter meeting. They weren’t frantic like they had been after Trump’s first stunning victory. They were exhausted. Even after Trump tapped the likes of Kash Patel and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to staff his government, they still weren’t ready to demonstrate in the streets or tune into liberal networks. 

[…] 

In a fiery speech, Harrison lambasted critics in his party who want to walk away from “identity politics.” Democrats began their meeting on Thursday with a “land acknowledgement,” a symbolic gesture that grants that the land a person is standing on previously belonged to Native Americans, which conservatives have derided as “woke.”

As Democrats tried to figure out a path forward, there was a quiet sense among some here that they wouldn’t be out of power for long. It was a stark contrast from people elsewhere in their party who are worried that a realignment could rob them of power for years. After all, these Democrats reasoned, Americans had voted for Trump before — and then quickly grew tired of him, as evidenced by the 2018 midterms and then again in the 2020 presidential election. They took comfort in the fact that voters this year supported liberal ballot initiatives and Democratic Senate candidates in states Trump won.

Native Americans shifted to the right, too. 

Democrats now look upon these voters as sewer trash. They’ve taken a position that they’re poor by choice and should suffer the consequences of not being part of their country club of snobbery, derision, and suffocating self-righteousness. These people think they’re right about everything because they have a degree. That’s not how this works, and most liberals are bonafide idiots. Only these people would bash working people for not being able to soak up the ludicrous price increases brought on by Joe Biden’s inflationary agenda. That’s like stoning a homeless person for not being able to buy a house. That’s how detached these people are. The good news is that the Democrats’ systemic dysfunction is the opportunity Trump and the GOP must exploit to get things done, namely on border security and ensuring the Trump tax cuts become permanent. 

The Democrats remain blind because they refuse to leave their comfort zone, which is what most voters hate about the Left. Their views make them unlikable, unapproachable, and all-around deplorable.

Is Trump Already Our De Facto President?

 The French president — whose government has been buffeted by chaos in recent days — invited President-elect Donald Trump to Paris to help commemorate the reopening of the iconic Notre Dame cathedral, after a damaging fire in 2019.  Trump accepted the invitation, meeting with a number of European leaders on the trip, having already huddled with other world leaders at Mar-a-Lago in recent days.  During the festivities, as Sarah noted over the weekend, a stream of dignitaries lined up to warmly greet the incoming American president, as cameras rolled.  These are striking images, both because of who is depicted in them, but also because of who wasn’t there.  One might be forgiven for watching this footage and assuming Donald Trump is already President of the United States — as relayed by one of his top State Department nominees:

One by one, world leaders rise to greet President Trump.

This is what respect for our President and country looks like.pic.twitter.com/6YKVjWFnqX— Monica Crowley (@MonicaCrowley) December 7, 2024


Another related clip:

President-Elect Donald Trump with French President Emmanuel Macron in Paris.

pic.twitter.com/WrEIJ4Be2R— America (@america) December 7, 2024


It is impossible to avoid juxtaposing these scenes with the reality that the current, sitting President of the United States was not in attendance at all.  These may be harsh comments, but they’re also inevitable and reasonably-founded observations:

Combination of Biden being feeble & needing to hide from the press after Hunter pardon with Trump having previously been president makes it very easy for world leaders to just ignore Biden now & go straight to Trump. https://t.co/G5tlB2gDuT— Dan McLaughlin (@baseballcrank) December 7, 2024

This is such a weird thing that it almost seems like Trump is already president when Biden still has 6 weeks left as president

Like… this is historically weird. It feels surreal. https://t.co/gnp2mECci8— PoIiMath (@politicalmath) December 8, 2024


The man who is nominally running the US government was represented in France by his wife and daughter, who even appeared to have gotten a bit chummy with Trump, in spite of everything that has transpired over the last four-plus years.  This could have been an awkward seating arrangement, but this isn’t an awkward photograph:

Jill and Ashley Biden chatting with Trump at Nôtre Dame. pic.twitter.com/kjTUfFsehm— Yashar Ali 🐘 (@yashar) December 7, 2024


The sitting president was elsewhere, having been shuffled off the world stage and hidden away by his team.  Perhaps they’re shielding him from questions and uncomfortable situations over his outrageous and shameless pardon-related lies and actions.  Perhaps he’s just literally not able to be in public without risking embarrassment:

WATCH: A much higher quality video of Biden’s nap during his meeting with world leaders in Africa.

