After giving House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) the greenlight to draft articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi melted down in front of reporters at her own press conference.
Beyond her usual talking points of "saving Democracy," and "adhering to the Constitution," the Speaker used her Catholic faith to skirt a simple question from Sinclair Broadcast Group reporter James Rosen. Rosen asked Speaker Pelosi very plainly if she hated the president whom she is in the process of impeaching in the House of Representatives. Rather than give a calm, respectful response, as an alleged ally of the free press would, Speaker Pelosi snapped at Rosen and invoked her Catholic faith as a shield, claiming to be offended.
JAMES ROSEN: Do you hate the president, Madam Speaker?
NANCY PELOSI: I don’t hate anybody. … And as a Catholic, I resent your using the word “hate" in a sentence that addresses me. … I pray for the president all the time. So don’t mess with me when it comes to words like that. pic.twitter.com/KgDHTlNRvo
— JM Rieger (@RiegerReport) December 5, 2019
Speaker Pelosi’s attempt at claiming the moral high ground here is the peak of hypocrisy from a career politician. Our individual faith and beliefs are our own forces to reckon with, but Speaker Pelosi is far from a shining example of a strict follower of the church’s teachings, especially given her spineless rhetoric on abortion as the issue moves to the center of the ideological divide.
As her party moves further to the left each day, especially on the issue of abortion, Speaker Pelosi has simultaneously remained silent while still claiming to be a moderate and a faithful Catholic. The mainstream Democratic Party, fueled by young progressives and far-left interest groups, has embraced unlimited, late-term abortion with open arms. The Speaker refuses to condemn the abhorrent abortion laws implemented in New York and Virginia, which both go even further than third trimester abortions. She also turns a blind eye to the harmful rhetoric pushed by groups such as Planned Parenthood and NARAL, both of which provide substantial monetary donations to the Democratic Party, as they encourage American women to "shout their abortions."
These radical views on abortion would nearly force former President Bill Clinton to side with the GOP on the issue. The 42nd president famously championed the “safe, legal and rare,” abortion stance, but the aforementioned ideology is now viewed as a stigma against women by young liberals. Mainstream progressives, the group dominating the agenda of the Democratic Party for the sake of votes, have shifted the narrative surrounding abortion from a solemn, difficult choice to a normal, routine healthcare procedure. This rhetoric is not only setting a dangerous precedent, but is also out of touch with reality.
The two traditional sides of the movement can disagree on when life begins and what trimester to cap legal abortion at, but the opposing sides have historically agreed that this choice is a solemn one for women. The Democratic Party stepping away from that historical agreement should sound the alarm for American voters.
This shift also gives Speaker Pelosi, a respected and talented legislator, a unique opportunity to be a leader within her party. However, instead of dispelling the notion that the views of the Democratic Party do not align with the far-left’s radical views on abortion, Speaker Pelosi turns a blind eye and cashes the campaign checks from far-left interest groups.
This is the Speaker’s burden to bear, but to invoke her Catholic faith in front of the American people in order to avoid admitting her obvious hatred for President Trump is despicable. If Madam Speaker wants to hate the duly elected president of the United States, she can. If she wants to embrace the radical abortion views of the growing, progressive wing of her party, that, too, is her choice. However, to use her Catholic faith as an excuse to claim immunity from talking about either of these issues, which her once-reasonable party has taken extreme stances on, goes against the very teachings on which she claims moral high ground.
Sunday, December 01, 2019
Wednesday, November 27, 2019
Job History of the 2000s- 2010s
Desktop Support Technician – University of Wisconsin, River Falls Computer Campus, River Falls, WI 01/2003-06/2003
- VHS to Quicktime to iMovie on Mac OS 10.2. tutorial.
- Sample DVD from camcorder footage of the University
- Dreamweaver 4.0 webpage help for students and build a webpage
- MPEG4 AVC DVD paper
- Store maintenance and janitorial work. Restock shelves and convenience machines.
Warehouse
and Product Stocker – Circuit City, Woodbury, MN 10/2006-04/2007
I
got a hold of the Vice President of Circuit City and got a job in
woodbury. Stock
items (Bluray, DVDs, CDs, computer hardware, batteries), empty totes,
organizing, filling totes in warehouse for a while. They
had a WoW guild made up of employees playing World of Warcraft at
home. I wasn’t able to add employees to Facebook back then.
Data
Entry Technician – PC Network Services, Stillwater,
MN 05/2007-03/2008
I
was a data entry technician in 2008 at PC Network Services. The CEO
was Peter. Peter was an immigrant from Eastern Europe. He liked
Soccer. His business closed in the great recession. He hired a
company called Genius concultants for his CentOS server. I was
reading off the Internet and did it wrong. He didn’t want Fedora
Linux or Ubuntu linux to run a LAMP. Installed CentOS 5.0
(functioned well) Installed LAMP web server along with installation
Added
categories and products to osCommerce eCommerce website which was
online for the remainder until they wen out of business due to CEO
decisions in 2008.
Pulatech
After
I completed Rasmussen College in March 2015, I knew I wanted to be in
Information Technology. In Hudson, I interviewed at Star Tech,
Pulatech and had an
internship.
In Baldwin, I interviewed at Western Wisconsin Health and had a
internship. Tiffany
Upp at Star Tech interviewed me.
Pulatech
didn’t keep me employed after 3 months. At Pulatech, it was
because a Chinese national went back home with data from Pulatech. I
think it was stolen data. Pulatech has Indian developers in India.
