The Left’s Tesla Terrorism Agenda

 

I’d like to talk today about what I think I would call terror porn.

Terror porn is analogous to Hitler porn. Hitler porn, of course, is when you castigate or denigrate a public figure by comparing them to Hitler. Sort of like The New Republic putting a cover with President Donald Trump with a Hitler mustache dressed up as a Nazi leader. And that, we saw that all during the campaign in various manifestations.

But right now there’s an effort to sort of legitimize terror, and here’s what I mean. As we scan the news, Tesla dealerships, Tesla charging stations, individual Tesla owners are either being doxxed or targeted for violent acts. We’ve had cases where Tesla drivers were pushed off the road and confronted by left-wing activists. We’ve had Molotov cocktails thrown at dealerships and we’ve had Tesla charging stations that were attacked.

What is the point of all of this? The point is to send a message that anyone who would buy a Tesla or drive a Tesla or even have Tesla stock should not because by the use of this violent activity, they’re trying to drive down Elon Musk’s popularity and indeed his viability.

And this is what’s very ironic about it. One of the ways that the Left is doing this is not just to use all of this left-wing money that comes through nongovernment organizations, foundations, political action committees, and filter it to these various groups, but to have mainstream spokespeople engage themselves in terror porn.

I’ll give you some examples.

The late-night comedian Jimmy Kimmel said something along the lines, “Well, we shouldn’t burn Teslas.” But then he had this pregnant pause, “We shouldn’t burn Teslas.” Meaning, of course, you should do that.

Gov. Tim Walz, we talked before, has sizable investments in Tesla stock in Minnesota, of which he is the governor. He’s in charge of protecting that investment for the taxpayers. He went on stage and bragged that his app said that the Tesla price was going down, down, down. He called Elon Musk an a——. He was back at it again. We mentioned earlier he’d called him a nepo baby and a South African, questioning the legitimacy of his American citizenship, apparently.

Then we had Rep. Jasmine Crockett, who is online in Zooms and other venues trying to help organize “Stop Tesla” with a little qualifier: We don’t quite want violence—even though she knows that almost all of these efforts have a violent aspect to it.

You would’ve thought that astronaut Mark Kelly might have wanted to comment on the spectacular rescue of two astronauts that were brought back to Earth on the SpaceX super rocket. Instead, he didn’t do any of that sort. Instead, he cut a video showing that he’s getting rid of this car because he said he didn’t want this Tesla anymore because it was made by an a——. There must be some type of Democrat talking points that says you’re supposed to call Elon Musk an a——.

What is going on? What’s going on is this is the legacy of asymmetrical law enforcement over the Biden years.

If you were a protester on the abortion question and you were peaceable, peaceful, and you protested peacefully, but you were trying to limit abortion, the FBI was unleashed on you.

If you were a rioter in 2020 and for the month, the end of May, June, July, August, September into October you participated in burning a federal courthouse, a police precinct, an iconic church, you were part of the movement that destroyed $2 billion in property, resulted in 35 deaths, 1,500 police officers, and you were one of 14,000 people arrested, the chances that you were going to be arrested if you were 14,000 and then subsequently arraigned, indicted, convicted in jail were minuscule. It was just a fraction. In comparison with the Jan. 6 protesters, many of whom four years in prison and over 900 of them were convicted.

So what I’m getting at is, there was a message to the Left and it said, “If you engage in street violence, that is considered legitimate political protest, legitimate political protest, and there will not be legal consequences.”

A final note, Sen. Chuck Schumer, we’ve talked about before, is a very funny person and he poses as a sober and judicious senior spokesman of the Democratic Party and he is the Democrat, now, minority leader in the Senate.

He was the one, remember, as I’ve said on at least one broadcast, that said, “You, Justice Neil Gorsuch; you, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, have sown the wind and you will reap the whirlwind and you don’t know what’s hit you.”

He returned to that type of threats again when he recently said that, in defense of his activism—and remember, the far Left says he’s not activist enough—what he said was, “You shouldn’t get angry about me. I got all of these left-wing judges appointed that were cherry-picking to stop the Trump agenda through executive orders.” But here was the keyword, and he said, “We are sending people into Republican districts to disrupt and have consequences for their votes.”

So what I’m getting at is there’s a two-tier system. There’s the front-line soldiers who were burning Teslas and intimidating Tesla owners. Then there is the sober and judicious Democrat functionaries, the architecture of the progressive movement, who, with a wink and a nod, says, “We’ve gotta protest. We’ve gotta organize. But let’s not get violent.” But in fact, they are greenlighting violence themselves.

