Will Biden Back to Trump Represent a Smooth Transition of Power? Not While Obama is Around

 

While mainstream reporters kept questioning whether or not President Trump would leave office willingly, he did so on schedule and as required. Will Biden do the same if Trump is re-elected? Don’t count on it while Barack Obama is around. 

Advertisement

While we’re at it, did the media question Obama’s behavior upon leaving office? In particular, did Obama offer a smooth transition for Trump to assume the presidency? A wave of evidence shows that he did not. Obama continually thwarted his successor, unlike every previous president in U.S. history. 

Constant Meddling

Obama’s post-presidency was unique among presidents. He never moved from Washington D.C. Upon leaving office, Obama set up headquarters a short drive from the White House. His compound included his family residence, an apartment for Valerie Jarrett, his former senior advisor, and offices for Jarrett and various staff people.

Organizing for Action, Obama’s umbrella organization was focused on steering public discourse and national events through the mobilization of thousands of volunteers, all to undermine Trump’s presidency.

At the time, veteran political writer Scott Powell notes, “Unbeknownst to most Americans, Barack Obama is the first ex-president in 228 years of U.S. history to structure and lead a political organization, a shadow government, for the explicit purpose of sabotaging his successor – duly elected President Donald Trump.”

Out of the Shadows]

Obama currently is pulling the strings that control his puppet, the demented Joe Biden. Years back, when Obama ran for state senator in 1995, his campaign kickoff was held at the home of William Ayers and his wife, Bernadine Dohrn. These two are self-avowed and unrepentant domestic terrorists. Mayhem is their track record. Freed on a technicality, Ayers wishes he had done more harm to America.

Obama trailed considerably when he ran for the U.S. Senate in 2004, months before the election. Aided by his fixer, David Axelrod, Obama was able to unseal court documents about his opponent’s nasty divorce years earlier. Once this highly private information went public via the Chicago Tribune, Obama’s opponent was doomed.

Always of questionable origin, Obama was all about public image. At the Trinity United Church of Christ on Chicago’s south side, he spent 20 years in the congregation of separatist-racist Reverend Jeremiah Wright. Then, as revelations about Wright were illuminated, Obama roundly disavowed him.

Obama’s subterfuge began before Trump’s inauguration. Obama unmasked names of Trump’s staff and associates, diffused top intelligence among numerous federal agencies, and coordinated timed intelligence leaks to the press, all designed to thwart the legitimacy and effectiveness of Trump’s presidency.

A Break with Tradition

Because he was desperate to cover his numerous impeachable acts, Obama acted quickly once his designated replacement, Hillary Clinton, lost the election. His first target was three-star general Mike Flynn, Trump’s incoming National Security Advisor. Flynn possessed the political knowledge to unravel Obama’s massive schemes quickly. 

Previous presidents felt that the safe and effective transfer of power was vital to the new president to govern unfettered. After their respective terms in office, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and James Monroe each returned to their homes along the eastern seaboard, some of which were financially underwater.

Breaking with tradition, John Quincy Adams eventually returned to Washington as a congressional representative, but not to thwart his successor, Andrew Jackson. Jackson and his successor, Martin Van Buren, also departed the Capitol after their respective terms in office.

Only Woodrow Wilson, of all previous presidents, remained in town, but as an invalid. He had zero capacity to govern or conspire either at the end of his presidency or for his remaining 18 months of life. Six decades later, President Carter, who launched the Carter Center, and President Clinton, who initiated the Clinton Global Initiative and the financially suspect Clinton Foundation, did not seek to undermine their successors.

Advertisement

Obstruction 101

Ever the “community organizer,” Obama’s home and adjoining offices were regarded as the “nerve center” of Trump administration resistance. From his command post, Obama and his staff organized groups and rallies, wrote articles and speeches, developed media programming, and continually disseminated information created to thwart the Trump presidency.

Obama’s overall activities, to this day, make him the most despicable president and former president that we’ve ever encountered. Will Obama ever be exposed even to the Left for his acts against our republic? The future is yet to unfold.

How to Ensure a Big, Ugly War With Iran

 

Iranian-backed militias have attacked American installations and forces in Syria, Iraq, and Jordan some 170 times.

Ostensibly, these terrorist groups claim they are hitting U.S. forces to coerce America into dropping its support of Israel and demanding a cease-fire in the Gaza war.

In reality, these satellite terrorists are being directed in a larger effort by Iran to pry the U.S. out of the Middle East, in the manner of the 1983 Marine barracks bombing.

That way, Iran will be free to fulfill its old dream of becoming a nuclear shield for a new Shiite/Persian terrorist axis from Tehran to Damascus to Beirut to the West Bank and Gaza–surrounding Israel and intimidating the Gulf regimes and more moderate states like Jordan and Egypt into concessions.

These Iranian appendages have made a number of unfortunately correct assumptions about America in general and the Biden administration in particular.

