The Origins Of Queer Communism (use smith act on Democratic Party)

 So-called “pride” clothing for kids from a transgender designer who sells Satan-themed products? Where did all of this come from? Clearly, American corporations are transmission belts for Satanism and communism. But the communists exported Cultural Marxism to the United States.

Many conservatives do not understand this.

The author of Communism for Kids, Bini Adamczak, wrote that “the Russian revolution instilled new hope, particularly in women and people who did not identify themselves within the hetero-normative paradigm.” The “destruction of the family,” she writes, was the goal. “With the revolution, the right to legal abortion, both sexes’ right to divorce, the decriminalization of adultery, and the annulment of the sodomy law (which had previously prohibited homosexuality) were implemented and enforced,” she explains.

In other words, as one scholar noted, the tsarist legal codes were abrogated “in the name of socialist justice.”

“In Moscow, one could find international communes led by gay communists,” she says. “Drag kings could become legitimate members of the Red Army. Participants of the revolutionary debates decided upon the destruction of the family, demanded the legalization of incest, and advertised the practice [of] polygamy.”

However, in 1934, after Stalin had consolidated power, he returned to what the communists called “the remnants of the old regime,” a recognition that the sexual revolution was proceeding too fast and was too disruptive.

In the United States where “Queer Communism” was exported through the Frankfurt School, Harry Hay, a Communist Party USA member, founded the modern gay rights movement in the U.S.

The role of Russia is confusing to some, since Russia has moved into a different phase of communist revolution, having neglected the capitalist stage of development outlined by Karl Marx, and is now trying to reclaim certain tendencies that seem to be offensive to liberals in the West, such as nationalism and religion, in order to rally its dispirited and demoralized populace.

Striking a pro-family pose, the divorced Russian ruler, Vladimir Putin, bans gay propaganda in schools.

In the United States, the extreme forms of Cultural Marxism that are now expressing openly Satanic themes have emerged because of the “progressive” breakdown in the traditional family structure, referred to in stark terms as the abolition of the family in the Communist Manifesto.

This began decades ago in the easy divorce laws resulting from married couples committing adultery. Sadly, most people know friends, neighbors, and family members going through a divorce. Families were destroyed.

Mark Levin’s book American Marxism notes the explicit anti-family part of the Communist Manifesto without linking the Marxist campaign to many of the social and cultural problems, especially failing marriages, plaguing the United States, and creating fatherless families.

As I noted in my column, “The American Marxist Revolution,” to put it bluntly, most Americans care more about their own sexual pleasures than their own families and children anymore. They expect the government to take care of their kids and their problems, manifested in such spectacles as mass shootings, drug use, and alleged addiction to Facebook.

That’s the appeal of Big Government socialism. In effect, we have lost control and so public authorities and institutions must control our families, our kids, and even the weapons we need for self-defense against Big Government.

In the wake of this family breakdown, the Cultural Marxists and their allies, some of them dupes with no real understanding of what they are doing and whose aims they serve, have decided to go in for the kill.

The transgender movement, itself started by a communist named Lesley Feinberg,  we see today was a natural outgrowth of the “gay” movement.

If there was ever a true “American Marxist,” to use Levin’s jargon, it was Harry Hay. He was the personification of family disintegration and breakdown. Levin’s book doesn’t mention him, perhaps because one of his employers, Fox News, hires and promotes homosexuals and transgenders (Bruce Jenner), and underwrites the activities of the Association of LGBTQ Journalists.

Hay was a Communist Party member who started the modern gay rights movement in America after divorcing his wife. He contracted a venereal disease, became a “radical fairy” with an interest in the occult, and marched for the cause of adults having sex with children.

Some might say he was mentally ill. No, he was a communist.

That’s the next phase – pedophilia. In fact, the cover-up regarding this “sexual orientation” is already underway.

Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s deep and dark secret is that he was a bisexual who used homosexuality, blackmail, and extortion to acquire wealth and power. Later, Epstein used the young girls to provide blackmail material on other elites.

In the latest revelation, we see reports that Epstein was using a Russian “bridge player” to blackmail billionaire Bill Gates.

It looks like a typical Russian honey trap.

