We would be better off if Gadhafi were in charge right now
Sen. Ted CRUZ: Both Donald and Senator Rubio have agreed with both
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama: in Libya, they agreed with the
Obama/Clinton policy of toppling the government in Libya. That was a
disaster. TRUMP: I was in favor of Libya?
I never discussed that subject. We would be so much better off if
Gadhafi were in charge right now. If these politicians went to the beach
and didn't do a thing, and we had Saddam Hussein and if we had Gadhafi
in charge, instead of having terrorism
all over the place, at least they killed terrorists, all right? And I'm
not saying they were good--because they were bad, they were really
bad--but we don't know what we're getting.
You look at Libya right now, ISIS, as we speak, is taking over their
oil. As we speak, it's a total mess. We would have been better off if
the politicians took a day off instead of going into war.
Cease-fire in Syria only if all parties involved
Q: Do you support the ceasefire in Syria? CRUZ: We're hopeful that
the violence will cease, but there's reason to be highly skeptical.
Russia has enhanced its position because of Obama's weakness in the
Middle East, weakness in Syria. TRUMP: I don't because it not working and the countries aren't agreeing to it and the rebels aren't agreeing and Syria is not agreeing. It's a meaningless ceasefire. I would love it, but all parties have to be part of it.
FactCheck: Supported Iraq invasion in 2002; opposed in 2003
Trump has claimed that he opposed the Iraq War before the invasion
began--as an example of his great judgment. But in a 2002 interview with
Howard Stern, Donald Trump said he supported an Iraq invasion. In an
interview on Sept. 11, 2002, Stern asked
Trump directly if he was for invading Iraq. "Yeah I guess so," Trump
responded. "I wish the first time it was done correctly."Trump has
repeatedly claimed that he was against the Iraq War before it began,
despite no evidence of him publicly stating
this position. Trump's comments on Stern's show are more in line with
what he wrote in his 2000 book, The America We Deserve, where he
advocated for a "principled and tough" policy toward "outlaw" states
like Iraq.Asked at the CNN town hall about the Stern interview, Trump said, "I could have said that. I wasn't a politician. It was probably the first time anyone has asked me that question. By the time the war started, I was against it, and shortly thereafter, I was really against."
We've spent $5T in the Mideast and gotten nothing
Gov. Jeb BUSH: Donald Trump wants to accommodate Russia. Russia is not
taking out ISIS. They're attacking our team, the team that we've been
training and the team that we've been supporting. It is absolutely
ludicrous to suggest that Russia could be a
positive partner in this. I would restore the military; the sequester
needs to be reversed.Q [to Trump]: You said that you could get along very well with Vladimir Putin. You did say let Russia take care of ISIS.TRUMP: Jeb is so wrong. You fight ISIS first. You have to knock 'em out. You decide what to do after, you can't fight two wars at one time. If you listen to him, that's why we've been in the Middle East for 15 years, and we haven't won anything. We've spent $5 trillion dollars in the Middle East with thinking like that. We've spent $5 trillion dollars; we have to rebuild our country. We have to rebuild our infrastructure. you listen to that you're going to be there for another 15 years. You'll end up with world war three.
Get rid of ISIS, quickly: dry up their oil & their money
Q: You've said, "we've got to get rid of ISIS, quickly, quickly." How?TRUMP:
Well, four years ago, I said, bomb the oil and take the oil. And if we
did that, they wouldn't have the wealth they have right now. Now, we're
doing little pinpricks.
If somebody's driving a truck, they give notice to the person driving
the truck, "we're going to bomb." If they don't get out of the truck,
the truck sails away with the oil. We don't want to bomb the oil,
because we don't want to pollute the atmosphere.
Can you imagine General Douglas MacArthur or General Patton saying we
can't bomb because we're gonna hurt the atmosphere? You have to knock
the hell out of the oil. And you have also back channels of banking. You
have people that you think are our great
allies in the Middle East, that are paying tremendous amounts of money
to ISIS. So we have to stop those circuits. So between the oil and the
banking, you will dry them up. But it should have been done four years
ago, not now.
Assad is a bad guy, but his replacement could be worse
Gov. Jeb BUSH: We should have a no fly zone in Syria.TRUMP: Assad is a bad guy, but we have no idea who the so-called rebels--nobody even knows who they are. Carly FIORINA: Governor Bush is correct. We must have a no fly zone in Syria.