One, after the recent serial humiliations of the flight from Afghanistan, the passivity of watching a Chinese spy balloon traverse with impunity the continental United States, the mixed American signals on the eve of the Ukraine war, the troubled Pentagon’s recruitment and leadership lapses, and the destruction of the U.S. southern border, both Iran and its surrogates feel that the United States either cannot or will do much of anything in response to their aggression.

They see the U.S. military short thousands of recruits, its leadership politicized, its munition stocks depleted by arms shipments to Ukraine and Israel, and the massive abandonment of weapons in Kabul.

Two, they view Joe Biden’s serial appeasement as a force multiplier of these perceptions of American weakness. After entering office, the Biden administration begged for a renewed Iran deal from a preening theocracy. It sought to ensure calm by delisting the Houthis from global terrorist designations and sending hundreds of millions of dollars to Hamas and radical Palestinians to buy good behavior.

Biden may have agreed that Iran was the spider in the center of the Middle East Islamic terrorist web, but only thereby to win over it with bribes such as lifting embargoes and sanctions to ensure an Iranian windfall of $90 or more billion in oil sales revenue.

Biden green lighted a bribery payment of $6 billion to Iran to return American hostages, thereby ensuring more will be taken. It loudly distanced itself from the Netanyahu government. The gulf encouraged radicals to believe they could coerce Israel into accepting radical Islamic states on the West Bank and Gaza.

Three, after hitting American stations and bases 170 times and seeing little sustained, much less disproportionate, responses, Iran and its satellites now feel they are winning proxy wars with the U.S.

They have all but shut down the Red Sea as an international shipping route–damaging Europe, Egypt and Israel, which all depend on Red Sea commerce for vital imports and exports.

Iran has forced Biden to publicly alienate the Netanyahu government and push a ceasefire down Israel’s throat. And it has helped to spark international pro-Hamas protests throughout Europe and the US that timid and compliant left-wing governments fear could lose them close elections.

But most damaging are administration spokesmen who mouth the same empty script after each serial attack: 1) The US will respond at the time and place of its own choosing. 2) The US finds no direct evidence of Iranian involvement, although it clearly has supplied the attackers; 3) The US does not wish a wider war and has no plans to attack Iran itself.

Translated to our enemies, it means an 80-year-old non-compos-mentis president is in no position to prevent, much less win, a theater-wide Middle East war that his own serial appeasement has now nearly birthed.

Biden and the Democratic Party know, as National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan pointed out just prior to the Oct. 7 attacks on Israel, that the administration inherited a deterred and quiet Middle East. And then it blew up on their appeasing watch.

Now they are terrified of a theater-wide conflict breaking out during an election year–a fact known to all of America’s Middle East enemies.

Biden and company have forgotten the ancient wisdom that preparing loudly only for peace guarantees war. To prevent war, it should return to oil sanctions on Iran, embargo its banking transactions, slap a travel ban on Iran and its allies, cut off all aid to Hamas and the West Bank, and restore a true terrorist designation for the Houthis.

US officials must stop aimlessly babbling. If the administration must speak, Washington should do so by conveying disproportionality and unpredictability. And if, and when, America were to strike, it should do so in silent and devastating fashion.

When serially attacked, loudly responding that we will only proportionally strike back and wish no wider war will only ensure a big, ugly one.

Democrats Continually Win the Word Game, While Republicans Are Clueless

 

Democrats are masters of creating new terms and phrases that stick in the minds of the people they wish to influence. Republicans, by contrast, have little or no such capabilities.

Terms that Stick

The all-time stroke of Democrat wordplay genius happened several decades back. Everyone knew that Democrats, by and large, were for abortion and that Republicans, by and large, were not. The terminology for the two sides was pro-abortion and pro-life. Democrats came to realize that pro-abortion didn’t sound all that palatable.

Sure enough, when the dust settled, Democrats began calling their view pro-choice, with that new term effectively eliminating the use of pro-abortion forevermore while standing in juxtaposition to the term pro-life. This was a stroke of genius because pro-choice implies that a woman could choose whether or not to have a baby. It seemed quite egalitarian.

Republicans, by contrast, were pro-life. The meaning of that term equated to no other option besides carrying the baby to term. Since then, Democrats have slaughtered Republicans at every turn in terms of terminology.

Voter Suppression By Any Other Name

Consider the Inflation Reduction Act. A more accurate name would be the Inflation Enhancement Act or the Inflation Acceleration Act. Biden and company knew, however, that calling the Act what it actually leads to would never work.

How about the Voting Rights Act? The name sounds great, doesn’t it? Ergo, the Act wins the hearts and minds of millions of low-information voters. Such voters do not pay attention to anything more than the name itself. Hence they are easily misled. ‘Voting rights,’ that sounds good. Why would anyone want to be against that?”

What was the Republican response to the introduction of this intentionally misnamed piece of legislation? A big, fat nothing. Republicans could have immediately called it the “voter fraud establishment act.” That would have perked up some ears. They could have called it the “citizen disenfranchisement act.”