Democratic Party's Lenin Statue in Seattle

Whatever the circumstances and ultimate truth about the “bridge player,” consider how easy must it be for the communists to trap our top people. But rest assured that Gates, who just went through a costly divorce, will be protected

Why The Marxists Always Win (use the smith act & treason on democratic party)

 “I knew it was a good [debt] deal when I saw the lefties screaming.” With that foolish statement, former Director of the National Economic Council under Trump and current Fox Business host Larry Kudlow demonstrated his ignorance of how Marxists create “conflict” that benefits the expansion of government control over our lives.

Kudlow buys into the notion of “conflict” being proof that his position is the correct one when the conflict is being staged to make people like him fall for the notion that the Marxists have lost the battle. In fact, they have already won the war.

The war, in this case, is more debt, thus expanding government and shrinking the private sector. This is what House Speaker Kevin McCarthy agreed to.

According to Marxists, the essence of economic life is struggle, as conflict develops, and “progress” is made.  Practically speaking, this means the coming of an all-powerful government, known as the communist state. As they see it, we are now in the socialist phase, on the road to communism.

Even with the original Republican proposal, the Republicans had agreed to spend more money and go further into debt. But the McCarthy proposal is even more of a surrender, causing some conservatives under fire from over-taxed constituents to utter peeps of protest.

But these conservatives already voted to make McCarthy the Speaker. They have been played as fools and now have egg all over their faces.

Because the Marxists are going through the motions of acting disappointed with the debt deal, it must be good, Kudlow says. He calls them “lefties” when they are far so far to the left that they are more accurately described as hard-core Marxists. And Marxists understand how to exploit conflict so their side prevails in the long run. That’s Marxist dialectics. And conservatives like Kudlow are falling for it.

Our book, The Sword of Revolution and the Communist Apocalypse explains how Marxist dialectics has been used by such figures as Barack Hussein Obama and confuses people about the nature and goals of communism.

The Democrats have learned a lot from Obama.

Consider Obamacare. It was sold by Obama as the “Affordable Care Act,” when it was based on what even the liberal “fact-checkers” admitted was the “lie of the year” – “If you like your health care, you can keep it.”

After he engineered the “fundamental transformation” of America, which included the socialized medicine scheme known as Obamacare, the debate moved even further to the left.  Congressional Republicans failed to terminate this program under Trump when then-Senator John McCain voted with the Democrats to save it.

Today, Republicans don’t even pretend to be opposed to this Obama-era program. Indeed, in 2022, Republicans didn’t run on the issue, even though it’s a major factor in the debt and spending problems and the massive expansion of government power we face today.

This is how government grows and debt rises to overcome the so-called “debt ceiling.”

House Speaker McCarthy should have insisted on the repeal of Obamacare in his debt ceiling “negotiations.” But he negotiated on left-wing terms, a victory for the Marxists.

By framing the issue in terms favorable to the Marxists, the Marxists always win. First, they move the entire debate to the left. In this case, the issue was already framed in terms of expanding the debt.   The debate should have been whether to let the federal government default, as former President Trump suggested. At this rate of spending, it’s going to come sooner or later.

Biden’s Treasury Department argued that “Failing to increase the debt limit would have catastrophic economic consequences.” Where is the proof? Increasing the debt limit in the past has already had catastrophic economic consequences.

We are told that the debt ceiling was created with “the good intention of constraining reckless spending,” as one writer put it. If it’s a true “debt ceiling,” why raise it? Why not, instead, mandate immediate spending cuts? That was the only legitimate option.

We are told that the U.S. government would “run out of money” unless Congress passes a bill to raise the debt limit. The Wall Street Journal claims that McCarthy’s deal is raise the debt ceiling “in exchange for spending cuts.” But the cuts are only in the rate of growth of spending. Common sense tells you that raising the debt ceiling means more debt based on more spending.

You don’t have to be a financial genius to question this never-ending series of statements threatening an economic apocalypse.

Former President Trump had said, “I say to the Republicans out there — congressmen, senators — if they don’t give you massive cuts, you’re going to have to do a default. And I don’t believe they’re going to do a default because I think the Democrats will absolutely cave, will absolutely cave because you don’t want to have that happen. But it’s better than what we’re doing right now because we’re spending money like drunken sailors.”