Who’s running the country? pic.twitter.com/loUx6ru8Cp— Jake Schneider (@jacobkschneider) December 4, 2024

Biden shocks with long, wispy hair at White House Christmas tree lighting: ‘Ghosts of corruption past, present and future’ https://t.co/SHwl5INNeP pic.twitter.com/dB9xU8cw94— New York Post (@nypost) December 6, 2024


Biden’s polling numbers are bleak as he approaches the official end of his presidency.  As noted above, it already feels like his presidency is over, so much so that some people are already blaming the not-yet-president for current problems:

“These terrible things happened under the Biden administration and Lloyd Austin’s leadership. Therefore, Pete Hegseth must not be Secretary of Defense.”

LOL…wut? https://t.co/kq0WLvgypt— Bonchie (@bonchieredstate) December 5, 2024

Peak progressive virtue signaling is tipping your delivery driver 10% while assuming your driver is illegal and complaining that if he’s deported you can’t keep paying him below a living wage. https://t.co/5pjvMpw5S7— Bethany S. Mandel (@bethanyshondark) December 4, 2024


“Trumpflation.”  He’s weeks away from being inaugurated. I’ll leave you with this:

Makes my heart soar: ‘Amazing Grace’ sung at the Notre Dame Cathedral today. pic.twitter.com/yEmL7wgS87— Jan Jekielek (@JanJekielek) December 7, 2024

Wednesday, December 04, 2024

The Trump Counterrevolution Is a Return to Sanity

 

We are witnessing a historic counterrevolution after President Donald Trump’s victory, far different from his first election in 2016.

The orthodox and the supposed scripted future are now suspect. And they are likely to be dethroned—from the trivial to the existential.

Critics claim Trump has no mandate to stage such a counterrevolution. They argue that he did not win 51% of the popular vote or achieve a Reaganesque landslide in the Electoral College.

Yet all the initiatives he advanced and won on polled landslide public approval.

Despite being the target of Democrat lawfare for years, a defiant Trump promised to end an open border, massive illegal immigration, rising crime, and soaring prices. He pledged to slash government and its administrative state, terminate racial and gender identity politics, and restore deterrence abroad.

The people overwhelmingly wanted those messages but were waiting for an unorthodox messenger who would actually deliver them.

The Trump messenger reassured weary citizens that they were not crazy.

Instead, they had good cause to be sick of being talked down to by a media, academic, bureaucratic, and political elite that never earned nor deserved such self-appointed status.

The FBI, the CIA, and the Justice Department, not the massive crowds at rallies, were the ones truly out of control.

President Joe Biden was really suffering from dementia, not those who said he was.

Criminals with weapons are as deleterious to society as law-abiding citizens deprived of them.

It is not a thought crime to believe there are two sexes—not three or four or more. No one should be forced to buy an electric vehicle, disconnect their natural gas stove, or submit to racial or gender indoctrination sessions.

Americans should speak their minds and write what they wish without worry of being censored, blacklisted, ostracized, doxxed, or shadow-banned—or jailed.

Campuses are not oases of tolerance, disinterested inquiry, and free expression. They instead increasingly became overpriced indoctrination centers that shred the Constitution and graduate indebted students who know less—but are far more biased—than when they enrolled.

Trump and his MAGA appointees promise to slash over a trillion dollars from the annual federal budget, disbanding entire agencies.

Is the objection that an ever-expanding government—$37 trillion in debt, running nearly $2 trillion in annual deficits—should keep growing?

Trump pledges to reform the Pentagon—ending DEI Pentagon commissars and revolving-door corporate generalship.

He vows to hold the 4-star class responsible for the catastrophe in Afghanistan and to reenlist soldiers who were driven out due to draconian vaccination mandates or woke intolerance. Trump envisions changing the entire system of military procurement.

Does the status quo object on the grounds that our military leadership has been winning our wars abroad?

Is the Pentagon currently awash in eager recruits?

Has it stockpiled a huge surplus of shells, bombs, and rockets?

Trump promises historic deportations of the 12 million who destroyed the southern border and surged in without health or criminal audits.

Trump vows to rescue swamped social services and stop crimes by illegal alien felons.

Is that really worse than the Biden administration’s original massive importation of millions of illegal aliens, empowered by drug-importing and sex-trafficking cartels?

Who are the culpable? Those flagrantly mocking and breaking the law, or those vowing to enforce it?