Left-Wing Judges Try to Stymie Trump

 

Ostensibly, President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance won an overwhelming victory, and you can define that in a variety of ways. Not just a plurality, but I think it would be called a referendum on America.

After all, they were the first ticket on the Republican side to have won the popular vote in 20 years. They won an overwhelming majority in the Electoral College. They retain control of the House of Representatives. They won the Senate. There’s a 6-3, supposedly, conservative majority on the Supreme Court. They won all of the swing states.

So, they came into office with this momentum from the American people that was expressed through a national election. And yet, they are now stymied.

Almost all of their initiatives are facing two types of opposition. The first is, in a pre-planned way, liberal organizations, lavishly funded by what they themselves might want to call oligarchs, have funded massive lawsuits against the Trump administration, stopping executive orders.

Remember, this idea that executive orders were a rapid and effective way for a president to rule didn’t come from Donald Trump. It came from former President Barack Obama. He recalibrated the use of executive orders when he lost the majority in Congress and he said, “I have a pen and I have a phone. And I’m gonna act accordingly.” And he did so.

But what we’re seeing now is that these liberal organizations are targeting left-wing judges.

Judge Ana Reyes in Washington—who was described as a Biden appointee, as the first Latina, LGBTQ—she just ruled to stop the Pentagon’s new policy, not having or forbidding transgendered people in combat units.

Judge Jesse Furman, another lower district judge, he just put out a stay not too long ago rescinding the deportation of Mahmoud Khalil.

And Judge James Boasberg stopped the deportation of this very dangerous Tren de Aragua gang of South American criminals who came here illegally.

Now, what was the argument that the Trump administration was using that incurred the wrath of liberal activists? All they wanted to do was say, “We don’t know the effect of transgendered people in combat units. This is a new phenomenon. For now, we’re gonna put a stay on it.” That was the Department of Defense and the Trump administration.

We don’t know how these people from South America and these gangs got here. But we do know they came illegally. And they are residing illegally. And they’re in very dangerous gangs and many of them have committed crimes. So, if it was—if they broke the law to come here, we want to enforce the law to have them go back.

Khalil, I think, as we’ve seen news accounts start to recalibrate the idea that he was just a neutral, semi-partisan, not very active supporter of Hamas, is not true. He was the official spokesman for the Apartheid Divest at Columbia University/Barnard College. He supported the massacres on Oct. 7. He was a big supporter and adherent of Hamas, which is a terrorist-designated organization.

And so, what we’re seeing is liberal groups trying to keep people who are supporting the terrorist Hamas or supporting these gangs inside the United States.

This is very analogous—cherry-picking left-wing judges is very analogous to what we watched all during the 2022-24 lawfare period.

You remember Judge Arthur Engoron, Judge Juan Merchan, and Judge Lewis Kaplan—he was the judge in the E. Jean Carroll case. And we had the Alvin Bragg judge and the Letitia James. They were all—like these judges, they had two things in common: They were left-wing activist judges, appointed by either former President Joe Biden, Obama, or former President Bill Clinton. And they had minor to major conflicts of interest where people in their family were big, either had worked for a prior Democratic administration or themselves were activists.

And what did they do? They tried to put Donald Trump in jail.

That same lawfare has now been transmogrified and put into a more concerted effort to stop everything that Donald Trump is trying to do. And what he’s trying to do, remember, is not radical. It’s just simply to enforce immigration law. It’s just simply to bring back the country to the middle.

Will this succeed? I don’t think so. I think the district courts will over—the appellate courts will overturn it, if not, then the Supreme Court. But they know that. The point is, they want to delay, delay, delay.

Donald Trump is already a lame-duck president. He only has four years left. And he has got less than two years before the midterm elections. Their plan is to drag all of these executive orders, which are backed by a vote of the people who elected Donald Trump, is to drag them through the courts and stop him. Create a sense of chaos. Make the Republicans, in general, and Donald Trump, in particular, overreact. And then, cause chaos, controversy, constitutional crisis. And eat up these precious four years.

As of now, it’s succeeding, but time will tell and we’ll weigh in next time.

The Lengths Democrats Are Willing to Go to Stop Trump

 

I want to apologize to you.