Pulatech moved to River Falls. Anyhow, Pulatech was owned by Geoffrey
Lee, CEO, and he had a Batchlors degree in Economics. Geoffrey helped
people through his church and volenteered my internship. Geoffrey
liked to say the F bomb through snapchat video. He had two sons
working there. One son ended up working at Best Buy Richfield for
website programming. The other son is in the US airforce . Geoffrey
liked the Minnesota Vikings.
For
job duties,
I installed install
Ubuntu Server 14.10.3 Apache, SAMBA server, OpenSSH Server. Then
I created
Ubuntu administrator accounts, redesign file for Gateway, Domain
controller IP Addresses in Ubuntu. Third,
I format
and Install Windows 10 Enterprise. Fourth,
I Format
and Install Windows Server 2012 R2. Fifth,
I login
Ubuntu with Putty Sixth,
I Login
onto an old WatchGuard firewall through Firefox and print out profile
settings for its replacement. Seventh,
I had
set the group
policy drive letter for Netgear ReadyNAS. Eighth,
I research
how to do local active directory on Amazon web services. Ninth,
I fixed
and explain Epson workforce printer issues. Tenth,
I vacuumed
eDell
Poweredge 2950 and aircan dust pc motherboards.
Eleventh,
I build
cubical wall for workspaces. Twelth,
I drill
table into studs onto cubical walls . Thirteenth,
I obtain
files from password protected workstation from Kali
Linux
LiveDVD.
Fourteenth,
I type
up an email tutorial for Windows, Android and iPad.
Fifteenth, I used SugarCRM
Community edition ( customer relationship management (CRM) system).
Geoffrey
Lee
gave me tough love for
not placing the printer in the right part
of the room.
I
had to move dividers for the tables from another room into the
workplace.
Express
Employment Services:
Then
I went to Express Employment in New Richmond. I took at SAT test,
and didn’t do well enough. They had a lot of factory jobs in St.
Croix County or truck unloading temporay jobs at $13 hr. They said
sometimes they do Information Technology.
Western
Wisconsin Health
After
4 months, I was hired at Baldwin Area Medical Center for my second
internship. I was a desktop
support technician. I
had to checking
new Hewlett-Packard inkjet printers via unpacking, print test page
from Windows Server 2012 R2 (DHCP IP addresses) running in remote
desktop, repacking them, and adding 'ok' label . Printers are sent to
the new Baldwin hospital. Two out of the 50 printers did not work
properly. Then
I had to check
pc source labeling in a registry book and then adding the destination
to the source label with a sharpie. Checking them off in the register
book. These PCs are sent to the room location in the new Baldwin
hospital via a vendor. Third,
I was adding
printer ip address to Windows Server 2012 R2 and then typing name
into printer settings. Forth,
I was labeling
RJ-45 cable boxes 1,3,6,10 for 1,3,6,10 feet cable. Fifth,
I was adding
network hp printers to Windows 7, add printer as a local printer, and
check off on list on a paper. Delete the unneeded network printer
from printer and devices in Windows 7. Shut down printers and store
printers back in a box. Write and search out pcs to add destination
sticker onto the pcs such as Tinys, laptops and towers located
throughout old hospital. Add network printers and add again as local
printers in old hospital rooms.
Write labels for all the handheld scanners in the old hospital and then search out and place the label onto the scanners.
Write labels for all the handheld scanners in the old hospital and then search out and place the label onto the scanners.
Write
labels for the most of the monitors than placed onto the monitors
throughout the old hospital.
Alphabetize
tiny pcs in boxes, because they were unsorted in the old hospital.
Used Microsoft
Excel
2010 to create a xlsx map chart containing PCs, printer and access
point destinations in new hospital. I unpacked printers onto shelves
in the new hospital. Unpacked LED monitors, tiny pcs, keyboards,
clamps and made a neat workstation space. Then
I used
Putty and Telnet in a remote desktop session to access a Cisco switch
to change ports for the VLAN in the new Baldwin hospital. Only one
computer could access the Cisco catalyst 2960 switch and had to use
remote desktop (old hospital pc).Write
labels for the most of the monitors, pcs, scanners. I
was kinda confused when I added tags to monitors and screens around
the hospital.
My
Three Best Buy Interviews
I
bombed three Best Buy interviews at Oakdale. They were playing Daft
Punk over the speaker. Discovery album during my first one and
Random Access Memories during my last job. One job was for A+
technician. Other jobs were CSR. My time at Circuit City didn’t
help me land the job. I think he told me I should work at a Best Buy
warehouse first and then inter to CSR afterwards ultimately became my
job at Laptop Chips in Roberts. I gave him my Youtube on the
resume. I had my instagram and my college transcripts. I passed the
CSR test three times.
WalMart
CSR Tests
I
passed Walmart CSR test twice in my life. Its kinda easy after you
find out you do Absolutely Sure or Absolutely Not on all the answers
with no Maybes Yes or Maybe No on multiple choice. I been the
Walmart 100 times. I know their store is disorganized and they have
rotating Management rotates. The only way to go to another Walmart
is if you want to be in Management. After holiday and Circuit City,
I ultimately decided Information Technology and no CSR.
Turnkey
and Three Square Market interview.
This
job was in River Falls, Wisconsin. I had a interview for phone
customer service with Cindy Remington to sell money to vending
machines in prisons. Three Square Market in
River Falls
was in the news for microchipping
people in their arm for life like chipping
dogs.
The unconstitutionality debate of chipping people like in Minority
Report (2002 movie) got on Hannity on Fox News Channel. There
was also a Network Administration job there that I filled out the
application six times for. I only had phone interviews.
Computer
Concierge interview
Computer
Concierge was in downtown Hudson. I had an interview with Padraic
Morton for a A+ technician in Hudson, Wisconsin. Padraic was gay.
