Monday, August 08, 2022

George Soros and Sesantis

 

The now-suspended George Soros backed prosecutor Andrew Warren is speaking out against Gov. Ron DeSantis’ (R-Fla) decision to oust him from his position. 

During a press conference, Warren accused DeSantis of “undermining democracy” with “unconstitutional action.” 

“People need to understand this isn’t the governor trying to suspend the one elected official… This is the governor trying to overthrow democracy here in Hillsborough County,” Warren boldly claimed. 

Warren continued to say that he was “blindsided” by his suspension after he was escorted out of his office by police officers without any warning. 

“Unfortunately, yesterday, an armed deputy escorted me out of my office with no warning, not even a chance to read the order,” Warren said, adding “This was something that wasn’t planned. So, right now, my concern over the past 24 hours has been making sure that the office continues doing the work that we’ve been doing for the past five and a half years.”

Calling the action a “blatant abuse of power,” Warren claimed that the official order contained “a lot of conjecture and lies.” 

Despite calling DeSantis’ move “unconstitutional,” Warren failed to explain what is unconstitutional about DeSantis’ order. Instead, he continued to blame his own wrongdoing on DeSantis trying to boost his own presidential dreams. 

Earlier this week, DeSantis announced he was suspending Warren for “neglect of duty” for vowing to not to enforce state laws on abortion and child sex-change operations.

“When you flagrantly violate your oath of office, when you make yourself above the law, you have violated your duty, you have neglected your duty, and you are displaying a lack of competence to be able to perform those duties, and so today, we are suspending State Attorney Andrew Warren, effective immediately,” DeSantis said.

Thursday, August 04, 2022

The White House Is Already Revising Biden Afghanistan Withdrawal History

 

In Tuesday’s White House press briefing, as usual, Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre was joined by someone else from the Biden administration to kick off the day. This time, it was the National Security Council’s John Kirby, who was previously press secretary at the Pentagon.

Asked about the U.S. drone strike in Kabul over the weekend that killed Al Qaeda’s leader and 9/11 plotter Aiman Al-Zawahiri, Kirby attempted to change the facts that President Biden delivered to the country one year ago during his disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan. 

Kirby claimed that the Biden administration always knew that members of Al Qaeda remained in Afghanistan during and after Biden’s withdrawal, but that’s not what President Biden said one year ago. As Katie reminded on Monday evening, the president had said Al Qaeda was “gone” from Afghanistan in one of many attempts to justify the United States’ departure. 

Kirby is claiming the administration said last summer that Al Qaeda was still in Afghanistan. President Biden did not say that. Biden said Al Qaeda was “gone.” pic.twitter.com/hnHF9Wn3TW— Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) August 2, 2022

Peter Doocy called Kirby out on the contradiction and for his attempt to rewrite history during the briefing and the Biden spox didn’t do a great job rectifying the two opposing statements of supposed fact.

“I mean, in a major way, Al Qaeda was not playing… a major role uh, in operations, uh, or resourcing or planning in Afghanistan,” Kirby asserted. “But Peter — I know specifically because I was at a different podium a year ago — and we talked about the fact that Al Qaeda had a presence in Afghanistan, but small, and not incredibly powerful or potent,” Kirby claimed. “I think, again without getting into numbers we would still assess that to be the case.”

Watch:

Peter Doocy takes John Kirby to task over President Biden saying Al Qaeda was “gone” from Afghanistan.

KIRBY: “We talked about the fact that Al Qaeda had a presence in Afghanistan but small…” pic.twitter.com/lYDlpZl8X1— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) August 2, 2022

But Biden, of course, did not make any of those qualifications one year ago in his speech from the White House. He said unequivocally that Al Qaeda was “gone” and therefore the U.S. didn’t have an interest in Afghanistan. But that didn’t keep Biden from taking a victory lap on Monday night when he announced the successful strike on the leader of a group he said was no more.