Trump says he will deter enemies without bogging America down in “endless wars”—and did just that in his first four years as president.

Is the current alternative preferable to convincing enemies that there are few consequences to their aggression, sandbagging allies like Israel, or feeding the war in Ukraine without any plan of either winning or ending it?

The Trump revolution is also cultural and social. Shared class interests have replaced race, ethnicity, and gender chauvinism.

Athletes of all races are no longer taking a knee in protest of America’s supposed systemic racism during the national anthem. Sometimes they celebrate their scoring by doing honorific Trump YMCA/golf-swing dances on national television.

Enlistments to help craft the Trump counterrevolution are not always predicated on degrees, conventional resumes, or past lengthy government service. Race and gender do not determine qualifications alone. Nor does class.

Common sense, successful lives outside of government, and a desire to end the current nonsense count instead as better prerequisites.

For Trump, party identification, titles, and traditional prestige matter less as he is surrounded by an ideologically diverse cadre, including Elon Musk, Robert Kennedy, Jr., Dana White, Tulsi Gabbard, and Joe Rogan.

The country no longer must apologize incessantly for its past or present but can move on—content that it need not be perfect to be better than all the alternatives.

The age of flashing pronouns, renaming iconic landmarks, statue toppling, trashing the dead, vandalizing with impunity the campus library, or spouting antisemitic venom is passing.

So, another name for the Trump counterrevolution is a simple return to sanity.


Universities Have a 2025 Rendezvous With Reality

 

Universities have suffered a cataclysmic decline in public approval and support.

A Gallup poll taken this year found that only 36% of Americans polled either expressed “a great deal” or “quite a lot” of confidence in higher education—once the agreed-on touchstone to upward mobility.

Gifting to most universities has been down for two consecutive years.

There is zero intellectual diversity on most university campuses.

Speakers with conservative viewpoints are often either disinvited or shouted down—and worse.

The federally guaranteed student loan program is in shambles. Some $1.7 trillion in outstanding loans were taken out by half of all college students.

Nearly one-fifth are now not being paid back.

Marriage, child-rearing, and home ownership are all delayed by some 40 million indebted graduates, who can take decades to pay loans back.

The Biden administration demagogued the issue by illegally granting rolling student loan amnesties—to win votes just before both the midterm and general elections. That proposed debt relief would be covered by taxpayers, over half of whom never went to college.

The expansion of student loan debt roughly correlates with universities raising their annual costs higher than the rate of inflation—largely due to administrative bloat.

Although the U.S. Supreme Court recently struck down the practice of using race and gender to adjudicate applications and hiring, universities are already seeking ways to circumvent the ruling.

Asian and white Americans for decades have been systematically, overtly, and supposedly with justification, discriminated against by ignoring or not requiring test scores and downplaying grade point averages.

Stanford University may be representative of these crises.

In the 2020 election, 94% of Stanford faculty voted for the Joe Biden-Kamala Harris ticket. Four years later, some 96% of all Stanford-affiliated donations went to Democrats during the 2024 election season.

Former Stanford law professors Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried—parents of mega-Democratic donor and now imprisoned Sam Bankman-Fried, and recipients of millions in gifts from their felonious son—were reportedly heavily involved in either bundling large left-wing campaign donations or offering legal advice to their son’s bankrupt and Ponzi-like business.

In 2023, a federal judge was shouted down at Stanford Law School, his lecture aborted and then hijacked—by a Stanford diversity, equity, and inclusion administrator!

Former Donald Trump health advisor and Hoover Institution scholar Scott Atlas in 2020 was censured by the Stanford faculty.

Yet subsequent events supported Atlas’s prescient warning that a complete lockdown of the country and the shutdown of K-12 schools would not only not retard the COVID-19 epidemic, but would cause far greater economic, social, cultural, and health damage than the virus itself.

Two recent attempts to lift that censure failed—in part because some faculty claimed—that to do so would empower the Trump reelection bid!

In contrast, Stanford professor Jeff Hancock, who founded the “Stanford Social Media Lab,” boasts he researches ‘how people use deception with technology.” Yet when liberal Minnesota officials wanted such “experts” to support their new law banning “deep fake” technology at election time, they called in the expert deception-detector Hancock.

However, the references Hancock provided to prove his support for the law allegedly never existed.

In fact, the lawyers who challenged his online expertise argued his sources apparently were invented by artificial intelligence software like ChatGPT.