Padraic needed help with computer repair. I also tried to get into
Digital Garage in Hudson for a interview. We met at a Starbucks for
the interview. No luck. He found someone bettter, but Computer
Concierge went bankrupt in 2018. The
company was small. They had a business to repair Ipad and iphone
screens.
Laptop
Chips.
From
August 2017 to February 2019 I was at Laptop Chips.
Search
database printer using a Virtual private network of Best
Buy.
Unpack printers and configuring new Gateway, IP Address, Netmask, and
host name on the printer. The label printed from the Laptop Chips
database. Placing labels from database onto the printers. Repacking
Lexmark printers in boxes and placed in new stack.
Scanning Cisco switch + switch module and Cisco gateway serial numbers in Laptop Chips database and sorting them into boxes or stacks .
Testing used Lenovo monitors' LCD screens using Microsoft Paint, printing a shipping label from the Laptop Chips database, repacking monitors into boxes with bubble rap plus foam, and taping box up to be sent back to the Fortune 100 company.
Print out labels from Laptop Chips Internet database for monitors and printer.
Rap units of 8 motherboards into bubble rap and package three units in a cardboard box
Clean cash registers and bubble rap them in cardboard box
Using the google server bios, deactivating file system encryption, getting into raid configuration to reformat 8 hard drives in the raid 0.
Using air compressor to spray debris from a used keyboard so back to brand new. Also tested keyboards and cleaned them.
Deleting Cisco IOS, NVRAM, and other files off used switches and routers through Putty and the IOS terminal.
Clean up and print test page for used Zebra LP-2844Z using Microsoft Word
some pallet jack and dolly experience moving boxes on pallets
recycling gaylord cardboard.
In admin mode in laptop chips database, changing label data
Organizing mice, different types of cables, power supplies to be recycled
Organize 1000s of "pricer" price tags into boxes.
replace batteries for 100s of bar code scanners.
Dismantled the RAM, battery, heat sinks, CPU,; motherboard from several HP Proliant BL460 & Cisco UCS-B250 & HP Proliant DL380 servers ; reassembled the case.
printed label & stacked IBM receipt printers in gaylord
sort end-of-life Cisco AIR-CAP3602I-A-K9 in gaylords
printed label and stacked IBM receipt printers recycling gaylord cardboard.
Scanning Cisco switch + switch module and Cisco gateway serial numbers in Laptop Chips database and sorting them into boxes or stacks .
Testing used Lenovo monitors' LCD screens using Microsoft Paint, printing a shipping label from the Laptop Chips database, repacking monitors into boxes with bubble rap plus foam, and taping box up to be sent back to the Fortune 100 company.
Print out labels from Laptop Chips Internet database for monitors and printer.
Rap units of 8 motherboards into bubble rap and package three units in a cardboard box
Clean cash registers and bubble rap them in cardboard box
Using the google server bios, deactivating file system encryption, getting into raid configuration to reformat 8 hard drives in the raid 0.
Using air compressor to spray debris from a used keyboard so back to brand new. Also tested keyboards and cleaned them.
Deleting Cisco IOS, NVRAM, and other files off used switches and routers through Putty and the IOS terminal.
Clean up and print test page for used Zebra LP-2844Z using Microsoft Word
some pallet jack and dolly experience moving boxes on pallets
recycling gaylord cardboard.
In admin mode in laptop chips database, changing label data
Organizing mice, different types of cables, power supplies to be recycled
Organize 1000s of "pricer" price tags into boxes.
replace batteries for 100s of bar code scanners.
Dismantled the RAM, battery, heat sinks, CPU,; motherboard from several HP Proliant BL460 & Cisco UCS-B250 & HP Proliant DL380 servers ; reassembled the case.
printed label & stacked IBM receipt printers in gaylord
sort end-of-life Cisco AIR-CAP3602I-A-K9 in gaylords
printed label and stacked IBM receipt printers recycling gaylord cardboard.
In
admin mode in laptop chips database, changing label data
Organizing
mice, different types of cables, power supplies, keyboards, mice to
be recycled
wrapping
computer hardware on pallet with plastic wrap
adding
stickers to boxes and moving pallets with a pallet jack from one side
of the warehouse to the other.
Get
rented out warehouse ready for its last day of rent. Lease on
warehouse ended. New warehouse in Baldwin, Wisconsin somewhere.
Dave
K. was nice. He hunted deer. He had a ATV. He was at Century
college for 1 year. Dave prefered no music. He was running a
project by Best Buy Aaron Foryste played death metal, and heavy
metal in the 2nd
warehouse. Aaron
went to the last rock concert in Somerset, Northern Invasion, to tape
Tool. Aaron had an associate degree from WITC New Richmond. He was
listening to Death (Death Metal) Metallica, Silpknot, Mastadon, Stone
Temple Pilots, System of a Down, Korn, Amon Amarth, Death, Opeth, . There was also some gangster
rap and death metal channels off Spotify. I got to play my own music
of Pandora. They also played Pandora and Tidal stations over the
speaker. The
employees were sometimes acting like children. The warehouse had
boxes, computer hardware, pellot loader, and forklifts. Four of them
were forklift qualified. Dave K. was 32. Josh was 34. Josh liked
Heavy Metal too. In Roberts, there is nothing good going on. The McDonalds by the Flying J truck stop and the park and ride is a place for drug dealers and shady stuff. The warehouse was cold in the winter. There was no heating. Everybody was on Facebook and Instagram and I added them.
Best
Buy Richfield downsized because of the retail apocalypse and I was
laid off at 1 year 7 months from working there.
