Tuesday, January 14, 2025

Nintendo Switch 2 tech specs

 

Power Profiles

  • Handheld:
    • CPU @ 1100.8 MHz
    • GPU @ 561 MHz, 1.72 TFLOPs
    • RAM @ 2133 MHz, 68.26 GB/s
  • Docked:
    • CPU @ 998.4 MHz
    • GPU @ 1007.3 MHz, 3.09 TFLOPs
    • RAM @ 3200 MHz, 102.40 GB/s

And here’s a roundup of other unconfirmed tech specs:

Tech Specs

  • CPU: Arm Cortex-A78C
    • 8 cores
    • Unknown L1/L2/L3 cache sizes
  • GPU @ Nvidia T239 Ampere (RTX 20 series)
    • 1 Graphics Processing Cluster (GPC)
    • 12 Streaming Multiprocessors (SM)
    • 1534 CUDA cores
    • 6 Texture Processing Clusters (TPC)
    • 48 Gen 3 Tensor cores
    • 2 RTX ray-tracing cores
  • RAM: 12 GB LPDDR5, (some/all units will have LPDDR5X chips)
    • Two 6 GB chips

Over on Reddit, one comparison point for TFLOPS – which is one way of measuring power – has been the 2021-released GeForce RTX 3060 GPU. It had 12 TFLOPS, which would put Nintendo Switch 2 at a fourth of that. But looking purely at gaming consoles which probably makes more sense, the Xbox Series S comes in at 4 TFLOPS while the PS4 Pro is 4.2 TFLOPS. However, TFLOPS alone doesn’t fully tell us what Nintendo’s new device could be capable of, especially as DLSS will apparently be supported as a significant upscaling feature.

There have been so many rumors and leaks surrounding Nintendo Switch 2 over the past few months and weeks, so we may as well throw in TFLOPS to the mix. Things could finally come to a head this week though – at least partially. It’s rumored that the new system will be announced in some form on Thursday. Meanwhile, Nintendo previously confirmed an announcement for this fiscal year ending in March, so that deadline will be here sooner rather than later.

Slap In the Face: This Is How Much LA Residents Affected by Wildfires Will Receive from the Biden Admin

 

While the Biden administration announced a meager $770 one-time payout for each resident affected by the catastrophic wildfires ravaging Los Angeles, many are rightfully questioning the federal government's priorities. This pitiful sum starkly contrasts the billions in aid sent to Ukraine, raising concerns about the administration's commitment to addressing the needs of American citizens first. Critics argue that while the U.S. continues to funnel taxpayer dollars abroad, such as to Ukraine, struggling communities on American soil—especially in disaster-stricken areas like California—are left with temporary relief that will do so much as to cover just a few trips to the grocery store, address the long-term impact of these fires.

This week, the Biden administration announced it would send just over $700 to people affected by the Los Angeles wildfires. Mind you, California is one of the most expensive states in the country, with L.A. topping costs nationwide. The money is intended to cover immediate expenses such as food, gas, prescriptions, and other critical expenses. However, a few hundred dollars won’t get someone very far, especially if it’s supposed to cover an entire family. 

“We’re not waiting until those fires are over to start helping the victims. We’re getting them help right now, as you all know. People impacted by these fires are going to receive a one-time payment of $770, one-time payment, so they quickly purchase things like water, baby formula, and prescriptions,” outgoing President Joe Biden said in a wildfire briefing at the White House. 

Biden said nearly 6,000 people have already registered for the program, and $5.1 million has been distributed.

The California wildfire payout reflects the slap-in-the-face payment the Biden administration gave to Hawaii survivors who lost nearly everything during its wildfire catastrophe. Critics claim the government check was an insufficient sum given the scale of the disaster and argue that the amount is "paltry" and fails to reflect the actual cost of the devastation. In both situations, people have lost their lives, homes, and businesses. \

Additionally, critics contend that the payment is more symbolic than practical. Many survivors need far more financial support for long-term recovery and rebuilding efforts. The quick, initial disbursement of funds has also been criticized as a way to appease public outrage, as people blame the Democratic leadership. 