Who will police the deception police?

Last academic year, anti-Israel Stanford students with impunity violated university rules and camped out for months in the free speech area, shouting and disrupting passersby.

A small group of students occupied and trashed the president’s office, and another vandalized historic campus architecture.

After Oct. 7, a Stanford lecturer was suspended for singling out and targeting Jewish students in his classroom.

A Stanford faculty committee on antisemitism recently concluded, “The most existential problem at Stanford is the emergence of a general atmosphere in which Jewish and Israeli members of the Stanford community are denied dignity and respect based on their Jewish identities, denied treatment and protection afforded to other minority groups, and afforded equal respect and inclusion only if they denounce Israel in various ways and forms.”

Can out-of-control universities reform?

The incoming Trump administration has floated a variety of tough-love remedies.

They include predicating hundreds of billions of dollars in federal grants on campuses’ adherence to the Bill of Rights, taxing the income on universities multibillion-dollar endowments, and removing the federal government from the student loan business.

Recently, there have been a few hopeful signs that campuses are aware of the need to change.

At Stanford, a new president was hired, widely respected for his singular commitment to disinterested education and freedom of expression.

The SAT entrance exam is returning to many campuses and is still appreciated as crucial to most universities’ applications.

A number of partisan elite college presidents have resigned in disgrace.

So, hope springs eternal, even if it may be too little, too late.

After Biden Pardons Hunter, Trump Moves to Dismiss Hush Money Case

 

After President Joe Biden pardoned his son, Hunter, on Sunday, the legal team for President-elect Donald Trump made a request for Judge Juan Merchan to dismiss the hush money case. On May 30, Trump was found “guilty” on 34 felony counts in a sham trial held in New York City on hush money charges brought by Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg. What’s particularly noteworthy about the motion, from Monday, is that the second paragraph makes reference to the pardon of Hunter Biden.

Trump has filed his motion to dismiss the hush money case in Manhattan. It’s a 72-page document and the first mention of Hunter Biden’s pardon appears in paragraph #2.— erica orden (@eorden) December 3, 2024

The motion from Trump’s attorneys, Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, who have also been tasked for key roles in the Trump administration’s Department of Justice (DOJ), uses the pardoning of Hunter to further argue that the case be dismissed. 

As that motion read early on:

Yesterday, in issuing a 10-year pardon to Hunter Biden that covers any and all crimes whether charged or uncharged, President Biden asserted that his son was “selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted,” and “treated differently.” Ex. 81.1 President Biden argued that “raw politics has infected this process and it led to a miscarriage of justice.” Id. These comments amounted to an extraordinary condemnation of President Biden’s own DOJ. This is the same DOJ that coordinated and oversaw the politically-motivated, election-interference witch hunts targeting President Trump by disgraced Special Counsel Jack Smith, the other biased prosecutors in Smith’s Special Counsel’s Office (“SCO”), and others. This is the same DOJ that sent Matthew Colangelo to DA Bragg to help unfairly target President Trump in this empty and lawless case.

Since DA Bragg took office, he has engaged in “precisely the type of political theater” that President Biden condemned. Bragg v. Jordan, 669 F. Supp. 3d 257, 271 (S.D.N.Y. 2023). This case is based on a contrived, defective, and unprecedented legal theory relating to 2017 entries in documents that were maintained hundreds of miles away from the White House where President Trump was running the country. There are no “aggravating factors” here, other than those arising from DANY’s misconduct. Ex. 81. Thus, this case should never have been brought, particularly during a period when DA Bragg’s failure to protect this City from pervasive violent crime frightens, threatens, and harms New Yorkers on a daily basis. And this case would never have been brought were it not for President Trump’s political views, the transformative national movement established under his leadership, and the political threat that he poses to entrenched, corrupt politicians in Washington, D.C. and beyond.   

Wrongly continuing proceedings in this failed lawfare case disrupts President Trump’s transition efforts and his preparations to wield the full Article II executive power authorized by the Constitution pursuant to the overwhelming national mandate granted to him by the American people on November 5, 2024. Under Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593 (2024) and related caselaw, DANY’s disruptions to the institution of the Presidency violate the Presidential immunity doctrine because they threaten the functioning of the federal government. Local elected officials such as DA Bragg have no valid basis to cause such disruptions, which also violate the Supremacy Clause. Consequently, the federal Constitution is an absolute “legal impediment” to further proceedings, CPL § 210.20(1)(h), and the case must be immediately dismissed.  