It
feels I was let go from age discrimination
that starts at 35 years old. I was replaced by David Speath, who was a ASVAB in the marines. He had nepotism with Eric S (CEO). Eric Hillstead and David Speath appeared on Epic Economist youtube channel. David looks sad with tears against a white background. Eric Hillstead was in a monkey suit in a server farm in the videos.
Interview
with Fechel Shades with Todd Lochr in New Richmond, WI.
Todd
wanted a graphic designer and he did Information Technology. His
business was a Lamp Shade business in New Richmond. He wanted me to
photograph lap shades and delete the background in Adobe Photoshop. I
said I could do that with the Magic Lasso, but he wanted layers. He
didn’t think I knew how to use Photoshop. I said I used Paintshop
Pro for signatures for videogame message board forums.
2020
Moving
to Mankato, Minnesota
Sunday, November 24, 2019
What Impeachment Exposed About Trump and 2020
For those who got stuck watching the past two weeks of testimony in the circus inquiry into impeaching President Trump there is a bit of news that has been uncovered.
Let face it only about 3 percent of the American people spent time watching the proceedings. Compare that to the near 30 percent of the American people who tuned in to view the Clinton impeachment proceedings and you already understand something very important.
After watching the Democrats attempt to displace a lawfully elected president via fake charges of collusion with Russia, the voter doesn’t seem very impressed with an effort to displace him over a phony charge of “quid pro quo.”
Denying due process, witnesses, or even their choice of the committee members who would be allowed to speak just added to the (****yawn****) sham and why people felt no compulsion to view the goings on.
Now that it appears Democrats have called their final witnesses and they are preparing to recommend the formal articles of impeachment, it’s my belief that the president’s team will finally be allowed to punch back for the first time.
But before they do we need to point out a significant and vital truth.
Post intel-committee polls are pointing out this truth. But it deserves a wider recognition.
It would be wise for Pelosi and Schiff to consider it prior to taking even another step forward.
Democrats cast President Trump as someone who is so self-driven that he’s attempting to subvert justice just to “win an election.” That his thirst for victory pulsates through his heart so obsessively that he would break laws to have foreign governments interfere in our process just so that he could beat a Democrat.
Yet here’s the unspoken truth: He doesn’t need to.
He never has.
In 2016 he literally spent the least in campaign operations to win an impressive 30 state (plus) victory.
He spent less than his GOP opponents in the primary.
He is spending way less than any of the Democratic candidates at present, with hundreds of millions in cash on hand, ready to go to work when the time is right. But the truth is he’s had hundreds of millions in the bank since his victory in 2016.
The Democrats didn’t lose because the Russians spent $90,000 on Facebook ads. Team Hillary spent upwards of $69 million.
They lost because her message didn’t connect with voters who felt like Washington, D.C. was ignoring them.
In 2016 candidate Trump had no track record, but he had ideas, and he made promises. In 2020 he’s kept 87 of those promises, and he still has ideas not yet implemented.
In 2020 he will likely spend less money on media than his opponent. He will focus resources into going to meet voters at his enormous rallies. People will feel heard, they will look at his track record now, and will easily send him back to finish the fight.
He doesn’t need Russian bot-farms. He doesn’t need Ukrainian investigations. He doesn’t need a thing.
And it seems voters understand this.
Multiple polls showed movement with independents since the “public” impeachment inquiry had begun. Different polls showed differing amounts but the range was 8-11 percent in the president’s favor.
The media—which is the public relations arm of the Democrats—has helped spread the idea that if President Trump has done something illegal, that it should be looked into.
Voters gave the Democrats the chance to make their case. And just like with Russia, collusion, and Mueller, the wheels fell off the cart under scrutiny.
Donald Trump will win more states in 2020 than he won in 2016. (I’m on record saying 34-38. He won 30 in 2016). And he doesn’t need any help from anybody, minus the voters that he has worked tirelessly for while in office.
Believing otherwise is just playing the sucker the impeachment Dems tried to convince you that you were these past two weeks.
Don’t let them
Saturday, November 23, 2019
My auto-biography 1.0
I was born in 1984. I was in Redeemer Lutheran
Church (ELCA) in the early 1990s. The first pastor was welcoming.
The woman pastor wasn’t as welcoming. David and I used to come
over. David and I used to go to circuses, Science Museum of
Minnesota, play NES, SNES, N64, Genesis, Dreamcast and a little bit
of Gamecube. At David’s house in Somerset, we used to hear Ozzfest
and a train whistle. Ozzfest was playing nu metal like Slipknot,
Korn, Ozzy Osbourne, System of the Down in the 1990s. I noticed at
David’s room was messy so I cleaned it up. He had NES
games like Star Tropics, Super Mario Bros., Super Mario Bros. 2,
Super Mario Bros. 3, Spyhunter, Contra, and Mega Man II. He had
Genesis games like Sonic the Hedgehog, Sonic 2, Sonic 3, Sonic and
knuckles, and the Simpsons. He had Super Mario World and Super Mario
Kart. I used to meet him at Thanksgiving and Christmases. He got
the cool toys. I was stuck with no videogames like Teenage Mutant
Ninja Turtles action figures until 1997 when I got a N64. I had a PC
since 1993. It was MS-DOS and I played Simcity 2000, Hoyles Casino,
King’s Quest III. I got a Windows 95 pc in 1995. I made my first
website with Netscape Composer and upload it to pressenter.com with
FTP Voyager. I was surfing IGN.com, Gamespy.com,
Gamespot.com and Gamefaqs.com in the 1990s. I had 20 Disney VHS
tapes of animated cartoons. I made a Geocities
(geocities.com/nightwalkers101) website with Namo Webeditor 5. I
biked to Willow River State Park and around the trails in my
childhood, about 13 miles away from Roberts, Wisconsin to Hudson
Wisconsin and back.