TRUMP: So, I don't like Assad. Who's going to like Assad? But, we have no idea who these people, and what they're going to be, and what they're going to represent. They may be far worse than Assad. Look at Libya. Look at Iraq. Look at the mess we have after spending $2 trillion dollars, thousands of lives, wounded warriors all over the place--we have nothing. And, I said, keep the oil. And we should have kept the oil, believe me. We should have kept the oil. And, you know what? We should have given big chunks of the oil to the people that lost their arms, their legs, and their families, and their sons, and daughters, because right now, you know who has a lot of that oil? Iran, and ISIS.
Let Russia make moves in Syria; it's a quagmire
Q: Let's turn to ISIS and what should the United States do about it?TRUMP:
But we're going to have to do something very strong over there. We're
going to have to take away the energy, the fuel, the money from ISIS,
because, in the case of ISIS--
I've been saying this for years. We have to stop the source of money.
And the source of money is oil.Q: So you'd step up the campaign against ISIS even though you believe that Vladimir Putin is getting stuck in a quagmire by going in?
TRUMP: Well, I'm not looking to quagmire, I'm looking to take the oil. The Middle East is one big, fat quagmire. If you look at the Soviet Union, it used to be the Soviet Union. They essentially went bust and it became Russia, a much smaller version, because of Afghanistan. They spent all their money. Now they're going into Syria. I'm all for Russia going in and knocking and dropping bombs on ISIS. As far as I'm concerned, we don't have to have exclusivity on that.
We should have demanded a deal with Kuwait to liberate them
When Kuwait was attacked by Saddam Hussein, all the wealthy Kuwaitis ran
to Paris. They didn't just rent suites--they took up whole buildings,
entire hotels. They lived like kings while their country was occupied. Who
did they turn to for help?
Who else? Uncle Sucker. That's us. We spent billions of dollars sending
our army to win back Kuwait. Our people were killed and wounded, but the
Iraqis went back to their country. About two months after the war, several Kuwaitis came up to my office. They told me, "We want to invest outside the United States." We had just handed them back their country! They were watching TV in the best hotel rooms in Paris while our kids were fighting for them. And they didn't want to invest in this country?
How stupid are we? Why didn't the United States make a deal with them that outlined that how they would pay for us to get their country back for them? They would have paid anything if just asked.
Blunder to announce withdrawal timetable from Afghanistan
Unfortunately, it may require boots on the ground to fight the Islamic
State. I don't think it's necessary to broadcast our strategy. (In fact,
one of the most ridiculous policy blunders President Obama has
committed was to announce our timetable
for withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan.) If military advisers
recommend it, we should commit a limited--but sufficient--number of
troops to fight on the ground.
Afghanistan war made a mess, but troops need to stay
Trump said the US was right to invade Afghanistan after the Sept. 11
terrorist attacks--a reversal of his position earlier this month when he
called the war a "mistake.""We made a mistake going into Iraq. I've
never said we made a mistake going into
Afghanistan," Trump told CNN. Trump said on October 6 that he believed
entering Afghanistan was a mistake and worried about U.S. forces getting
stuck there."At some point, are they going to be there for the next 200 years? It's going to be a long time," Trump said, when asked about Afghanistan. "We made a terrible mistake getting involved there in the first place. We had real brilliant thinkers that didn't know what the hell they were doing. And it's a mess. And at this point, you probably have to stay because that thing will collapse about two seconds after they leave."
Trump first signaled his backtrack when he said Afghanistan is "where we should have gone," meaning the US should have focused its attention on Afghanistan over Iraq.
Strengthen military, but act defensively
Q: You say, in personal relations, you're a counterpuncher. You don't
hit until you are hit. Is that a good way to think about the way you
would use military force as a president?TRUMP: I'm the most
militaristic person on your show. I want to have a
much stronger military. I want it to be so strong that nobody is going
to mess with us. I want to take care of our vets, who are treated
terribly, like third-class citizens.Q: Well, let's take an example of some case where you may or may not use military force. It turns out Assad apparently used chemical weapons on his own people.
TRUMP: Well, you know, the time to have done it would have been when he drew the line in the sand.
Q: So, you would have done it in that case?
TRUMP: I might have gone in. Now it's such a mess over there, with everybody involved, and the airspace is very limited. It's not that big of an area. The airspace is very limited. So are we going to start World War III over Syria?
Good that Russia has entered Syrian conflict
Q: We've seen Russia go heavily into Syria this week. Yesterday, Hillary
Clinton; today, John Kasich; both say we should establish a no-fly zone
in Syria. Would you do that?TRUMP: I don't think so.
I think what I want to do is I want to sit back and I want to see what
happens. You know, Russia got bogged down, when it was the Soviet Union,
in Afghanistan. They thought that would be quick and easy and they'll
go in and they'll clean it up...Q: You think Putin's falling into a trap?