There were plenty of concerns about the case that Bragg’s office brought against Trump from the start, including when it comes to the role of politicized DOJ that the motion mentioned above, with Matthew Colangelo, formerly a top employee at the Biden-Harris DOJ, leaving to work for Bragg’s office and prosecute Trump.

While Judge Merchan has moved to indefinitely delay sentencing, as Townhall has been covering, Bragg’s office still stubbornly looks to hold onto the conviction by merely agreeing to a pause, as CNN noted in their reporting of such a motion to dismiss

Reporting from The Hill also includes a statement from Steven Cheung, who served as communications director for the Trump-Vance campaign and will have such a role in the incoming administration. Trump’s lawyers also laid out other arguments in favor of dismissing the case:

Steven Cheung, Trump’s spokesperson and incoming White House communications director, in a statement called the new brief a “powerhouse motion” that “provides every possible chance for Judge Merchan to do the right thing and end what remains of this charade immediately.” 

“Wrongly continuing proceedings in this failed lawfare case disrupts President Trump’s transition efforts and his preparations to wield the full Article II executive power authorized by the Constitution pursuant to the overwhelming national mandate granted to him by the American people on November 5, 2024,” Trump’s attorneys wrote in the filing. 

When it comes to the suggestion that Bragg’s office focus on a “renewed opportunity to put an end to deteriorating conditions in the City and to protect its residents from violent crime,” it’s worth reminding that there’s been a serious mishandling of priorities. In addition to the rise of hate crimes in New York State, especially New York City, Bragg’s office meanwhile prioritizes targeting political opponents like Trump and heroic figures like Daniel Penny, who has been charged for the death of Jordan Neely, a homeless man who was terrorizing people on the subway. 

The legal cases against Trump have been failing, though those who brought such charges against him still look to be holding on in many ways. Special Counsel Jack Smith has dropped all of his cases against Trump, though he did so without prejudice so that they may still be theoretically brought back. He is also looking to finalize a report for Attorney General Merrick Garland to release.

Joe Biden is a genius.

 

OK, he’s actually a doddering old fool who can’t remember his own name half the time, but we know he has moments of lucidity here and there. We also know that he wanted a second term and his fellow Democrats pushed him to the side. Why he would be shocked that the party that uses “old white men” as a pejorative wouldn’t really be behind an old white man is beyond me, yet he apparently was.

From the moment he stepped aside, though, Biden seemed bound and determined to scuttle Kamala Harris’s nomination.

Sure, it may have been gaffe after gaffe – or, such as when he said Harris had been intimately involved in economic discussions just as she was trying to distance herself from Biden’s economic policies, he might have actually thought it would help – but over a month ago, I commented how it looked just like he was trying to sabotage her.

I’m not saying that Biden is actively trying to sabotage Harris’s campaign without looking like he was.

I’m just saying I can’t think of that much he’d do differently if he were actively trying to sabotage her campaign without looking like he was.— Tom Knighton (@TheTomKnighton) October 30, 2024

Plus, despite everyone calling Trump “literally Hitler,” what did Biden do immediately after the election? Have Trump come on over and have a nice sit-down chat with him, something you don’t do with someone who is considered the most evil man to ever live reincarnated.

Then we have the Hunter Biden pardon.

You’ve heard all about it by now. You know what was said, what Biden’s “reasoning” was, and how he’d repeatedly claimed that he would do no such thing, only to turn out that he lied yet again.

But in that same moment, he set a precedent that President-elect Donald Trump can now use as he wants. The problem was that the prosecution was political? That can be said about pretty much every January 6 defendant. Trump could pardon them all, and over a broad period to make sure they couldn’t be prosecuted for anything else later on.

Others have been prosecuted because of their affiliation with Trump. Steve Bannon, for example, or Roger Stone. While Bannon has done his time and it was only a misdemeanor, it would send a signal how he’s running things. Trump held off in pardoning Stone last go-around because it would be a political liability, but that’s not as true today as it was in 2020.

Honestly, from the moment when he left the campaign trail, Joe Biden has done so much that has benefitted Trump that it’s hard for me not to look at some of it and wonder if he was really just trying to hurt the Democrats.

I wouldn’t be surprised if he did. He’d been a good Democrat for decades, working his way up the food chain and finally making it to the top, only to have his party turn on him. If that were me, and I were actually lucid enough of the time, I’d probably think about ways to get back at them without being too obvious.