But McCarthy did not follow Trump’s advice. He caved, not the Democrats.

The Trump position was dismissed when it should have been a legitimate starting point for the debate. Indeed, some would argue that it would be wiser for the federal government to go through a default, in the same way that bankruptcy allows a company to be reorganized, and that such an approach is needed with the bloated and out-of-control federal government.

Remember that, on top of the national debt of $31 trillion, there is the matter of “unfunded liabilities,” estimated at $93.1 trillion or more.

The Treasury Department’s own Financial Report of the United States Government says “The current fiscal path is unsustainable.” Under these conditions, McCarthy has agreed to more debt and more spending.

The House should have held hearings on a default, analyzing how the money should be spent and for what constitutional purposes. Under these circumstances, the Constitution would dictate that spending on national defense would have to be a priority.

Since there’s not enough money to spend on all the rest of the federal programs, unless new massive “progressive” taxes are implemented, we desperately need an alternative form of money that people can use for their own needs, bypassing the federal tax system.

To his credit, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has endorsed decentralized cryptocurrencies, over which the federal government has no control. By contrast, Biden favors a centrally controlled digital currency through the Federal Reserve and his Securities and Exchange Commission has engineered a crackdown on the crypto sector.

“They want to get rid of crypto,” DeSantis said of Biden & Company. “They don’t like crypto because they can’t control crypto, so they want to put everything in a central bank digital currency.” This is what the regime is doing in Communist China, DeSantis noted.

What China is doing could be described as the next phase by the Marxists, as we move into full-blown communism, a “financial surveillance state, where they know every transaction that you’re making,” DeSantis warned.

It should be obvious by now that the federal government has too much control over our money, and that money is quickly losing its value. We need a new beginning, a new revolution, the kind waged by our Founding Fathers.

Where Did Millions in Tax Dollars to Russia and China Really Go? Ernst Gives Us an Idea.

 It's no secret that hardworking American taxpayers often watch as the fruits of their labor are co-opted by the government and used to fund projects, agencies, or priorities that don't align with their own. It's frustrating, but taxes are notoriously the one certain thing other than death.

Some federal government uses of tax dollars are more inexplicable and infuriating than others, especially those that see revenues leave America's shores while taxpayers see their fellow citizens — sometimes even their own families — struggling to build a good life at home.

Well, prepare to be even more infuriated at bloated government and its use of tax revenues thanks to new analysis of tax dollars that ended up in Russia and China over the past five years released by U.S. Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) on Wednesday afternoon.

According to this new review of federal spending in Russia and China, more than $490 million worth of taxpayer-funded grants and contracts were awarded to entities in China while even more — $870 million — went to Russian entities. That's just the $1.3 billion-plus tax dollars that could be tracked to Russia and China, as Ernst notes, because federal agencies aren't currently required to follow tax dollars to their ultimate destination and report that information.

What's more, the federal government itself has admitted there's a "government-wide issue" with its limited ability to track tax dollars. In a Government Accountability Office report from earlier this year, the GAO explained this flaw:

    For example, the Department of Health and Human Services obligated funding through assistance awards to study infectious diseases, and the Department of State obligated funding through contracts to purchase goods and services for U.S. government operations in China. U.S. award recipients also provided funding through subawards to entities located in China. However, the full extent of these subawards is unknown because of limitations in the completeness and accuracy of subaward data reported in government systems. For example, subaward data may be incomplete because award recipients are required to provide information only for subawards valued at $30,000 or more, in accordance with federal subaward reporting requirements. Limitations in subaward data is a government-wide issue and not unique to U.S. funding to entities in China.
=
"It is gravely concerning that no one in Washington can actually account for millions sent to Russia and China for pointless projects. But I have the receipts," Senator Ernst told Townhall. "I’m shining a light on this reckless spending, so bureaucrats can no longer cover up their tracks and taxpayers can know exactly what their hard-earned dollars are funding."