TRUMP: I think it's not going to be great for them, there are so many traps. There are so many problems. When I heard they were going in to fight ISIS, I said, "Great."
Q: But they're not bombing ISIS.
TRUMP: Well, not yet. But they don't want ISIS going into Russia, either. So they're not bombing them yet.
Radical violent Islam that must be feared, not Islam itself
I feel strongly that Muslims are excellent. I know so many Muslims that
are such fabulous people. But there is a problem. I mean, there's no
question about it. And, you know, we can be politically correct, and we
can say there is no problem whatsoever.
But the fact is, there is a problem with some. And it's a very severe
problem. And it's a problem that's taking place all over the world. But I
have such great respect and love for so many of the people. I mean,
they are great people.
I'm pro-military but I opposed invading Iraq in 2003
TRUMP: I am the only person on this dais that fought very, very hard
against us going into Iraq, because I said going into Iraq--that was in
2003, you can check it out--I'll give you 25 different stories. In fact,
a delegation was sent to my office to
see me because I was so vocal about it. I'm a very militaristic person,
but you have to know when to use the military. I'm the only person up
here that fought against going into Iraq. Sen. Rand PAUL: I've made
my career as being an opponent of the
Iraq War. We have to learn sometimes the interventions backfire. The
Iraq War backfired and did not help us. We're still paying the
repercussions of a bad decision. Dr. Ben CARSON: When the issue occurred in 2003, I suggested to President Bush that he not go to war. So I just want that on the record.
If Obama had attacked Syria, we wouldn't have refugees now
Somehow, [President Obama] just doesn't have courage. There is something
missing from our president. Had he crossed the line and really gone in
with force, done something to
Assad--if he had gone in with tremendous force, you wouldn't have
millions of people displaced all over the world.
Opposed Iraq war in 2004 & predicted Mideast destabilization
In July of 2004, I came out strongly against the war with Iraq, because
it was going to destabilize the Middle East.
And I'm the only one on this stage that knew that and had the vision to
say it. And that's exactly what happened. And the Middle East became
totally destabilized.
Disgraceful deal gives Iran a lot & gets nothing for us
Q: On Obama's Iranian nuclear deal?TRUMP: I would be so different
from what you have right now. Like, the polar opposite. We have a
president who doesn't have a clue. I would say he's incompetent, but I
don't want to do that because that's not nice.
But if you look at the deals we make, whether it's the nuclear deal with
24 hour periods--and by the way, before you get to the 24 hours, you
have to go through a system. You look at Sgt. Bergdahl, we get Bergdahl,
a traitor, and they get 5 of the big,
great killer leaders that they want. We have people in Washington that
don't know what they're doing. Now, with Iran, we're making a deal, you
would say, we want out our prisoners. We want all these things, and we
don't get anything. We're giving them
$150 billion dollars plus. I'll tell you what, if Iran was a stock, you
folks should go out and buy it right now because you'll quadruple--this,
what's happening in Iran, is a disgrace, and it's going to lead to
destruction in large portions of the world
Bomb the oil fields in Iraq to take on ISIS
Q: You said you want to bomb the oil fields in Iraq to take on ISIS?A: The only way you're going to beat them is that. You know why they're rich? Because they have the oil.Q: But I don't think the government of Iraq would want us to bomb their oil fields.
A: There is no government in Iraq. The so-called government in Iraq went to Iran to meet with Iran. Iran is going to take over Iraq. That's as simple as that. I don't care about the government of Iraq. They're totally corrupt. Who cares?
Boots on the ground to fight ISIS
What does Donald Trump believe? Islamic State and Iraq: Send a limited number of combat troops on the ground.In
early 2015, Trump told CPAC that he felt the U.S. may need "boots on
the ground" to fight the Islamic State.
Soon after, he clarified to Fox News that he would send limited numbers
of troops if all of his military advisers recommended it.
I said "don't hit Iraq," because it destabilized Middle East
I said it very strongly, years ago, I love the military, and I want to
have the strongest military that we've ever had, and we need it more now
than ever. But I said, "Don't hit Iraq," because you're going to
totally destabilize the Middle East. Iran is
going to take over the Middle East, Iran and somebody else will get the
oil, and it turned out that Iran is now taking over Iraq. Think of it.
Iran is taking over Iraq, and they're taking it over big league.
We spent $2 trillion in Iraq, $2 trillion. We lost thousands of lives,
thousands in Iraq. We have wounded soldiers all over the place,
thousands and thousands of wounded soldiers. And we have nothing. We
can't even go there. We have nothing.