President-elect Donald Trump has called for Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) to resign over the devastating fires that many argue could have been avoided had the state’s leadership not focused on funding its progressive climate-driven policy.

People Sure Are Noticing How Terrible Tim Kaine's Line of Questioning for Pete Hegseth Was

 

Tuesday brought us the confirmation hearings for Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump's nominee for Secretary of Defense. There very many fiery and memorable moments between Hegseth and Democratic senators, including Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia, who was also Hillary Clinton's running mate in 2016. Kaine, and other Democrats, voiced concerns about Hegseth's private life, including his infidelity and his previous marriages. Kaine even began by saying he had been "looking forward" to such questioning. 

The senator sought to bring up that infidelity in the context of sexual allegations made against Hegseth, with the nominee stressing he had been "falsely charged, fully investigated, and completely cleared."

With a lecturing tone towards the nominee, Kaine wondered, "So you think you are completely cleared because you committed no crime? That's your definition of 'cleared?' You had just fathered a child two months before by a woman that was not your wife! I am shocked," Kaine continued, as he threw up his hands, "that you would say 'you are completely cleared,' can you so casually cheat on a second wife, and cheat on the mother of your child that had been born two months before, and you tell us 'you are completely cleared?' How is that 'a complete clear?'"

Beyond the gross and intimate line of questioning from the animated senator, the sexual assault allegations are also separate issues from the infidelity that occurred in Hegseth's previous marriages. 

Once the senator had taken a break from denigrating the nominee and his family, Hegseth spoke up for that child. "Senator, her child's name is Gwendolyn Hope Hegseth, and she's a child of God and she is seven-years-old." That didn't stop Kaine from attacking Hegseth further, though.

While Hegseth pointed out that "we're glad that she's here," Kaine still interrupted to emphasis his points further. "And you cheated on the mother of that child less than two months after that daughter was born, didn't you?"

"Those were false charges," Hegseth answered, keeping his cool, repeating that he was investigated and cleared, as Kaine again tried to speak over him. Even as Hegseth beckoned behind him to his wife, offering he was "so grateful for this amazing marriage that I have to this woman behind me," Kaine still wouldn't let it go.

"No, you've admitted," Kaine continued, wagging his finger, "you've admitted that you had sex at that hotel on [sic] October 2017. You said it was consensual," he insisted, demanding, "how do you explain your judgement?" Even as the nominee continued to remind Kaine, multiple times, that he had been cleared, Kaine didn't seem at all interested in actually hearing Hegseth's answers, and instead wanted to keep belaboring his points with uncomfortable questions. 

Kaine suddenly shifted to asking Hegseth how, "if it had been a sexual assault, that would be disqualifying to be Secretary of Defense, wouldn't it?" Hegseth continued to assert his innocence, insisting that the senator was bringing up "a hypothetical," as they were speaking about his own personal instance. 

"But you acknowledged that you cheated on your wife, you cheated on the woman who, by whom you had just fathered a child. You've admitted that?" Kaine continued, still evidently looking to embarrass Hegseth further. As Hegseth, in a humbled tone, offered, "I'll allow your words to speak for themselves," Kaine added, "you're not retracting that today, that's good," and went for an even more personal line of attack from there.

"I assume that at each of your weddings you've pledged to be faithful to your wife," Kaine continued. "You've taken an oath to do that, haven't you?" 

Hegseth, to his credit, gave the perfect response. "Senator, as I've acknowledged to everyone in this Committee, I'm not a perfect person, not claiming to be," he offered, though Kaine insisted he "just asked a simple question," one that was no doubt meant to embarrass and shame him further, and also applied his marriage "oath" to his oath to becoming Secretary of State.

"I have failed at things in my life. And thankfully I'm redeemed by my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ," Hegseth continued, repeating what he had powerfully communicated earlier, words which Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker (R-MS) pointed out would likely resonate with so many Americans. 