What was found in the analysis of taxpayer-funded projects in Russia and China over the last five years by Ernst included art exhibits for "gender equality," Russian research of alcohol addiction, food for American school lunches from Chinese companies, payments to a Russian company that has been sanctioned by the U.S. government, and more than $750,000 for a Russian government-run lab to put cats on treadmills.

So how did the work of Americans turn into paydays for those in Russia and China, including entities being economically punished by the U.S. government? An apparently staggering lack of accountability paired with a federal spending binge that seems to know no bounds.

To that end, Ernst — along with Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-WI) in the House — unveiled the Tracking Receipts to Adversarial Countries for Knowledge of Spending (TRACKS) Act on Wednesday to bring clearly needed transparency and accountability for taxpayer dollars as they make their way around the world while making it more difficult for waste, fraud, and abuse to go unnoticed and unchecked.

The TRACKS Act would amend the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 to require those spending U.S. tax dollars to "collect and report data relating to subawards granted to entities outside of the United States" and to make that information publicly available for oversight, holding the government more accountable to the taxpayers who fund it.

"Washington’s continued spending is so out of hand it is losing track of Americans’ hard-earned taxpayer dollars," E

Here's What Trump Is Proposing to Combat the Border Crisis

 Former President Donald Trump announced via Breitbart on Tuesday that he will work to eliminate birthright citizenship on day one of his new term should he take back the White House, saying the policy is a "magnet" for illegal immigration.

"As part of my plan to secure the border, on day one of my new term in office I will sign an executive order making clear to federal agencies that under the correct interpretation of the law going forward the future children of illegal aliens will not receive automatic U.S. citizenship," Trump said in a video.

"My policy will choke off a major incentive for continued illegal immigration, deter more migrants from coming, and encourage many of the aliens Joe Biden has unlawfully let into our country to go back to their home countries. They must go back. Nobody could afford this. Nobody could do this—and even morally it’s so wrong," he continued, adding the United States, "is among the only countries in the world that says that even if neither parent is a citizen nor even lawfully in the country their future children are automatic citizens the moment the parents trespass onto our soil."

Trump said the new policy will end "'birth tourism' where hundreds of thousands of people from all over the planet squat in hotels for their last few weeks of pregnancy to illegitimately and illegally obtain U.S. citizenship for the child, often to later exploit chain migration to jump the line and get green cards for themselves and their family members."

Trump ran on ending birthright citizenship during his first campaign in 2015. After entering into office, he signaled he was going to go through the campaign promise a few times during his term but his administration ultimately did not end birthright citizenship.

In the time since he left office, hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants have been allowed to enter the United States under the Biden administration. Common among them have been pregnant women who have given birth.

White House Left Shocked When Asked If Biden Is 'Corrupt'

 A reporter asked National Security Council spokesman John Kirby a question that nearly every American in their right mind could answer. However, he was left speechless.

During a White House press briefing, New York Post reporter Steven Nelson asked Kirby if President Joe Biden is corrupt, leaving him incapable of responding.

"There have been many developments in the House investigations into the first family's international business dealings recently," Nelson said, referring to the GOP-led House Oversight Committee's investigation into the Biden family. "So what do you say to the majority of Americans who believe that the president is himself corrupt?"

"Wow," Kirby said, followed by a long silence.

"The president has spoken to this, and there's nothing to these claims. And as for the whistleblower issue that you talked about in the document. I believe the FBI has spoken to that, and you're going to have to go to them on that," Kirby finally said.

    "What do you say to the majority of Americans who believe that the president is himself corrupt?

    Biden spokesman John Kirby: "Wow. The president has spoken to this and there’s nothing to these claims." pic.twitter.com/u9JEZPbkwa
    — RNC Research (@RNCResearch) May 31, 2023

The reporter pointed out House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer's (R-KY) efforts to obtain a document from the FBI that allegedly contains essential information regarding the president's relationship with a foreign national relating to the exchange of money for policy decisions.

However, FBI Director Christopher Wray has so far refused to comply and hand over the document, prompting Comer to hold the FBI in contempt of Congress.

After holding a call with Wray, Comer confirmed the "existence of the FD-1023 form alleging then-VP Biden engaged in a criminal bribery scheme with a foreign national."