I have been writing columns and have suggested to you in these videos that the Democrats didn’t have an agenda. In other words, they were just nihilists. But I went back and looked at everything they’ve said, everything they’ve written, what their surrogates and the media have done, and I discovered they do have a counter-agenda. They really do. And it’s organized.

And I want to give it a fair hearing right now. So, I wrote down 10 things that I think are thematic of the Democratic agenda that offers an alternative to President Donald Trump.

The first is that Donald Trump must be considered, as Chris Matthews just said, a Mussolini-like figure. He must be opposed in every aspect. He must be demonized. Everything he does is evil.

And by extension, the same is true of Elon Musk. You must consider him an alien that should go back home to South Africa. That he’s not a true American. He’s only been here 23 years.

You cannot talk about his Tesla revolution that pretty much saved the idea of an electric vehicle. You cannot talk about the successes of SpaceX. You cannot talk about saving social media by opening it up and getting the government out, i.e., the FBI colluding with the old Twitter. You cannot talk about giving free internet service to Ukraine.

He’s evil. And everything he does must be opposed. And we must continue that to the point where he is depersonalized.

The second thing I’ve noticed, very quickly, is Immigration and Customs Enforcement is wrong. You have to stop ICE from deporting anybody, even if they’re a criminal.

Open borders are completely normal. We let in 12 million people under President Joe Biden. We have no apologies whatsoever. No major Democrat has come forward and said, “We made a mistake. We’ve overloaded communities, like the San Joaquin Valley or the Rio Grande Valley or the inner city. It’s cost us perhaps a trillion dollars in social costs. We apologize.”

No. Everything about open borders was wonderful. And we will try, as Democrats, as much as we can to stop ICE from deporting even criminals. Sanctuary cities are immune—600 of them.

Radical Palestinians are to be favored over Israel. We see that with the controversy over Mahmoud Khalil. We in the Democratic Party feel that Israel is a settler country.

Now, this is the only issue that the majority of Democrats are clearly for. About 70%, 65% of Democrats favor the Palestinian cause. So, there’s no ambiguity about it now.

Democrats feel that Israel is the culprit. And if there’s antisemitism on campus, it’s sporadic or it’s done by people other than the pro-Hamas green card holder or student visa holder.

There should be no cuts. No cuts in the federal government. We have a $1.7 trillion deficit. Joe Biden probably racked up $7 to $8 trillion in additional debt, but $36 trillion is no problem. We’re not going to discuss it.

All we know is there should be no layoffs. Everything that USAID was funding was fine. And the federal government was running perfectly until Donald Trump came. There was no abuse, fraud, anything. We have never talked about fraud and abuse in recent years. And there was a reason why we’re perfectly happy with these massive deficits.

Ukraine—Donald Trump with his “Art of the Deal” antics, threatening to cut off, cutting off, restoring aid to Ukraine, it’s a mess. We have to go back to the Biden approach. We’ll do whatever it takes for as long as it takes. So, we need to up the amount of aid, maybe $300 or $400 or $500 billion to Ukraine, and enable it to defeat Russia. And if that costs 2 or 3 million casualties, we don’t care.

We offered no alternative ceasefire plan, no strategic resolution, nothing other than to feed the Ukrainians to defeat Vladimir Putin and bleed out the Russian military forces, even if it takes the last Ukrainian to do so.

DEI should have never been cut out. We still have to emphasize that we are a country of white rage, white privilege, white supremacy. And we in the Democratic Party will find ways to work around these executive orders, but maybe we will have to reclassify the titles of diversity, equity, inclusion officers, but we will not give up on it.

We had a recent air traffic controller supervisor who was leaking the test questions to DEI applicants. This is the type of activity we endorse.

We have to be much more radical in our opposition. So when Donald Trump speaks before Congress, we must shout him down. Rep. Al Green is an iconic hero. Most of us refuse to censor him. He shook his cane and disrupted Congress. That’s good. Rep. Jasmine Crockett is the new spokesman of the Democratic Party.

And in association with that, also, it’s very important for us to use the F-word, the S— word, the D— word. We’re going to make videos where we use this profanity. We’re going to shout out that in Congress. The point is that to appeal to the lost middle-class supporter, we have to sound earthy. And we plan on doing that.

And finally, we’ve got to create chaos. So, anything Donald Trump, as I said, anything that Elon Musk does, any Cabinet members’ initiatives, we have to go hysterical.

And the point is this, we prefer slow decline. We understand we had $36 trillion in debt. We understand we were running a trillion-dollar trade deficit. We understand our military was shrinking. We understand that we were investing over a trillion dollars in a commissar like DEI. I could go on. But that was a slow decline. It wasn’t controversial.