Alas, in their mysterious ways, Republicans, and Conservatives in general, don’t seem to have a clue as to why carefully chosen words, specific terminology, and keenly crafted phrases matter in politics. Over many, many years the Right has been blowing grand opportunities to participate in the catchy characterization contest. 

The Reverse Name Game

One has to wonder, how many under-informed voters end up pulling the tab for Democrats only because of terminology that sounds more appealing?

George Soros organizations, among the most leftist on Earth, play the name game expertly. Among the hundreds of organizations that Soros founded or otherwise supports, their names are ALWAYS the direct opposite of what they actually stand for.

His Open Society Foundations and Foundation to Promote Open Society are two multi-billion dollar far-left grant and advocacy foundations bent on restricting freedoms everywhere. His Institute for New Economic Thinking advocates unorthodox, radical, far-left economic policy positions. Review 100 or more Soros organizations and you see the reverse name game employed every single time.

Liberal no More

When the quintessential term liberal began to fall out of favor with legions of voters, Democrats/Leftists migrated to the more palatable-sounding progressive. Notice that Democrats didn’t move from liberal to socialist or Marxist, which would have been completely accurate. Marxist, they knew, carried highly toxic connotations. Socialists were not quite as onerous as Marxists, but still needed to be avoided.

Oddly enough, the few souls who are aware of the history of the American progressive movement know that progressive means socialist. Since most people are unaware of history, have never heard of Eugene Debs, and couldn’t give a hoot about any of it, Democrats felt reasonably safe using progressive. When “Democratic Socialist” Bernie Sanders ran for president in 2016, the term socialist re-emerged.

When low-information voters encounter the term progressive, the thought pattern is, “Why wouldn’t I want to be progressive? That’s a good thing, right?”

Once Democrats devise a catchy name that will stick, whether or not it has any basis in reality, they blast it all over creation, aided and abetted by the sycophantic mass media which covers for them 24/7.  

Like a Sledgehammer

With the winning terminology in place, Democrats pound it into all of their talking points. Then, in a short period of time, invariably these catchy characterizations become the everyday reality with which we all must deal.

To this day, pro-choice – which means pro-abortion – is the prevailing term for those who want to abort babies. Meanwhile, sadly, Republicans and Conservatives don’t merely lose the word game, they simply have no game.

Actually the One Calling the Shots On the Border

 

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) suggests that President Joe Biden is not the voice behind the nation’s ongoing border crisis. 

This week, Johnson cast his doubts that Biden is not the one calling the shots on the administration’s immigration policy, which is devastating the United States. 

“He knows that he has the authority. We’ve documented it for him,” Johnson said during an interview with Fox Business. “I’ve read to him the law myself — to the president. Read him the provisions of the law and said, ‘Mr. President, please take action.’ I don’t think he’s allowed to do it.”

Johnson suggested that the president’s staff is making the decision for him, adding that he thinks they are pushing him to keep the border open. 

The Speaker also said that Biden and Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas’ actions of dismantling the Trump Administration’s border policy on the first day of the 81-year-old is in office suggest the border crisis “is by design.”

“Biden went in on the first day of office and began issuing executive orders to … create this catastrophe. Maria, we say it’s ‘by design’ because there is no other explanation,” Johnson said. “We documented 64 executive actions, agency actions, that he and Mayorkas have taken to create this. They could unwind it today by the stroke of a pen.”

The U.S.-Mexico border has seen record amounts of illegal crossings. The fiscal year 2023 alone saw a massive number of illegal aliens storm the southern border, with a record of 3.2 million migrants encountered. This number does not include “gotaways” or those who have avoided detection. Since Biden took office, more than 8 million illegal aliens have entered the United States. 

Johnson and Biden have been neck and neck with one another as the president continues to ask Congress to pass a bipartisan bill addressing the country’s illegal immigration issue. At the same time, Republicans are demanding Biden to do more to stem the record-breaking flow of illegal aliens from entering the U.S. 

A border deal has been in the works for several weeks now. The Democrat-controlled Senate is working on a deal that would include additional aid for Ukraine and Israel, with border security reforms. However, Johnson has already said the deal would be “dead on arrival” in the GOP-led House.

Facebook is insane about unemployment and doomsday clock

 

So I tell everybody I’m unemployed, because of World War 3, military draft, nato invading Ukraine. and I lose 15 followers. I rightly explain it is linked to 90 seconds to midnight on the doomsday clock and I lose 15 followers and 5 friends. What the fuck people. I screenshot the website.

So basically they want nuclear war on facebook and me living under a bridge with little food as long as I lose followers, because they’re the biggest corrupted dipshits I’ve ever seen. 

Oh they’re worried about chaos they say with their 40-60 likes and 20 comments per post in their bubble. WTF people. There is something seriously wrong with facebook. I’m unemployed so its not all rainbows and unicorns!

Facebook go fuck yourself.