When Andrew Breitbart died, someone I knew responded to my Facebook
post about it with a nasty celebration of it. When I responded that he
was actually a good friend of mine and told that person not only where
they could go straight to, but what they could do to themselves on the
way, I quickly received a phone call from them apologizing. They “hadn’t
realized” that I was actually friends with him, as if that made them
being a sociopathic asshole cheering someone’s death simply because they
wouldn’t conform to the politics the “tolerant” left, somehow better.
We’ve seen this again, but even more so, with the assassination of
Charlie Kirk. When someone shows you who they are, believe them.
I let it slide with Andrew, the guy was young and I’d never really
experienced anything like that before, so I was forgiving and wrote it
off as an anomaly. Plus, I think Andrew would’ve laughed at the idea
that he was still exposing “tolerant leftists” for the intolerant pieces
of garbage they are, even in death.
While Andrew being in a
better place was a comfort, that never overrides the sadness of losing a
friend. While I can’t say I was good friends with Charlie Kirk, there
was very little daylight on policies between him, me and millions upon
millions of Americans who mostly want to be lef alone by the vacuous
left. But the nature of “progressivism” is to not leave anyone alone –
it demands obedience, not only of actions but of thought.
We refuse to obey, we refuse to conform, and they killed Charlie for it.
Yes,
the shooter pulled the trigger, but every MSNBC guest to called a
conservative a fascist carved their letters into the bullet casing.
Every elected and media Democrat who chose to dehumanize rather than
debate, looked through that scope. Every single person on the left who
knew better, who saw this coming but found the inciting rhetoric
politically useful and easier than making an argument for their
positions steadied that killer’s hand. They all did this because they
knew this was down the road they were traveling and did nothing to stop
it.
There isn’t a single Democrat, before Charlie’s assassination,
who stood up to their party and said, “Hey, everyone who disagrees with
you isn’t a fascist Nazi monster trying to kill people.” Not one. And
there isn’t a conservative commentor, columnist or pundit who doesn’t
get regular threats from these same, unhinged people. Those cheering
Charlie’s murder would cheer yours too – you either have that in you or
you do not.
I love the people who say things like “That’s what you get when you
put hate in the world.” I shudder to think what their concept of love is
if, in the aftermath of a murder of a human being who did nothing but
speak words they didn’t like, they think they’re spreading anything
close to love. From Eric Swalwell to Jasmine Crockett, Rachel Maddow to
Joe Biden, there is enough blood for every leftist’s hands. Many of them
have suffered losses – the despicable Jamie Raskin had a son who killed
himself, and yet he’s out there cheerleading for violence and
murder…right up until they got it.
Now they’re all, “This isn’t good” and “Political violence is wrong.” Too late. They did this.
Their
army of drones are still celebrating Charlie’s killing and not one of
them has forcefully called them; told the radicals to go to Hell and
they aren’t welcome in their party. The closest thing to criticism of
those ghouls you see is a lament that publicly celebrating is “bad for
the party.”
“Don’t do that, it hurts the party” is a poor excuse
for decency, but when you don’t have any in you a poor excuse is the
best you can muster.
People I’ve known for years have exposed
themselves as monsters it never occurred to me that they could be. There
is something about the progressive ideology that perverts the mind. The
father of 2 isn’t’ even in the ground yet and they’re writing pieces
like, “If Kirk was a victim
of a pernicious culture of violence in America, it also must be
acknowledged he was an author of that culture.” (Don’t worry, you can
click the link – it’s to a third-party paywall bypassing website that
doesn’t give them any ad money.)
If the author of that piece were to be assassinated while pumping
gas, is it cool if we cheer? I don’t know him, nor do I care that he
exists, so the end of that existence on Earth doesn’t matter to me.
Still, I wouldn’t because I’m not a piece of shit like he is. Nancy
Pelosi will die, as will Joe Biden, should we be picking our musical
selections to dance on their graves to? No. If someone pulled a Luigi
Mangione on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on the street one day, should
people celebrate that “she had it coming” because she was different from
us politically? Hell no.
Yet, these very same people and the
people who follow them would do it to you, me and everyone on our side
in a heartbeat. If you think your friend or family member who is glad
Charlie is dead wouldn’t do the same if you were killed, you haven’t
been paying attention. If they insist they wouldn’t because the “know
you,” that makes it even worse – it shows them to be sociopaths who have
to problem with the concept of murder over politics, they just don’t
want it too close to home.
The concept is the problem. Their politics are the problem.
Have
you noticed how all of these garbage people aren’t quoting Charlie
Kirk’s actual words or posting videos of him engaging in debates, they
simply declare him to be anti-this, that or the other thing. “He’s a
this kind of -phobe,” or “that kind of -ist.” They don’t quote him
because they never actually listened to him, they only heard him in
quick MSNBC soundbites and half-quotes out of someone else’s mouth.
The New York Times exemplified this when they had to issue the following correction
to an article trying to smear him. “A correction was made on Sept. 11,
2025: An earlier version of this article described incorrectly an
antisemitic statement that Charlie Kirk had made on an episode of his
podcast. He was quoting a statement from a post on social media and went
on to critique it. It was not his own statement.”
They didn’t
bother to look because they were told Charlie was an anti-Semite, just
like all of those people were told he was some kind of monster or
another and didn’t bother to check for themselves. Democrats are not
known for verifying things…or thinking.
Democrats never bother to
look, they simply obey. They outsource responsibility for their problems
and the “solution” to them. And they create problems for everyone else
because they insist others obey too. If they were only hell-bent on
creating their hellscape world for themselves, no one would care. But
like Harvey Weinstein, they insist on trying to force their desires on
everyone.
A majority of Americans said no. Charlie Kirk said no
and they murdered him for it. Will he be the last person murdered by a
radicalized Democrat? Of course not.
I’ve been writing for the
better part of a decade about how the Democratic Party establishment was
walking a fine line between keeping their followers simmering in an
emotional frenzy and hoping they didn’t boil over into a full blood
thirty murder frenzy. That’s where they are now. Seemingly normal people
cheering murder for the “crime” of thinking how you do; for voting how
you do. Do you really think they’d act differently if it were you? How
could you ever trust these people again? How could you trust them around
your children knowing they’ve expressed joy over Charlie’s kids growing
up without him?
The left is a cancer on the country, and cancer kills. We’ve always said that when someone
shows
you who they are, believe them. They’ve shown you who they are, believe
them. More importantly, beat them. At the ballot box and in life.
Someday
they will wake up and realize the monsters they’ve become, and they’ll
try to move past it. Never let them forget. The website
CharliesMurderers.com is cataloging every sick thing they’ve put out in
the world about this murder, complete with their faces, names and
employers when they can find it. Make them famous, and make them
unemployable.
If they wake up from their rage hangover and try to
pretend they didn’t do something shameful, let that website be the
herpes that follows them around. The “regrets” over consequences are already starting, may it haunt them until they truly know, accept and change from the horrors they are.
Unless and until then, and maybe even after that, to hell with them.
There’s
much more to say on this, and this is probably horribly rambling and
disorganized because of the rawness of it all. I just don’t care right
now; there will be time for clarity of thought later. In the meantime,
let’s win.