Kaine's line of questioning disgusted many, as evidenced in part by how such moments were a trending topic over X

While reacting to the confirmation hearing on CNN. Scott Jennings--who predicts that Hegseth will be confirmed, and that it's even more so likely due to that "embarrassing" display from Democrats --emphasized that he was "appalled" as one of his takeaways. 

Advertisement

"Well, in short, I think Pete Hegseth kicked their asses today," Jennings offered, speaking about how it went overall. "It wasn't even close. They didn't lay a glove on Hegseth, no mistakes, calm, cool, collected." Referencing the radical, left-wing protesters who attempted to disrupt the hearing just as it was kicking off, Jennings offered that such a "freak show" is "the Democratic base... which probably explains why the Democrats on the Committee acted in such a bizarre and unprofessional way!"

"I was appalled," Jennings continued, "at some of the ways these senators held themselves and some of the lines of questioning. I mean, Tim Kaine sounded like a sex pervert in his questioning of Pete Hegseth!" Jennings had plenty more Democrats to go after when it comes to these "unhinged rants."

"They made him look good today. It would be difficult for a Republican to vote against Hegseth after the Democrats' unseemly mudslinging today," Jennings further stressed. 

As if the line of questioning weren't bad enough all on its own, it also reeked of hypocrisy. The husband of Vice President Kamala Harris, Doug Emhoff, impregnated a woman when he was still married to his first wife and the mother of his children, with the marriage later dissolving. The woman did not have that child, and may have had an abortion or miscarriage. Harris and Emhoff are members of Kaine's own party, though, so that's likely different for reasons.

Amy Curtis at our sister site of Twitchy highlighted how users over X went after Kaine for campaigning with Emhoff. 

The hypocrisy goes even deeper from there, though, given Kaine's closeness with the Clintons. Former Bill Clinton had an affair with an intern in the Oval Office when he was president, and has been accused of sexual assault and even rape by other women. His wife, whom Kaine ran on the same ticket as, not only defended her husband, took part in smearing those women making the allegations, as even Vox went after her for

Sunday, January 12, 2025

L.A. Water Chief Knew Fire Hydrants Were Broken, Yet Earns Nearly $800K Annually

 

In yet another example of mismanagement and government waste, the head of Los Angeles' water department, who was reportedly aware that crucial fire hydrants were out of service, is pulling in a staggering nearly $800,000 annually. While L.A. residents face increasing dangers from the wildfires ravaging the city— with many who have already lost their homes and 12 dead— the city’s water chief appears more focused on lining his pockets than ensuring the safety of the public. Critics argue that this glaring oversight is emblematic of local government's broader incompetence. Top officials continue to earn hefty salaries while failing to address basic public safety issues.


According to a new report, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) CEO Janisse Quiñone was fully aware that the Santa Ynez Reservoir was offline and fire hydrants were not operating. However, despite the city stretching its budget to "attract private-sector talent," it appointed Janisse Quiñones as CEO of the Department of Water and Power (LADWP) in May, offering her a $750,000 salary—nearly double what her predecessor earned.

The Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) blames Quiñones for leaving fire hydrants empty and disconnecting the Santa Ynez Reservoir in the Pacific Palisades for several months. 

According to the Daily Mail, this is not the first time Quiñones has been involved in a scandal. 

Quiñones past employer is also linked to fire scandals. She was previously a top executive at electricity company PG&E, which went bankrupt over liability for several massive wildfires in California. She served as senior vice president at Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) from 2021 to 2023. The utility company's power lines sparked the second-largest wildfire in California history, Dixie, in 2021. Its involvement in the 2018 Camp Fire cost PG&E a $13.5 billion legal settlement.

The firm's liability for allegedly causing fires was estimated at $30 billion when it filed for bankruptcy in 2018. It exited bankruptcy in 2020.