With the open border, yes, it was open, but nobody, there was no hysteria. We just let in 12 million people illegally. We even flew them in at night so it wouldn’t bother you.

The point is slow decline. Quiet, calm is much preferable to loud restoration. Why cause all these problems? We were declining very slowly. We could have gone on like this for 20 years. But why did we have to suddenly think that we needed to stop and to arrest the decline?

That’s pretty much it. A 10-point agenda by the Democratic Party.

On the Left, They Knew They Were Lying to Us All Along

 

For years, the Left
has advanced utter untruths for cheap partisan purposes that they knew
at the time were all false. And now when caught, they just shrug and say
they were lying all along.

• Once it was known that the first COVID-19
  case originated in or near a Chinese communist virology lab engineering
  gain-of-function deadly viruses—with help from Western agencies—the
  Left went into full persecution mode.

They damned as incompetent, racist, and conspiratorial any who dared
follow logic and evidence to point out that the Chinese government and
its military were both culpable for the virus and lying

A million Americans died of COVID-19. Millions more suffered
long-term injuries. Still, the left-wing media and the Biden
administration demonized any who dared speak about a lab origin of the
deadly virus.The lies were designed to protect the guilty who had helped fund the virus’s origins, such as Drs. Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins.

The Biden government also tried to use the lab theory to ridicule a supposedly pro-Trump “conspiracy.”Western corporate interests deeply invested in China did not want their partner held responsible for veritably killing and maiming hundreds of millions worldwide.

• Almost as soon as Joe Biden was inaugurated, the Left knew that he was physically and mentally unable to serve as president.

Indeed, that was the point.Biden’s role was designed as a waxen figurine for hard-left agendas
that, without the “old Joe Biden from Scranton” pseudo-moderate veneer,
could never have been advanced.His handlers operated a nightmare administration: the destruction of deterrence abroad, two theater wars, 12 million illegal aliens, a weaponized justice system, hyperinflation, and $7 trillion more in debt.

• By 2017, the public knew three truths about the so-called Christopher Steele dossier.

One, it was completely fallacious—fabricated by a has-been,
ex-British spy Christopher Steele. He childishly had cobbled together
lurid sex stories, James Bond spy fictions, and Russian-fed
disinformation to destroy the Trump candidacy and later presidency.Two, it was paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign. She hid her
checks behind the Democratic National Committee, the Perkins Coie law
firm, and Fusion GPS paywalls.Three, the FBI under James Comey hired Steele as an informant. It
helped disseminate his concocted files and was also instrumental in
trying to subvert the Trump campaign and later administration.

• No sane person ever believed that Hunter Biden’s laptop
  was the work of “Russian disinformation.” Its contents a year before
  the 2020 election were verified by the FBI, but it kept mum about its
  confirmation.

The pornographic pictures, the evidence of prostitution and drug use,
the electronic communications implicating Joe Biden in his family’s
illicit shake-down operation of foreign governments—all were never
challenged by anyone who was associated with the laptop’s contents.Yet future Secretary of State Antony Blinken,
along with former interim CIA Director Mike Morell, sought to fabricate
a colossal lie to arm their candidate, Biden, with plausible denial in
the final presidential debate before the 2020 election.They rounded up a rogue’s gallery of 51 now utterly discredited
former intelligence authorities to lie to the nation that the laptop was
likely fake.All knew the FBI had verified the laptop. But they also knew that
their titles would empower their lies that the Russians likely invented
the laptop to aid the sinister Trump.And the ruse worked like a charm.In the debate, Biden cited their lies chapter and verse to claim the
incriminating laptop was fake. A lying media damned Trump as a puppet of
Russian President Vladimir Putin. Biden, little more than a week later,
won the 2020 election.

• The Biden administration deliberately destroyed the southern border
  and welcomed 12 million illegal aliens. And then it lied that Biden had
  no power to stop the influx.

The media fabricated the excuse that “comprehensive immigration
reform” was needed to enforce federal immigration laws already on the
books.Upon inauguration on Jan. 20, Trump, in a matter of days, stopped what Biden had deliberately engineered for years.Biden’s handlers wanted new millions of poor illegal aliens, dependent on social services, to swarm the borders.They saw them as future voters and constituents to fuel their victim/victimizer Marxist binaries.And they now quietly see their efforts as a huge success, knowing
that it will be nearly impossible to find the millions of illegal aliens
they welcomed in.All these lies have divided the country and permanently damaged the U.S.The perpetrators have neither apologized for their lies, nor tried to either deny or substantiate them.No one involved has ever been held legally accountable.The legacy media permanently ruined its reputation and will likely never be seen as credible again.The Biden administration, overseer of many of these lies, will be
regarded as the most duplicitous and dishonest presidency in modern
history.