And every time we give Iraq equipment, the first time a bullet goes off
in the air, they leave it.Last week, I read 2,300 Humvees--these are big vehicles--were left behind for the enemy. 2,300 sophisticated vehicles, they ran, and the enemy took them.
Hit ISIS hard and fast
From the dispute over funding the Department of Homeland Security ("the
answer is 'we're going to fund, we're going to keep doing it"), to
repealing ObamaCare ("which is a total lie"), Trump just wants to see a
more aggressive approach.When asked
about ISIS, Trump said he "would hit them so hard and so fast that they
wouldn't know what happened." He later claimed his approach would be one
that historical military figures General Douglas McArthur and General
George Patton would approve of.
Take $1.5T in oil from Iraq to pay for US victims
Mr. Trump said that the United States should "take" $1.5 trillion worth
of oil from Iraq to pay for the cost of the war and give $1 million to
each of the families that lost someone in the effort--
sparking applause from the thousands gathered for the American
Conservative Union's 40th annual Conservative Political Action
Conference (CPAC).
Iraq should pick up the tab for their own liberation
When you do someone a favor, they say thank you. When you give someone a
loan, they pay you back. And when a nation like the US sacrifices
thousands of lives of its own young servicemen and women and more than a
trillion dollars to bring freedom to the
people of Iraq, the least the Iraqis should do is pick up the tab for
their own liberation.How much is it worth to them to be rid of the
bloodthirsty dictatorship of Saddam Hussein and to have gained a
democracy? In reality, that's a priceless gift.
When I say they should pay us back, I'm not even talking about cash out
of their pockets. All I'm asking is that they give us, temporarily, a
few flows of oil--enough to help pay us back and help take care of the
tens of thousands of families and
children whose brave loved ones died or were injured while securing
Iraqi freedom.But does Iraq do that? No. In fact, they've made it clear they have no intention of ever doing so. Ever. The ingratitude of Iraq's leadership is breathtaking.
Stop Iran's nuclear programs by any & all means necessary
America's primary goal with Iran must be to destroy its nuclear
ambitions. Let me put them as plainly as I know how: Iran's nuclear
program must be stopped--by any and all means necessary. Period. We
cannot allow this radical regime to acquire a nuclear
weapon that they will either use or hand off to terrorists. Better now
than later!Pres. Bush authorized a covert program to "undermine the
electrical and computer systems" at Natanz, Iran's uranium enrichment
facility. What came out of that initiative
was the Stuxnet cyber worm. It was unleashed against Iran's nuclear
centrifuges and made them spin so fast they destroyed themselves. The
operation was very successful and destroyed roughly 1/5 of Iran's
centrifuges.
No one knows for sure how many months or years we put back on Iran's
nuclear clock. Some analysts say 6 months, others 1 or 2 years, But
that's the point: the clock is still ticking.
John McCain's actions in Vietnam were not "heroic"
In a televised interview, Donald Trump--in his assessment of the
candidates--wondered aloud about McCain's war record. Reading the McCain
story, Trump opined, one might hesitate to call McCain's experience
"heroic."
Of course, McCain never pointed to his own experience as heroic--quite
the contrary. "Incidents of surpassing courage and defiance were
commonplace.and they made my own attempts at rebellion seem minor in
comparison."
Throughout Faith of My Fathers, McCain referred to the heroism of his
comrades, whose actions and bravery, McCain suggests, far exceeded his.
He was fortunate to serve in the company of heroes, who lifted up and
improved McCain, and the others, by their selfless example.
Use force to stop North Korean nuke development
[In a Trump presidency], North Korea would suddenly discover that its
worthless promises of civilized behavior would cut no ice. I would let
Pyongyang know in no uncertain terms that it can either get out of the
nuclear arms race or expect a rebuke
similar to the one Ronald Reagan delivered to Ghadhafi in 1986. I don’t
think anybody is going to accuse me of tiptoeing through the issues or
tap-dancing around them either. Who else in public life has called for a
pre-emptive strike on North Korea?
Support Israel, our unsinkable Mideast aircraft carrier
The U.S. must continue to nurture and safeguard our special relationship
with the state of Israel. This relationship must remain the cornerstone
of our policy tactics through the entire Middle-East region,
as it has been for administrations of both parties for more than half a
century.Why do we have this special relationship? It is not out of
charity, guilt, or what some call “ethnic lobbies.”
We have been there for Israel because Israel is there for us. Israel is a
stable democracy in a region filled with dictatorship. As Israel has matured, our close ties also bring America a fair trading partner and a fellow pioneer on the high-tech frontier of medicine and communications that will enrich Americans’ lives in the coming century. Our two countries must continue to stand strong together as pillars of freedom and progress.
No comments :
Post a Comment