Kirby also used Tuesday’s briefing to rewrite current reality and claim that Biden’s withdrawal hadn’t in fact handed Afghanistan over to a bunch of terrorists — including the Taliban, ISIS-K, and Al Qaeda — and then contradicted his comments earlier on Tuesday:

Afghanistan is run and controlled by the Taliban. The Taliban was harboring Ayman al-Zawahiri. This morning, Kirby told CNN Al Qaeda is actively using Afghanistan as a safe harbor to plan attacks. https://t.co/qAJhLzmgv2— Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) August 2, 2022

As August continues and more one year anniversaries of the Biden administrations disastrous — and deadly — withdrawal from Afghanistan go by, it’s safe to assume there will be more revisions of history coming from the White House podium as the Biden administration seeks to erase the damaging record of a haphazard and rudderless departure that shocked America’s allies and emboldened our foes.

The Ukrainian Verdun

 

Five months after Russia invaded Ukraine, the war is now reduced to one of attrition. The current dirty, grinding slog is fought mostly with artillery and rockets. Everything from Ukraine’s shopping centers to apartment buildings — and the civilians in them — are Russian targets.

Most outsiders have already forgotten the heroic Ukrainian winter repulse of the botched Russian shock-and-awe effort to sweep into Kyiv, decapitate the government, and declare the eastern half of the country a Russian protectorate within mere days.

Months later, the long war devolves further into a contest of mass and weight — tons of explosives blowing up pathways for massed troops grabbing a few more charred miles of ruined landscape.

Russian President Vladimir Putin bets he can throw in more men and more shells than Ukraine and its Western suppliers can match. He is quite willing to “win” by laying waste to eastern Ukraine even if it means losing three Russian soldiers for every Ukrainian.

When war becomes such gridlocked carnage, each side looks to new game-changing diplomacy, strategies, allies, or weapons to break the deadlock.

For Putin, such escalation means more flesh, steel, and explosives. His country is 28 times bigger than Ukraine, and over three times more populous, with an economy 15 times larger.

As for Putin’s financial reserves, the Western oil boycott means increasingly little to him when 40% of the planet’s population in India and China are eager to secure near-limitless Russian energy.

Another 750 million people in Europe once talked tough. But as a second winter nears, their gas and oil imports from Russia will further wither. Then their Churchillian rhetoric may chill.

So, the Ukrainian war increasingly will depend on endless U.S. aid and escalation.

To stop the Russian steamroller, Ukraine demands sophisticated American missiles to sink Russia’s Black Sea Fleet. Kyiv requests shipments of U.S. jet fighters to knock down Putin’s missiles and planes.

It asks for more rockets and artillery to ensure tit-for-tat retaliation for every incoming Russian shell and bomb. Kyiv negotiates for more Western intelligence to take out more Russian generals and more lift capacity to stage airborne raids into Mother Russia itself.

We in the West abhor Putin’s war as senseless carnage, the last mad act of a vainglorious and delusional dictator.

Yet Putin trusts that future Russian generations will come to appreciate his grinding effort as the brutal restoration work of Vladimir the Great. When the wreckage is forgotten, Putin is convinced he will be viewed as the world’s most successful irredentist — one who had already battered Georgia, Ossetia, Chechnya, Crimea, and Eastern Ukraine back into the reborn Russian empire.

If Putin can smash Ukraine into submission, the former jewel in the Russian imperial crown, then he thinks he can eventually swallow all the remaining former Soviet republics that are far less formidable than Ukraine.

The United States is nearing a gut-check decision. There are plenty of dangerous firsts in radically upping our role with Ukraine. No one quite knows the post-Cold War rules of engagement when one nuclear power openly fights the surrogate of another.

In the old days of the Soviet Union and a backward Maoist China, conventional American triangulation ensured that neither nuclear power grew closer to each other than to us.

After Ukraine, both nuclear powers are de facto allies, ganging up on a common American enemy. As global inflation spikes, recession looms, and oil prices soar, some of our sworn and de facto allies, including India and Turkey, prefer Russian oil to Western sermons.