Of course, that all assumes there’s enough of Biden left to actually be that calculating. I can’t rule out that his handlers are resentful of being ousted with the old goat, so it might be them working through Biden, but that feels a little too tin-foil hat for me.

Then again, the difference between “established fact” and “conspiracy theory” seems to be about six weeks, so anything’s possible.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal Hands Trump Some Good News

 

In a move that’s sure to be good news for the incoming Trump administration, a three-judge panel on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the federal government does in fact have the authority to carry out deportations, even if local officials object. The case actually comes from the first Trump administration, as The Center Square reported on Monday.

As the report explained:

At issue is an April 2019 executive order issued by King County Executive Dow Constantine, which directed county officials to prohibit fixed base operators on a county airfield near Seattle from servicing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement charter flights used to deport illegal foreign nationals.

Constantine’s order prohibited King County International Airport from supporting “the transportation and deportation of immigration detainees in the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, either traveling within or arriving or departing the United States or its territories.”

The airport is located next to a major ICE-Seattle base of operations.

The Trump administration at the time sued, arguing Constantine’s order violated the Supremacy Clause’s intergovernmental immunity doctrine and a World War II-era Instrument of Transfer agreement allowing the federal government to use the airport in King County.

A district court agreed, ruling in favor of the federal government. King County next appealed to the Ninth Circuit.

The Ninth Circuit panel affirmed the district court’s summary judgment that the order violated the Supremacy Clause and the Instrument of Transfer agreement.

The panel also held that the federal government had Article III standing to sue and “had two related concrete and individualized injuries.” The first is “the inability to conduct the charter flights – which has increased ICE’s operational costs – constituted a de facto injury that affected the United States in a particularized, individual way” and “an imminent risk of future injury from the Executive Order.”

The second is the federal government’s injuries “were fairly traceable” and “are likely, as opposed to merely speculative,” as a result of the order. Were there no order, “an FBO would resume servicing ICE charter flights,” the court notes.

Constantine’s order violated the intergovernmental immunity doctrine because it “improperly regulated the way in which the federal government transported noncitizen detainees by preventing ICE from using private FBO contractors at Boeing Field, and on its face discriminated against the United States by singling out the federal government and its contractors for unfavorable treatment,” the court held.

Reporting from The Seattle Times also noted that Kings County will not further appeal the decision, with a spokesperson mentioning in part that the county “will of course follow the court’s dictates.”

King County is one of those described as a “sanctuary city,” but the days of sanctuary cities being able to get away with covering for illegal immigrants are likely coming to an end. Even better news for the incoming Trump administration is that, as The Seattle Times also mentioned, a district-level federal court issued a similar ruling last year. 

The Ninth Circuit covers the more western states in the country, which are also among some of the most liberal and include many sanctuary cities when it comes to immigration. 

Not only will King County be “follow[ing] the court’s dictates,” but it looks like they’ll be eating plenty of crow as well, given that they hoped to be “leading the way,” as The Seattle Times noted: 

In 2019, under the first Trump administration, Constantine issued an executive order seeking to block the federal government from using King County International Airport (the formal name for Boeing Field) for flights deporting immigrants.

The order targeted private companies that fuel and maintain planes at the airport, ordering that future leases between the county and the companies would prohibit deportation flights.

At the time, county officials said it was likely the first attempt anywhere in the country by local officials to block ICE deportation flights, and they hoped to be “leading the way.”

“Deportations raise deeply troubling human rights concerns which are inconsistent with the values of King County, including separations of families, increases of racial disproportionality in policing, deportations of people into unsafe situations in other countries, and constitutional concerns of due process,” Constantine’s 2019 executive order said.

Tom Homan, named last month to be President-elect Donald Trump’s border czar, has made clear that there will be mass deportations of illegal immigrants. He has also repeatedly made clear that local officials are not to stand in his way, as was recently the case with Denver Mayor Mike Johnston (D), who threatened to stop deportations.

“He’s willing to go to jail. I’m willing to put him in jail,” Homan said, which led Johnston to soon after admit that he regretted his remarks.

Polling from CBS News, including before and after the November election, shows that a majority of Americans favor plans for mass deportations. Last week’s poll from The Economist/YouGov also showed that a majority or plurality of Americans across several demographics approve of Trump’s plan to build a border wall along the U.S.-Mexican border and that they believe he’ll actually carry through with such plans.