What More Can Musk Do?

 

Elon Musk is in the news, again. It should be triumphant news accounts of what he’s done.

This huge Starship rocket, the largest and most powerful rocket in history, launched successfully with its Dragon capsule and it’s docked at the Space Station successfully to drop off an international crew of four and to bring back the stranded astronauts that were supposed to be only there days and for a variety of reasons we can’t get into—some of them political, perhaps—they didn’t get a chance to return for months.

In other words, Elon Musk has developed the most successful space program in the history of space travel. He’s superseded Boeing that couldn’t pull it off. He’s superseded NASA itself. So, this should be, again, a celebratory moment. Instead, he is at the height of his own popularity.

Recently, former Vice President candidate Tim Walz on the Democratic ticket has been touring the country. He’s called, associated Elon Musk with being a Nazi, fascist. He said the salute was a Nazi salute. I don’t think it was at all. But more importantly, he recently said that Elon Musk was a foreign-born, South African, nepo baby. Nepo baby, nepotism baby.

The vast treasure that Elon Musk has created did not come from his father. It came from his brilliance in SpaceX; taking over Twitter and reopening social media; Tesla, the first and most important and most successful of the electric vehicle industry; and of course, Starlink that gave internet, and I’m speaking on Starlink as right now, gave internet to people who live in rural areas such as my own.

He didn’t inherit anything. He inherited a slight fortune, perhaps, but he did it all on his own.

And Mr. Walz, are you comparing your behavior, your record in the late campaign with Elon Musk? Almost everything you said was contradicted, it was untrue. Your whole life story was fabricated. Your role in Minnesota was disastrous. And now you’re descending into xenophobia and suggesting that a U.S. citizen is South African with dual loyalties just because you disagree with what he’s doing.

So, what is causing this unpopularity? We know what it is. Elon Musk is applying his talents, he’s not being diplomatic about it, to reducing this vast federal spending that is threatening to bankrupt the country.

We’re $36 trillion in debt. We’re borrowing $1.7 trillion per year. The interest alone is costing us $3 billion a day. And no one is doing anything.

He is going through the entire federal budget in hopes that he can find a trillion dollars and with increased revenues, given an economic incentive, just maybe in a year or two for the first time since the millennium, we’ll be able to balance the budget.

At the same time Walz was sounding off about Musk, former astronaut and now U.S. Senator from Arizona, Sen. [Mark] Kelly was cutting a video in which he drives up in his Tesla, says he wants no more of it because Elon Musk is an a–hole. And more importantly, he says that Elon Musk is cutting Social Security and Medicare. He’s not. Health benefits and Medicare, Medi—he’s not. There’s no evidence he’s doing that unless somebody brings it to his attention that there is massive fraud. Even Barack Obama said there was fraud in Medicare and Social Security.

But then he made this performance art video and then he shows his new car, which is a Chevy Suburban—I think they get about 15 or 16 miles to the gallon. What did that Tesla that he is driving and he used to virtue signal was a car of the future given its small carbon footprint—what happened to it? Did it change? Did it all of a sudden not work? No. He’s blaming the car, but he’s already paid the money. The money is already in the coffers of Tesla. So, it’s an—and why use the profanity, which seems to be characteristic of the Democratic Party?

And finally, we’re getting very, it’s getting to a very dangerous crescendo of hate. Go on the internet. There is now an industry of people posting photos of their Cybertruck, their Y model, their X model being keyed and vandalized by young people in an organized fashion. There are chargers, Tesla chargers that are being destroyed. There’s Tesla dealers that are being attacked. All against Elon Musk.

Go back two or three years ago and he was an iconic Renaissance figure, we were told by the very people who are now calling him disloyal or not purely or not completely an American. This is one of the strangest phenomena of our time. And it should cease.

And the reason it should cease is if this rhetoric continues and this organized—it really is a—domestic terrorist campaign against Tesla increases, somebody’s going to do something stupid because they are lowering the bar of what’s permissible. We know what that stupid is. It’s a direct attack on Elon Musk himself.