At
Calvin Academy in Roseville and Moundsview. I was happy to be there.
I met city kids. I was happy about the one on one education. I had
Cs and Ds grades in the St. Croix Central public school. I was at
gym. I got many As and Bs at this school. It did have a clinic. I
was into country music in grade school. I had speech therapy in
grade school. I was happy go lucky. I was in cub scouts. I was
afraid of the polls on the recess equipment. One time I returned
there with my cousin, David, to use radio controlled cars. David had
nitro gas RC car. One time I was with some basketball players and a
swarm of wasps was there. I got measles there. I have a regret of
only having a disposable camera with me at field trips. St Croix
Central elementary had field trips to Minnesota Zoo, Como Zoo,
Science Museum of Minnesota, Mall of America. There was a social
studies class in SCC elementary. I used to play with LEGOs and build
airplanes. I used to have pillow fort downstairs with the tv on
Nickelodeon or Cartoon Network, Disney Channel watching Hanna
Barbara, Looney Tunes, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, Duck Tales, Chip
and Dale Rescue Rangers, Tail Spin, Batman The Animated Series, X-Men
Animated Series.
I
was in Cub scouts and Boy Scouts. I went to all the ranks up to Life
Scout. This was right before boy Scouts were into Jürgen Habermas and
invited girls. I went to Tomahawk every year. Sometimes I went to
Avanti Camp. It was a nice group of kids. I stayed friends with
Randy Peterson and Robert Haggerty for a while. Robert Haggerty
moved to Minnesota in 2008. Randy Peterson was in his house until
2008. Then he moved to New Richmond in 2008. My Redeemer Lutheran
confirmation (ELCA) had a woman reverend Marilyn, who wasn’t so
welcoming. My parents did dinners there. I was there for 8 years.
The church has a Jürgen Habermas Critical Theory book. I got to go
to Disney World (Epcot, Magic Kingdom) in 1997. The Great Movie
Ride. and Caribbean cruise by Royal Caribbean. I went to Cayman
Island, Florida Keys, Cozumel, Mexico, and Dunn River Falls,
Jamaica. I went on a Submarine on Cayman Island.
I
was at Renaissance Academy in River Falls in 2001-2003. This was
because Calvin Academy was costly. I met this friend Chuck Peskar. I
had a Red Hat Linux 7.2 and Command Prompt class at Chippewa Valley
Technical Center in 2003. I had to walk to the Pizza Hut (defunct
2019) and Subway. In the late 2000s I used to go to Bos and Mine and
Juniors in River Falls for bar hopping. That time I made it home from
Juniors almost totally drunk. When I met Chuck Peskar in 2019, he
said he lived in Minneapolis mixed up with the local mafia when it
was a sanctuary city of minorities.
I
worked with the Holiday Gas Station in Roberts. I had a high school
classmate Heidi Green. Circuit City from Woodbury in 2006-2007. I
worked both floor CSR and warehouse. PC network Services in
2007-2008. I did oscommence on Centos 5.0 in 2007.
In
2004, I took a network administration associate degree with WITC New
Richmond that I didn’t complete. I was using Knoppix in the Linux+
class. I took the CCNA test at the Cisco Academy class. I had
English class, an algebra class, a Visual Basic class, and industrial
networking class. I didn’t complete the associate degree. My GPA
was 2.5.
At
Rasmussen College Lake Elmo, I couldn’t take pictures or video. I
was there from 2007 to 2015. I took Network Administration, Network
Security, Health information technology (coding) and Project
Management MIS Bachelors. I met Brian Sager there who later became a
Facebook friend. There is only two pictures of me at college, one
with class and one with the dean.
I
went to Pierce County Fair a lot. I looked at the pictures, farm
animals, photography awards, amusement rides for 30 years. I used to
go with my cousin David Hartmon and my mom. I was around David 8
times a year.
At
Pulatech in Hudson Wisconsin. I was with a job coach during my
internship. I was normally into Ubuntu Server 14.04 creating
administrator passwords. Gregory just gave me a little tough love when I
put a printer in the wrong spot.
At
Baldwin Area Medical Center, I found on indeed.com for an internship.
I passed the interview. worked with Windows 7, Windows Server 2012
R2, and Cisco Catalyst switches. I changed Virtual LANs in Cisco IOS
thru telnet, putty, and terminal. The Management information systems
manager needed extra help with a skeleton information technology
staff. The new hospital networks went down because of the under
budget. They needed to redo it entirely and I wasn’t hired for a
permanent full time position. The network configuration was wrong.
The hospital was called Western Wisconsin Health too.
At
Laptop Chips, I worked for 1 year 7 months. I made friends, but they
weren’t able to get me another job. They just worked there,
because they couldn’t find any other job. Employees listened to
death metal, heavy metal, nu metal over the speaker from Pandora,
Spotify. Dave K. did not want a lot of music. Dave Keefer listened
to Pink Floyd a lot and had the Animals album for usernames at Laptop
Chips. Aaron and Eric had an Associate Degree with Network+. Aaron
also had Security+. The management has been to Century College for
1-2 years. The 18-19 year old employees were into old school rap
music. It was in the middle of the retail apocalypse and it was a
Best Buy warehouse. Best Buy Richfield finally ran out of contracts
for me to do before I was laid off. Some employees got to go to
Northern Invasion in Somerset, Wisconsin. That last year that they
held Northern Invasion due to illegal drugs and brawls. Aaron was
listening to Tool, Slipknot, Metallica, Three Days Grace, System of
the Down. Aaron was like Robert Haggerty in 2001.