Sources told DailyMail.com that since her hiring at LADWP, Quiñones oversaw the shutdown and emptying of a reservoir in the Pacific Palisades during brushfire season. The shutdown meant firefighters battling the current Palisades Fire ran out of water faster, experts say.

The Bible and the Schools

 

Irony of ironies. There was an attempt to ban the Bible from school libraries in a conservative state because of a law against risqué content in school books. 

The Mirror out of the UK reports: “A Texas school district has reportedly been forced to remove copies of the Bible after a new state law banned books that were ‘sexually explicit.’ It was revealed in an email from Canyon Independent School District Superintendent Darryl Flusche, that the holy book had been deemed unsuitable due to ‘sexually explicit material.’"

It clearly appears that school officials are trying to play “gotcha” with opponents of sexually explicit schoolbooks. The Mirror added, “Several parents were reportedly furious with the news. During a school board meeting earlier [in December 2024], Canyon ISD parent Regina Kiehne told school officials it ‘seems absurd to me that the Good Book was thrown out with the bad books.’"

The blowback was so strong, school officials retreated from their guileful position in the face of widespread opposition. 

I’m glad to hear that some of the school districts in Texas allow the Bible on school property at all. But it’s a shame that ever since the Supreme Court ruled in the Abington v. Schempp case of 1963, many school districts have banned the Good Book altogether from the schools (while at the same time often allowing all manner of LGBTQ pornography).

In Schempp, the court declared as unconstitutional use of the Bible for devotional purposes in the classroom. But they added that the Bible has its place in a well-rounded education.

Said the majority of the justices: “It certainly may be said that the Bible is worthy of study for its literary and historic qualities. Nothing we have said here indicates that such study of the Bible or of religion, when presented objectively as part of a secular program of education, may not be effected consistently with the First Amendment.”

For decades, many public school systems have systematically gone way beyond what the Supreme Court decided. Personally I think many of those Supreme Court decisions, such as Schempp, were wrongly decided. They grew out of a bias in favor of secularism and opposed to religion. Frankly, this country was founded by Christians for religious freedom, which they generously offered to other groups. 

The irony of the Bible being controversial in the schools is that this is the book that helped create the educational system in America.

When you trace back education in our country, you see the Bible was the chief motivating factor. It was so that people could read the Bible for themselves that schools were started in the first place. 

The first law regarding education in America is nicknamed “the Old Deluder Satan Act.” The Puritans, the founders of Boston, wanted their children to learn how to read so they could read the Scriptures for themselves.

The act explicitly states that this was a counter-measure against the devil, who wants people to remain ignorant of the Word of God.

This 1647 Act states: “It being one chief project of that old deluder, Satan, to keep men from the knowledge of the Scriptures…and that Learning may not be buried in the graves of our fore-fathers in Church and Commonwealth, the Lord assisting our endeavors: it is therefore ordered… [that every township] shall then forthwith appoint one within their town to teach all such children as shall resort to him to write and read.”

The children even learned their ABCs with Bible lessons. The widely used New England Primer taught: “A-In Adam’s fall, we sinned all. B-thy life to mend, the Bible tend. C-Christ crucified, for sinners died.” 

The original colleges and universities were started to train ministers of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Harvard’s original motto (in Latin) was “Truth for Christ and the Church.” The first president of Princeton, Rev, Jonathan Dickinson, said, “Cursed be all learning contrary to the cross of Christ.” Except for Cornell (founded 200 years after Harvard), all of the Ivy League schools were explicitly Christian.

And on it goes.  

Founding father and Declaration of Independence signer Dr. Benjamin Rush declared, “The only foundation for a useful education in a republic is to be laid in RELIGION….Without this, there can be no virtue, and without virtue there can be no liberty, and liberty is the object and life of all republican governments. . .. the religion I mean to recommend in this place is the religion of JESUS CHRIST.” [emphasis his]

Dr. Rush also warned of the consequences when schools ignore teaching the Bible: “I lament that we waste so much time and money in punishing crimes and take so little pains to prevent them.”

We need more Bible in the schools, including the public schools, not less.