The heroic Ukrainian resistance may have brought European NATO states and the United States closer. But oddly, Ukraine’s supporters seemed to have soured the rest of the world on Western economic boycotts and sanctions — and the torpid leadership of President Joe Biden and his European counterparts.

In the West, there are dissident rumblings of a possible plebiscite to adjudicate the Russian-speaking Ukrainian borderlands — with possible guarantees of an Austria-like, non-NATO neutrality for Ukraine.

But such compromise talk earns charges of appeasement from Western zealots. Apparently, American moralists intend to fight for the principle of the sanctity of national borders to the last Ukrainian.

Vastly upping aid to Ukraine has become the cause celebre of the West. But few have fully explained the ensuing costs and dangers of escalation to the American people. The United States appears to be heading into a stagflationary recession following the loss of deterrence from the Afghanistan catastrophe and with restive renegades like Iran and North Korea joining the Beijing-Moscow nuclear axis.

For now, no one knows whether greater American escalation would tip the balance for an allied democratic victory, and a repeat of our savior role in the two World Wars. Or will the proxy war suck the United States into a Vietnam, Iraq, or Afghanistan-like quagmire?

Worse: Will our intervention trump even the brinkmanship of the Cuban Missile Crisis –with the nuclear standoff nightmarishly unpredictable?

Why We Lost Trust in the Expert Class

 

For years, European policymakers had assured the world that the relatively rapid “transition” to “green” energy was the world’s preordained future — regardless of the costs.

Accordingly, many European Union governments followed the advice of green experts. They eagerly shut down coal, natural gas, and nuclear power plants to transition immediately to “renewable energy.”

Most citizens were afraid to object that in cloudy, cold Germany solar panels were not viable methods of electrical generation — especially in comparison to the country’s vast coal deposits and its large, model nuclear power industry.

As a result, German government officials warn that this winter, in 19th-century fashion, families will have to burn wood — the dirtiest of modern fuels — to endure the cold. And there is further talk of “warm rooms,” where like pre-civilizational tribal people, the elderly will bunch together within a designated heated room to keep alive.

Sri Lanka may be the first modern nation to adopt deliberate policies that have led to mass hunger and bankruptcy. The government, for a variety of reasons, listened to foreign advocates of back-to-nature organic farming, specifically outright abandonment of highly effective synthetic fertilizers and pesticides.

The result was endemic crop failure. Cash crops for export failed. Widespread hunger followed. Without foreign exchange, it became impossible to import key staples like food and fuel.

Sri Lanka once had a per capita income twice that of nearby India. Now it cannot feed or fuel itself.

Unfortunately, its incompetent government trusted radical environmental advisors, many of them foreign experts. Sri Lanka believed it could become the woke darling of the “Environmental, Social, Governance” movement, and in that way draw in unlimited Western woke investment.

Instead, it has embraced a policy of national suicide.

Recently, a group of 55 distinguished pro-administration economists assured us that President Joe Biden’s massive borrowing and new entitlements agenda were not inflationary. In September 2021, these economists with 14 Nobel prize winners among them declared that Biden’s inflationary policies would actually “ease” inflation.

Last month, inflation spiked to an annualized rate of 9.1%.

None of these “blue-chip” economists have offered any apologies for lending their prestige to convince Americans of the absurd: that inflating the money supply, spiking new government spending, incentivizing labor non-participation, and keeping interest rates artificially low would not cause inflation.

In late July 2021, General Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, claimed that the Taliban takeover “was not a foregone conclusion.” He bragged that 34 provincial capitals were still in Afghan government hands.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin nodded in approval. Less than a month later, the entire Afghan government collapsed. The American military fled in its most ignominious retreat in over 50 years. Milley had been parroting Biden’s earlier prompt that a Taliban victory after the American evacuation was “highly unlikely.”

On the eve of the 2020 election, news accounts revealed some of the lurid contents on Hunter Biden’s lost laptop. Emails and photos began to incriminate the entire Biden family for leveraging millions of dollars from foreign grandees for access to a bought Joe Biden.