Monday, November 18, 2019
Civil War Begins When the Constitutional Order Breaks Down
Georgetown Institute
poll finds that two-thirds of us believe we are edging closer “to the
brink of a civil war.” Yet Americans cannot properly analyze this “gathering storm.” We lack a framework, a lexicon, and the historical data (from other civil wars) to see clearly what is happening to us.
Here is a quick template for how we might more usefully decipher how this nation gets to another civil war. It is arranged as a short series of questions: 1) What is civil war? 2) Why do political-constitutional orders sometimes breakdown, rather than simply transform in response to change? 3) How is violence essential to constitutional and political resolution? 4) How close is the U.S. to such a break down, and its consequences?
What is civil war?
Civil war is, at root, a contest over legitimacy. Legitimacy—literally the right to make law — is shorthand for the consent of the citizens and political parties to abide by the authority of a constitutional order. Civil war begins when this larger political compact breaks down.
Civil
War means that there is a functional split within the source of
legitimacy between two parties, each of which was formerly part of the
old constitutional order. Thus each can claim that it represents the
source of new legitimacy, and the right to define a new or reworked
constitutional order.
Hence civil war becomes a struggle in which one party must successfully assert a successor legitimate order, and to which the opposing party must eventually submit. This is above all a contest over constitutional authority. Inasmuch as civil war happens after constitutional breakdown, it means that resolution must be reached not only outside of a now-former legal framework, but also unrestrained even by longstanding political customs and norms. Extra-constitutional force is now the deciding factor, which is why these struggles are called civil wars.
Americans
are most familiar with our own such battles, from 1775-1783 and
1861-1876. For example, Parliament’s “Intolerable Acts” (1774) stripped
Massachusetts of its governing legitimacy, leading to armed resistance to Parliament’s authority. Two “legitimacies” at war.
In 1860, the election of Abraham Lincoln convinced Southern electorates that the incoming Republican administration would strip them of their way of life. The slave states could only accept a constitutional order that fully supported slavery. The only legitimacy lay in Slavocracy—while the North, for its part, would not, as Lincoln declared, accept “the nationalization of slavery.”
Why do some constitutional orders breakdown rather than transform?
Our political stability has depended on the tenure of periodic “party systems.” Legitimacy flows from the give and take of a two-party relationship. American party systems have had dominant parties or states. In the first party system, four of the first five presidents (32 out of 36 years) were slaveholders from Virginia. The second party system was more balanced between Democrats and Whigs, but broke down in the 1850s when the Whigs up and vanished, with party stability disappearing with them. The new GOP dominated the third system, 6-2, with one of the Democrats impeached. Equally, the fourth was also Republican, 6-1, with a Republican third party challenge electing the only Dem. FDR’s fifth party system put Democrats in office for 32 out of 48 years, with both GOP administrations governing within a New Deal worldview.
Many thought that Reagan’s electoral wave signaled a sixth party system, yet it failed to take root. After 1992, the parties have alternated presidents every eight years, and with each succeeding administration, the political milieu has grown yet more rancorous and divided. There is no relationship between parties now — save as sworn enemies — let alone a “system.”
The situation resonates with the 1850s. When collegial understandings between “The Democracy” and the Whigs evaporated, a new opposing party appeared suddenly, and as an enemy. No other relationship was possible.
Hence, a party system ending without a consensual replacement means that longstanding customs and norms that undergird constitutional relationships are quietly pared away. In other words, well before legal confrontations over legitimacy, the erosion of informal rules sets up adjudicating crises over formal rules. This was a feature of the final deterioration in Congress before 1860, marked by brawls on the floor of the House and a bloody assault in the Senate.
Dismantling a web of political relationships precedes the dismantling of constitutional legitimacy.
How is violence essential to constitutional and political resolution?
Violence is the magical substance of civil war. If, by definition, political groups in opposition have also abandoned the legitimacy of the old order, then a successor constitutional order with working politics cannot be birthed without violence. Hence violence is the only force that can bring about a new order. This is why all memorable civil wars, and all parties, enthusiastically embrace violence.
The character of civil war is existential. The breakdown of the old order forces frightening prospects on society. If constitutions represented a collective source of authority, in its violent replacement are suddenly two opposing and inimical pretenders, each crying for both allegiance and punishment. Moreover, one party’s victory is the inevitable loss of the other’s way of life.
Hence in such conflicts, the entire society must choose sides, and it is an all-or-nothing choice. Moderates and undecided, and those peaceful fence sitters all are forced to join warring factions. In civil war, perhaps the greatest violence, in the heart, is the aggressive coercion to join a warring cause.
War becomes a great, mutual ritual of resolution between enemies-once-brothers. Here, longstanding customs and norms, paradoxically, come right into play. While old political norms may have been discarded, old conflict norms again take center stage. If there is to be a war, certain expectations, even hallowed traditions come into play: How battle should be formed, and also too, the pathways battle resolves.
Hence, the “Cousins’ War” of 1775-1781 quite clearly took its battlefield cues from the English Civil War (1642-1651), and followed the rituals, not only of formal battles, but also the norms and standards for victory and defeat. Likewise, the Confederacy, three generations later, explicitly declared itself a glorious cause cut from the same cloth as the declaration of 1776.
Our antique civil wars were not bound to formal rules, yet somehow they held to well-etched bounds of expectation. American society today has very different norms and expectations for civil conflict, which certainly will constrain how we fight the next battle.
Today’s America no longer embraces a national landscape of an industrial-lockstep battlefield (think Gettysburg, D-Day). Our next civil war—as social media so eloquently reminds us—will enact its violence on a battle campus of equal pain, if less blood. Yet there will be much blood, however it will take form like the gatheringchaos of our world.
How close is the U.S. to such a breakdown—and its consequences?
American constitutional order has not broken down, yet. Constitutional legitimacy still rules. Recent tests of legitimacy confirm this. A presidential impeachment in the 1990s did not lead to conviction in a trial, nor did anyone expect it to. The Supreme Court decided a contested presidential election in 2000, and the decision was everywhere accepted. 2016, in contrast, was bitterly accepted. Yet even the relentless force to depose the president that followed, through a special prosecutor, was spent by the spring of 2019.
Yet if these are tests of robust legitimacy they are hardly reassuring. A daily torrent of unfiltered evidence suggests that our constitutional order is fissuring before our eyes. That we have skirted constitutional crisis for the past quarter century is no reassurance, but rather an alarm of continuing erosion. Each new test is yet more bitterly contested, and still less resolved.
Today, two irreconcilable visions of American life believe that they can continue only if they own the whole order. Yet ours has been a shared constitutional order. As we witnessed from 1860-1876, it must proceed as a consensual and joint party system: It cannot exist through single party ownership. The single-minded drive toward this goal—especially now by Blue state Democrats—has embrittled our constitutional order, and is creating the basis for a full-scale legitimacy crackup. Here’s what it might look like:
A contested election that Court decision fails to resolve. Supreme Court legitimacy has eroded in the years since Bush v. Gore. Today, a Court decision that is rejected by half the nation would not only effectively drain its authority, but also leave the U.S. no final arbiter in governance. Democrats’ courtpacking would certainly abet this.
Declaration of a pre- or post-election state of emergency. As Commander-in-Chief, the executive can temporarily assume extraordinary powers. We have witnessed such moments as recently as 9-11. What if the emergency had a domestic focus, such as a “coup d’état” within the government itself? What if it was the refusal of Congress to accept such an executive order, or even the continued tenure of the president?
State nullification of Federal policy, laws, or executive decisions.State nullification, indelibly tied to another civil war, casts a long shadow. States are selectively nullifying executive decisions and federal law, like Blue states with sanctuary cities and legal marijuana. What if beleaguered Red states defied Federal gun confiscation (second amendment) or exercise of religion (first amendment) laws/executive orders, by calling up state militia and mobilizingstate defense forces?
The issue here is not “What if?” but rather, “What then?” It is not about the authenticity of conflict scenarios, but rather about how contingencies we cannot now predict might bring us to a breaking point, andthe breakdown of legitimacy.
Already, warring sides have hardened their hearts so that they will do almost anything in order to prevail. The great irony is that their mutual drive to win—either to preserve their way of life, or make their way of life the law of the land—means that the battle has already become a perverse alliance. Today they refuse to work together in the rusting carapace of old constitutional order. Yet nonetheless they work shoulder-to-shoulder, together, to overthrow it. For both sides, the old order is the major obstacle to victory. Hence victory is through overthrow. Only when constitutional obstacles are toppled can the battle for light and truth begin.
Editor’s Note: The first paragraph was edited to reflect the exact wording of the Georgetown Institute poll.
Here is a quick template for how we might more usefully decipher how this nation gets to another civil war. It is arranged as a short series of questions: 1) What is civil war? 2) Why do political-constitutional orders sometimes breakdown, rather than simply transform in response to change? 3) How is violence essential to constitutional and political resolution? 4) How close is the U.S. to such a break down, and its consequences?
Civil war is, at root, a contest over legitimacy. Legitimacy—literally the right to make law — is shorthand for the consent of the citizens and political parties to abide by the authority of a constitutional order. Civil war begins when this larger political compact breaks down.
Hence civil war becomes a struggle in which one party must successfully assert a successor legitimate order, and to which the opposing party must eventually submit. This is above all a contest over constitutional authority. Inasmuch as civil war happens after constitutional breakdown, it means that resolution must be reached not only outside of a now-former legal framework, but also unrestrained even by longstanding political customs and norms. Extra-constitutional force is now the deciding factor, which is why these struggles are called civil wars.
In 1860, the election of Abraham Lincoln convinced Southern electorates that the incoming Republican administration would strip them of their way of life. The slave states could only accept a constitutional order that fully supported slavery. The only legitimacy lay in Slavocracy—while the North, for its part, would not, as Lincoln declared, accept “the nationalization of slavery.”
Why do some constitutional orders breakdown rather than transform?
Our political stability has depended on the tenure of periodic “party systems.” Legitimacy flows from the give and take of a two-party relationship. American party systems have had dominant parties or states. In the first party system, four of the first five presidents (32 out of 36 years) were slaveholders from Virginia. The second party system was more balanced between Democrats and Whigs, but broke down in the 1850s when the Whigs up and vanished, with party stability disappearing with them. The new GOP dominated the third system, 6-2, with one of the Democrats impeached. Equally, the fourth was also Republican, 6-1, with a Republican third party challenge electing the only Dem. FDR’s fifth party system put Democrats in office for 32 out of 48 years, with both GOP administrations governing within a New Deal worldview.
Many thought that Reagan’s electoral wave signaled a sixth party system, yet it failed to take root. After 1992, the parties have alternated presidents every eight years, and with each succeeding administration, the political milieu has grown yet more rancorous and divided. There is no relationship between parties now — save as sworn enemies — let alone a “system.”