Fifty retired intelligence officers, however, without evidence, swore that the laptop’s appearance could be due to “Russian disinformation.” Yet after authentication — Hunter himself never denied the lost laptop was his — few if any of those marquee “experts” apologized for their election-driven dissimulation.

At the height of the massive 2020 enforced quarantine and lockdowns, some 1,200 medical and health “professionals” signed a petition claiming that thousands of left-wing protestors should be exempt from the very quarantine they had insisted on for others.

The experts absurdly claimed that denying tens of thousands the right to break quarantines to protest in the street was a greater health threat than COVID-19.

FBI Director James Comey doggedly pursued the “Russian collusion” hoax. At one point he hired the discredited Christopher Steele to supply the FBI with information from his fantasy dossier.

Once called to account, on some 245 occasions before Congress, Comey swore that he could either not remember or had no knowledge about the questions asked of him.

His successor FBI interim Director Andrew McCabe admittedly lied on four occasions to federal officials. Special counsel and former FBI director Robert Mueller himself swore under oath that he knew nothing either about the Steele dossier or Fusion GPS — the twin catalysts for his entire investigation.

FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith admitted to altering a federal court document in efforts to convict an innocent suspect.

All these depressing examples have one common denominator: Elite experts and degreed professionals massaged and warped their knowledge to serve ideological masters, rather than the truth.

In the process, they caused untold damage to their country and fellow citizens. They disgraced their profession. They tarnished the scientific community. And sold their souls to ideologues.

Is it any wonder why the Western public has lost confidence in their degreed and credentialed elites?

Monday, August 01, 2022

China Threatens to Shoot Pelosi Out of the Sky if She Approaches Taiwan

ust as we were wondering if Pelosi was going to visit Taiwan, China has thrown down the gauntlet.

A Chinese news media outlet affiliated with run by the Communists threatened to blow Pelosi out of the sky if her plane dares to visit Taiwan.

If US fighter jets escort Pelosi’s plane into Taiwan, it is invasion. The PLA has the right to forcibly dispel Pelosi’s plane and the US fighter jets, including firing warning shots and making tactical movement of obstruction. If ineffective, then shoot them down.

If US fighter jets escort Pelosi’s plane into Taiwan, it is invasion. The PLA has the right to forcibly dispel Pelosi’s plane and the US fighter jets, including firing warning shots and making tactical movement of obstruction. If ineffective, then shoot them down. https://t.co/V7LhrXgXoM

— Hu Xijin 胡锡进 (@HuXijin_GT) July 29, 2022

The threat comes just as Pelosi is about to take to the possibly not-so-friendly skies on an overseas trip and shortly after China’s commie leader, Xi Jinping, allegedly threatened Biden over Taiwan during a two-hour phone call between the two business partners world leaders.

“Those who play with fire will only get burnt,” the Chinese president told Biden during a phone call. “Hope the U.S. side can see this clearly.” China firmly opposes Taiwan independence and the interference of external forces, Xi said.

BEIJING, July 29 (Reuters) – Chinese leader Xi Jinping told U.S. President Joe Biden on Thursday that the United States should abide by the ‘one China’ principle with regard to Taiwan and ensure that its actions are consistent with its words, Chinese state media reported.

— Hümeyra Pamuk (@humeyra_pamuk) July 28, 2022

Some Republicans believe Pelosi should tell the Chicoms to shove it and enjoy a cup of tea at Taiwan’s Sun Moon Lake.

“Speaker Pelosi should go to Taiwan and President Biden should make it abundantly clear to Chairman Xi that there’s not a damn thing the Chinese Communist Party can do about it,” Sen Ben Sasse (R- Neb.) stated. “No more feebleness and self-deterrence. This is very simple, Taiwan is an ally and the Speaker of the House of Representatives should meet with the Taiwanese men and women who stare down the threat of Communist China.”

Will Pelosi risk her own death and possibly WWIII by visiting the island of Chinese freedom, or will she obey her masters the wishes of the Chinese pinkos and cancel her trip