The situation resonates with the 1850s. When collegial understandings between “The Democracy” and the Whigs evaporated, a new opposing party appeared suddenly, and as an enemy. No other relationship was possible.
Hence, a party system ending without a consensual replacement means that longstanding customs and norms that undergird constitutional relationships are quietly pared away. In other words, well before legal confrontations over legitimacy, the erosion of informal rules sets up adjudicating crises over formal rules. This was a feature of the final deterioration in Congress before 1860, marked by brawls on the floor of the House and a bloody assault in the Senate.
Dismantling a web of political relationships precedes the dismantling of constitutional legitimacy.
How is violence essential to constitutional and political resolution?
Violence is the magical substance of civil war. If, by definition, political groups in opposition have also abandoned the legitimacy of the old order, then a successor constitutional order with working politics cannot be birthed without violence. Hence violence is the only force that can bring about a new order. This is why all memorable civil wars, and all parties, enthusiastically embrace violence.
The character of civil war is existential. The breakdown of the old order forces frightening prospects on society. If constitutions represented a collective source of authority, in its violent replacement are suddenly two opposing and inimical pretenders, each crying for both allegiance and punishment. Moreover, one party’s victory is the inevitable loss of the other’s way of life.
Hence in such conflicts, the entire society must choose sides, and it is an all-or-nothing choice. Moderates and undecided, and those peaceful fence sitters all are forced to join warring factions. In civil war, perhaps the greatest violence, in the heart, is the aggressive coercion to join a warring cause.
War becomes a great, mutual ritual of resolution between enemies-once-brothers. Here, longstanding customs and norms, paradoxically, come right into play. While old political norms may have been discarded, old conflict norms again take center stage. If there is to be a war, certain expectations, even hallowed traditions come into play: How battle should be formed, and also too, the pathways battle resolves.
Hence, the “Cousins’ War” of 1775-1781 quite clearly took its battlefield cues from the English Civil War (1642-1651), and followed the rituals, not only of formal battles, but also the norms and standards for victory and defeat. Likewise, the Confederacy, three generations later, explicitly declared itself a glorious cause cut from the same cloth as the declaration of 1776.
Our antique civil wars were not bound to formal rules, yet somehow they held to well-etched bounds of expectation. American society today has very different norms and expectations for civil conflict, which certainly will constrain how we fight the next battle.
Today’s America no longer embraces a national landscape of an industrial-lockstep battlefield (think Gettysburg, D-Day). Our next civil war—as social media so eloquently reminds us—will enact its violence on a battle campus of equal pain, if less blood. Yet there will be much blood, however it will take form like the gatheringchaos of our world.
How close is the U.S. to such a breakdown—and its consequences?
American constitutional order has not broken down, yet. Constitutional legitimacy still rules. Recent tests of legitimacy confirm this. A presidential impeachment in the 1990s did not lead to conviction in a trial, nor did anyone expect it to. The Supreme Court decided a contested presidential election in 2000, and the decision was everywhere accepted. 2016, in contrast, was bitterly accepted. Yet even the relentless force to depose the president that followed, through a special prosecutor, was spent by the spring of 2019.
Yet if these are tests of robust legitimacy they are hardly reassuring. A daily torrent of unfiltered evidence suggests that our constitutional order is fissuring before our eyes. That we have skirted constitutional crisis for the past quarter century is no reassurance, but rather an alarm of continuing erosion. Each new test is yet more bitterly contested, and still less resolved.
Today, two irreconcilable visions of American life believe that they can continue only if they own the whole order. Yet ours has been a shared constitutional order. As we witnessed from 1860-1876, it must proceed as a consensual and joint party system: It cannot exist through single party ownership. The single-minded drive toward this goal—especially now by Blue state Democrats—has embrittled our constitutional order, and is creating the basis for a full-scale legitimacy crackup. Here’s what it might look like:
A contested election that Court decision fails to resolve. Supreme Court legitimacy has eroded in the years since Bush v. Gore. Today, a Court decision that is rejected by half the nation would not only effectively drain its authority, but also leave the U.S. no final arbiter in governance. Democrats’ courtpacking would certainly abet this.
Declaration of a pre- or post-election state of emergency. As Commander-in-Chief, the executive can temporarily assume extraordinary powers. We have witnessed such moments as recently as 9-11. What if the emergency had a domestic focus, such as a “coup d’état” within the government itself? What if it was the refusal of Congress to accept such an executive order, or even the continued tenure of the president?
State nullification of Federal policy, laws, or executive decisions.State nullification, indelibly tied to another civil war, casts a long shadow. States are selectively nullifying executive decisions and federal law, like Blue states with sanctuary cities and legal marijuana. What if beleaguered Red states defied Federal gun confiscation (second amendment) or exercise of religion (first amendment) laws/executive orders, by calling up state militia and mobilizingstate defense forces?
The issue here is not “What if?” but rather, “What then?” It is not about the authenticity of conflict scenarios, but rather about how contingencies we cannot now predict might bring us to a breaking point, andthe breakdown of legitimacy.
Already, warring sides have hardened their hearts so that they will do almost anything in order to prevail. The great irony is that their mutual drive to win—either to preserve their way of life, or make their way of life the law of the land—means that the battle has already become a perverse alliance. Today they refuse to work together in the rusting carapace of old constitutional order. Yet nonetheless they work shoulder-to-shoulder, together, to overthrow it. For both sides, the old order is the major obstacle to victory. Hence victory is through overthrow. Only when constitutional obstacles are toppled can the battle for light and truth begin.
Editor’s Note: The first paragraph was edited to reflect the exact wording of the Georgetown Institute poll.
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)